J Travel Med. 2022 Jan 17;29(1). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taab042.
Antibiotics are no longer the primary approach for treating all travellers' diarrhoea (TD): most cases resolve without antibiotics and using them predisposes to colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Data are accumulating on increasing resistance among TD pathogens, yet research into the most common agents, diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli (DEC), remains limited.
A total of 413 travellers to the (sub)tropics were analyzed for travel-acquired diarrhoeal pathogens and ESBL-PE. To identify ESBL-producing DEC, ESBL-producing E. coli (ESBL-EC) isolates were subjected to multiplex qPCR for various DEC pathotypes: enteroaggregative (EAEC), enteropathogenic (EPEC), enterotoxigenic (ETEC), enteroinvasive (EIEC) and enterohaemorrhagic (EHEC) E. coli.For a literature review, we screened studies among travellers and locals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) on the frequency of ESBL-producing DEC, and among travellers, also DEC with resistance to ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, and rifamycin derivatives.
Our rate of ESBL-EC among all DEC findings was 2.7% (13/475); among EAEC 5.7% (10/175), EPEC 1.1% (2/180), ETEC 1.3% (1/80) and EHEC (0/35) or EIEC 0% (0/5). The literature search yielded three studies reporting ESBL-EC frequency and thirteen exploring resistance to TD antibiotics among travel-acquired DEC. For EAEC and ETEC, the ESBL-EC rates were 10-13% and 14-15%, resistance to fluoroquinolones 0-42% and 0-40%, azithromycin 0-29% and 0-61%, and rifaximin 0% and 0-20%. The highest rates were from the most recent collections. Proportions of ESBL-producing DEC also appear to be increasing among locals in LMICs and even carbapenemase-producing DEC were reported.
ESBL producers are no longer rare among DEC, and the overall resistance to various antibiotics is increasing. The data predict decreasing efficacy of antibiotic treatment, threatening its benefits, for disadvantages still prevail when efficacy is lost.
抗生素不再是治疗所有旅行者腹泻(TD)的主要方法:大多数病例无需抗生素即可治愈,而使用抗生素则会导致多药耐药菌定植。关于 TD 病原体的耐药性不断增加的数据正在积累,但对最常见病原体——产肠毒素性大肠埃希菌(DEC)的研究仍然有限。
对 413 名前往(亚)热带地区的旅行者进行了旅行相关腹泻病原体和 ESBL-PE 的分析。为了鉴定产 ESBL 的 DEC,对产 ESBL 的大肠埃希菌(ESBL-EC)分离株进行了各种 DEC 血清型的多重 qPCR 检测:肠聚集性(EAEC)、肠致病性(EPEC)、肠毒性(ETEC)、肠侵袭性(EIEC)和肠出血性(EHEC)大肠埃希菌。为了进行文献综述,我们筛选了来自低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)旅行者和当地人的关于产 ESBL 的 DEC 频率的研究,以及旅行者中对环丙沙星、阿奇霉素和利福霉素衍生物耐药的 DEC 研究。
我们在所有 DEC 检测结果中发现 ESBL-EC 的比例为 2.7%(13/475);在 EAEC 中为 5.7%(10/175),在 EPEC 中为 1.1%(2/180),在 ETEC 中为 1.3%(1/80),在 EHEC 中为 0%(0/35)或在 EIEC 中为 0%(0/5)。文献检索共获得三项研究报告了 ESBL-EC 的频率,以及十三项关于旅行者获得的 DEC 对 TD 抗生素耐药性的研究。对于 EAEC 和 ETEC,ESBL-EC 的比例为 10-13%和 14-15%,对氟喹诺酮类药物的耐药率为 0-42%和 0-40%,对阿奇霉素的耐药率为 0-29%和 0-61%,对利福昔明的耐药率为 0%和 0-20%。最高的耐药率来自最近的采集样本。LMICs 中当地人群中也出现了产 ESBL 的 DEC 的比例增加的情况,甚至报告了产碳青霉烯酶的 DEC。
产 ESBL 的 DEC 已不再罕见,对各种抗生素的整体耐药性正在增加。数据预测抗生素治疗的疗效正在下降,这威胁到其益处,因为当疗效丧失时,劣势仍然存在。