1Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
2Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
J Pers Assess. 2022 Jan-Feb;104(1):98-109. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1905651. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
One of the most used instruments to assess perfectionism is Hewitt and Flett's Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (HFMPS). This article reports result of two studies aimed at evaluating and comparing two short HFMPS versions provided by literature in Italian samples. In Study 1, two previously proposed short forms-Cox and colleagues' and Hewitt and colleagues'-were compared in terms of factor structure and concurrent validity in a community sample of 324 participants. In Study 2, validity and reliability of the two short scales in 102 university students and 58 patients with a primary diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder were examined. Results revealed mixed findings concerning which of the two short form should be preferred.
评估完美主义最常用的工具之一是 Hewitt 和 Flett 的多维完美主义量表（HFMPS）。本文报告了两项研究的结果，旨在评估和比较文献中提供的两种意大利语样本的 HFMPS 短版本。在研究 1 中，在一个由 324 名参与者组成的社区样本中，比较了 Cox 及其同事和 Hewitt 及其同事提出的两种短版本，从因子结构和同时效度方面进行了比较。在研究 2 中，在 102 名大学生和 58 名强迫症患者的样本中，对两种短量表的有效性和可靠性进行了检验。结果显示，对于两种短版本中哪种更应优先，发现的结果喜忧参半。
