• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“向医生咨询新冠病毒相关问题”:社交媒体上的医生如何在疫情期间提供有效的健康信息。

"Ask a Doctor About Coronavirus": How Physicians on Social Media Can Provide Valid Health Information During a Pandemic.

作者信息

Furstrand Dorthe, Pihl Andreas, Orbe Elif Bayram, Kingod Natasja, Søndergaard Jens

机构信息

Section for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Roche Diagnostics, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 20;23(4):e24586. doi: 10.2196/24586.

DOI:10.2196/24586
PMID:33835935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8059786/
Abstract

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the information stream has overflowed with accurate information, misinformation, and constantly changing guidelines. There is a great need for guidance on the identification of trustworthy health information, and official channels are struggling to keep pace with this infodemic. Consequently, a Facebook group was created where volunteer medical physicians would answer laypeople's questions about the 2019 novel coronavirus. There is not much precedence in health care professional-driven Facebook groups, and the framework was thus developed continuously. We ended up with an approach without room for debate, which fostered a sense of calmness, trust, and safety among the questioners. Substantial moderator effort was needed to ensure high quality and consistency through collaboration among the presently >200 physicians participating in this group. At the time of writing, the group provides a much-needed service to >58,000 people in Denmark during this crisis.

摘要

在新冠疫情之后,信息流中充斥着准确信息、错误信息以及不断变化的指导方针。对于如何识别可靠的健康信息,人们非常需要指导,而官方渠道正努力跟上这一信息疫情的步伐。因此,创建了一个脸书群组,志愿医生会在其中回答外行人关于2019新型冠状病毒的问题。由医疗保健专业人员推动的脸书群组先例不多,因此该框架是不断发展形成的。我们最终采用了一种不容置疑的方法,这在提问者中营造了一种平静、信任和安全的感觉。需要大量版主的努力,通过目前参与该群组的200多名医生之间的合作来确保高质量和一致性。在撰写本文时,在这场危机期间,该群组为丹麦的58000多人提供了一项急需的服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/410d/8059786/7ecd9adb8ea6/jmir_v23i4e24586_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/410d/8059786/7ecd9adb8ea6/jmir_v23i4e24586_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/410d/8059786/7ecd9adb8ea6/jmir_v23i4e24586_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
"Ask a Doctor About Coronavirus": How Physicians on Social Media Can Provide Valid Health Information During a Pandemic.“向医生咨询新冠病毒相关问题”:社交媒体上的医生如何在疫情期间提供有效的健康信息。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 20;23(4):e24586. doi: 10.2196/24586.
2
Demographic Factors Influencing the Impact of Coronavirus-Related Misinformation on WhatsApp: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.影响 WhatsApp 上与冠状病毒相关错误信息影响的人口统计学因素:横断面问卷调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 30;7(1):e19858. doi: 10.2196/19858.
3
Framework for Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Methods and Results of an Online, Crowdsourced WHO Technical Consultation.管理新冠疫情信息疫情的框架:世卫组织在线众包技术磋商会的方法与结果
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 26;22(6):e19659. doi: 10.2196/19659.
4
Infodemic, Misinformation and Disinformation in Pandemics: Scientific Landscape and the Road Ahead for Public Health Informatics Research.大流行中的信息疫情、错误信息和虚假信息:公共卫生信息学研究的科学格局和未来道路。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:764-768. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210278.
5
Medical Misinformation in Polish on the World Wide Web During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: Infodemiology Study.COVID-19 大流行期间波兰万维网上的医学错误信息:信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 29;26:e48130. doi: 10.2196/48130.
6
Digital Health Literacy and Web-Based Information-Seeking Behaviors of University Students in Germany During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study.新冠疫情期间德国大学生的数字健康素养和基于网络的信息搜索行为:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 15;23(1):e24097. doi: 10.2196/24097.
7
Empowering Health Care Workers on Social Media to Bolster Trust in Science and Vaccination During the Pandemic: Making IMPACT Using a Place-Based Approach.在大流行期间,通过社交媒体赋予医疗保健工作者权力,以增强对科学和疫苗接种的信任:使用基于地点的方法实现 IMPACT。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 17;24(10):e38949. doi: 10.2196/38949.
8
A Framework of AI-Based Approaches to Improving eHealth Literacy and Combating Infodemic.基于人工智能的方法框架,用于提高电子健康素养和应对信息疫情。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;9:755808. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.755808. eCollection 2021.
9
US Physicians' and Nurses' Motivations, Barriers, and Recommendations for Correcting Health Misinformation on Social Media: Qualitative Interview Study.美国医生和护士纠正社交媒体上健康错误信息的动机、障碍和建议:定性访谈研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Sep 1;7(9):e27715. doi: 10.2196/27715.
10
Using Narrative Evidence to Convey Health Information on Social Media: The Case of COVID-19.利用叙事证据在社交媒体上传播健康信息:以新冠疫情为例
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 15;23(3):e24948. doi: 10.2196/24948.

引用本文的文献

1
Opportunities and challenges of social media for oral health literacy improvement: a qualitative investigation based on Iranian dentists' perspectives.社交媒体在提高口腔健康素养方面的机遇与挑战:基于伊朗牙医视角的质性调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 10;25(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12845-z.
2
A study on the practical logic and promotion path of agile governance of distorted health information on the internet: A review.互联网失真健康信息敏捷治理的实践逻辑与推进路径研究:综述
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 28;104(13):e41897. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041897.
3
Global Health Informatics: the state of research and lessons learned.

本文引用的文献

1
Building trust while influencing online COVID-19 content in the social media world.在社交媒体领域影响在线新冠疫情相关内容的同时建立信任。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jun;2(6):e277-e278. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30084-4. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
2
The tinkering m-patient: Co-constructing knowledge on how to live with type 1 diabetes through Facebook searching and sharing and offline tinkering with self-care.不断摸索的m患者:通过在脸书上搜索和分享以及线下自行摸索自我护理方法,共同构建如何与1型糖尿病共处的知识。
Health (London). 2020 Mar;24(2):152-168. doi: 10.1177/1363459318800140. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
Online Peer-to-Peer Communities in the Daily Lives of People With Chronic Illness: A Qualitative Systematic Review.
全球卫生信息学:研究现状与经验教训
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Mar 16;30(4):627-633. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad027.
4
Insights Into the Relationships Between Health Communication and Doctor-patient Relationship: A Scientometric Analysis Based on CiteSpace and Validation of Questionnaires.健康传播与医患关系的关系洞察:基于 CiteSpace 的科学计量分析与问卷验证。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231152071. doi: 10.1177/00469580231152071.
5
A scoping review of digital health interventions for combating COVID-19 misinformation and disinformation.针对 COVID-19 错误信息和虚假信息的数字健康干预措施的范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Mar 16;30(4):752-760. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad005.
6
A Comprehensive Analysis of E-Health Literacy Research Focuses and Trends.电子健康素养研究重点与趋势的综合分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 30;10(1):66. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010066.
7
Knowledge, Anxiety, Depression, and Sleep Quality Among Medical Staff in Central South Areas of China During the Break of COVID-19: Does the Level of Hospitals Make a Difference?中国中部地区新冠疫情缓解期医务人员的知识、焦虑、抑郁及睡眠质量:医院级别有影响吗?
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 20;12:714870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.714870. eCollection 2021.
慢性病患者日常生活中的在线对等社区:一项定性系统综述
Qual Health Res. 2017 Jan;27(1):89-99. doi: 10.1177/1049732316680203.
4
Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals.社交媒体在医疗保健中的应用:对患者及其与医疗保健专业人员关系影响的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 26;16(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1691-0.
5
Social networking and understanding alcohol-associated risk for people with type 1 diabetes: friend or foe?社交网络和理解 1 型糖尿病患者的酒精相关风险:是敌是友?
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Apr;15(4):308-14. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0327. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
6
Health behavior interventions in the age of facebook.脸书时代的健康行为干预措施。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5):571-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.001.
7
Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia.增强乳腺癌、关节炎或纤维肌痛患者参与在线支持小组的过程和效果。
Qual Health Res. 2008 Mar;18(3):405-17. doi: 10.1177/1049732307313429.