• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胎儿运动减少感知后行剖宫产的脑胎盘比值预测指标:一项国际多中心随机临床试验方案;CEPRA 研究。

The CErebro Placental RAtio as indicator for delivery following perception of reduced fetal movements, protocol for an international cluster randomised clinical trial; the CEPRA study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03760-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-021-03760-2
PMID:33836690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8034072/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Routine assessment in (near) term pregnancy is often inaccurate for the identification of fetuses who are mild to moderately compromised due to placental insufficiency and are at risk of adverse outcomes, especially when fetal size is seemingly within normal range for gestational age. Although biometric measurements and cardiotocography are frequently used, it is known that these techniques have low sensitivity and specificity. In clinical practice this diagnostic uncertainty results in considerable 'over treatment' of women with healthy fetuses whilst truly compromised fetuses remain unidentified. The CPR is the ratio of the umbilical artery pulsatility index over the middle cerebral artery pulsatility index. A low CPR reflects fetal redistribution and is thought to be indicative of placental insufficiency independent of actual fetal size, and a marker of adverse outcomes. Its utility as an indicator for delivery in women with reduced fetal movements (RFM) is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess whether expedited delivery of women with RFM identified as high risk on the basis of a low CPR improves neonatal outcomes. Secondary aims include childhood outcomes, maternal obstetric outcomes, and the predictive value of biomarkers for adverse outcomes.

METHODS

International multicentre cluster randomised trial of women with singleton pregnancies with RFM at term, randomised to either an open or concealed arm. Only women with an estimated fetal weight ≥ 10th centile, a fetus in cephalic presentation and normal cardiotocograph are eligible and after informed consent the CPR will be measured. Expedited delivery is recommended in women with a low CPR in the open arm. Women in the concealed arm will not have their CPR results revealed and will receive routine clinical care. The intended sample size based on the primary outcome is 2160 patients. The primary outcome is a composite of: stillbirth, neonatal mortality, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, cord pH < 7.10, emergency delivery for fetal distress, and severe neonatal morbidity.

DISCUSSION

The CEPRA trial will identify whether the CPR is a good indicator for delivery in women with perceived reduced fetal movements.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch trial registry (NTR), trial NL7557 . Registered 25 February 2019.

摘要

背景

常规评估(临近)妊娠通常无法准确识别因胎盘功能不全而轻度至中度受损且存在不良结局风险的胎儿,尤其是当胎儿大小看似在孕龄正常范围内时。尽管生物测量和胎心监护图经常被使用,但已知这些技术的敏感性和特异性较低。在临床实践中,这种诊断不确定性导致对健康胎儿的过度治疗相当多,而真正受损的胎儿仍然未被识别。CPR 是脐动脉搏动指数与大脑中动脉搏动指数的比值。低 CPR 反映胎儿重新分布,被认为是胎盘功能不全的独立指标,与实际胎儿大小无关,也是不良结局的标志物。其作为减少胎儿运动(RFM)妇女分娩的指标的效用尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估基于低 CPR 识别为高危的 RFM 妇女的加速分娩是否改善新生儿结局。次要目标包括儿童结局、产妇产科结局以及生物标志物对不良结局的预测价值。

方法

在足月时患有 RFM 的单胎妊娠妇女中进行国际多中心集群随机试验,随机分为开放或隐蔽臂。只有估计胎儿体重≥第 10 百分位数、胎儿头位且正常胎心监护图的妇女有资格参加,在知情同意后将测量 CPR。在开放臂中,CPR 低值的妇女建议加速分娩。隐蔽臂中的妇女不会透露她们的 CPR 结果,将接受常规临床护理。基于主要结局的预期样本量为 2160 例患者。主要结局是:死产、新生儿死亡率、5 分钟时 Apgar 评分<7、脐动脉 pH<7.10、因胎儿窘迫紧急分娩和严重新生儿发病率。

讨论

CEPRA 试验将确定 CPR 是否是感知到的减少胎儿运动的妇女分娩的良好指标。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册处(NTR),试验 NL7557。于 2019 年 2 月 25 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/8034072/209abc06b14d/12884_2021_3760_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/8034072/209abc06b14d/12884_2021_3760_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4961/8034072/209abc06b14d/12884_2021_3760_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The CErebro Placental RAtio as indicator for delivery following perception of reduced fetal movements, protocol for an international cluster randomised clinical trial; the CEPRA study.胎儿运动减少感知后行剖宫产的脑胎盘比值预测指标:一项国际多中心随机临床试验方案;CEPRA 研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03760-2.
2
Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.在预测不良围生期结局时,于 35-37 孕周常规评估脑-胎盘比值。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1):65.e1-65.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
3
Is the fetal cerebroplacental ratio better that the estimated fetal weight in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in a low risk cohort?在低风险队列中,胎儿脑胎盘比值在预测围产期不良结局方面是否比估计胎儿体重更好?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Jul;32(14):2380-2386. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1438394. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
4
Cerebroplacental ratio assessment in early labor in uncomplicated term pregnancy and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: prospective multicenter study.在无并发症足月妊娠的早期分娩中评估脑胎盘比值及其对不良围产结局的预测:前瞻性多中心研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):481-487. doi: 10.1002/uog.19113. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
5
A low fetal cerebroplacental ratio confers a greater risk of intrapartum fetal compromise and adverse neonatal outcomes in low risk multiparous women at term.在足月低风险经产妇中,胎儿脑胎盘比值低会增加产时胎儿窘迫和不良新生儿结局的风险。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Nov;230:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
Reduced fetal movement intervention Trial-2 (ReMIT-2): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of standard care informed by the result of a placental growth factor (PlGF) blood test versus standard care alone in women presenting with reduced fetal movement at or after 36 weeks gestation.减少胎儿活动干预试验-2(ReMIT-2):一项在 36 周或以上出现胎动减少的孕妇中,根据胎盘生长因子(PlGF)血液检测结果提供标准护理的信息,与单独接受标准护理相比的试点随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2018 Oct 1;19(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2859-1.
7
Value of third-trimester cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler indices as predictors of stillbirth and perinatal loss.孕晚期脑胎盘比率和子宫动脉多普勒指数作为死产和围产期损失预测指标的价值。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;47(1):74-80. doi: 10.1002/uog.15729.
8
Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio adjusted for estimated fetal weight.通过校正估计胎儿体重的脑胎盘比值预测不良围产结局。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;51(3):381-386. doi: 10.1002/uog.17458. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
9
Magnitude of change in fetal cerebroplacental ratio in third trimester and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.胎儿脑-胎盘比值在孕晚期的变化幅度与不良妊娠结局的风险。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;50(4):514-519. doi: 10.1002/uog.17371. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
10
Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio in women undergoing induction of labor.脑胎盘比值预测行引产术孕妇的不良围产结局。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):473-480. doi: 10.1002/uog.20173. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Amsterdam Criteria and beyond: development of a Standardized Structured Reporting (SSR) tool for diagnosis of placental pathology.阿姆斯特丹标准及其他:用于胎盘病理学诊断的标准化结构化报告(SSR)工具的开发。
Virchows Arch. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s00428-025-04143-0.
2
Fetal Growth Restriction: Mechanisms, Epidemiology, and Management.胎儿生长受限:机制、流行病学及管理
Matern Fetal Med. 2022 Jul 22;4(3):186-196. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000161. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Risk Factors for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Reduced Fetal Movement: An IPD Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.脑胎盘比预测不良围产结局:一项个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(2):226-235. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16287. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
2
Is it possible to predict late antepartum stillbirth by means of cerebroplacental ratio and maternal characteristics?通过脑胎盘比值和产妇特征预测晚期产前胎儿死亡是否可能?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Sep;33(17):2996-3002. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1566900. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
3
Awareness of fetal movements and care package to reduce fetal mortality (AFFIRM): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial.
胎动减少时不良妊娠结局的危险因素:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析
BJOG. 2025 Jun;132(7):1000-1009. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18132. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
Fetal movement trials: Where is the evidence in settings with a high burden of stillbirths?胎动试验:在死产负担高的环境中证据何在?
BJOG. 2023 Feb;130(3):241-243. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17249. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
5
Cerebral Blood Flow Monitoring in High-Risk Fetal and Neonatal Populations.高危胎儿和新生儿群体的脑血流监测
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jan 11;9:748345. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.748345. eCollection 2021.
胎儿运动感知和护理包以降低胎儿死亡率(AFFIRM):一项阶梯式楔形、整群随机试验。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 3;392(10158):1629-1638. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31543-5. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
Reduced fetal movements and cerebroplacental ratio: evidence for worsening fetal hypoxemia.胎儿运动减少和脑胎盘比值降低:胎儿缺氧恶化的证据。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;51(3):375-380. doi: 10.1002/uog.18830.
5
Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis.脑胎盘比和大脑中动脉多普勒对不良围产结局的预测准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;51(3):313-322. doi: 10.1002/uog.18809. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
6
The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio as a predictor for poor pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.可溶性血管内皮生长因子受体-1/胎盘生长因子比值作为不良妊娠和新生儿结局的预测指标。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2017 Dec;58(6):529-533. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2016.10.005. Epub 2017 May 10.
7
Perinatal loss at term: role of uteroplacental and fetal Doppler assessment.足月围产儿丢失:子宫胎盘和胎儿多普勒评估的作用。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):72-77. doi: 10.1002/uog.17500.
8
Perinatal outcomes of reduced fetal movements: a cohort study.胎动减少的围产期结局:一项队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 19;16(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0964-2.
9
Sampling and Definitions of Placental Lesions: Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement.胎盘病变的采样与定义:阿姆斯特丹胎盘研讨会小组共识声明
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Jul;140(7):698-713. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0225-CC. Epub 2016 May 25.
10
Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure.胎儿生长受限的共识定义:德尔菲法
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;48(3):333-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.15884.