Suppr超能文献

“脑力工作干预”对减少有心理问题的非永久性工人的病假是否有效?一项对照临床试验的结果。

Is the "Brainwork Intervention" effective in reducing sick leave for non-permanent workers with psychological problems? Results of a controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health/Research Center for Insurance Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Research Institute of Child Development and Education, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10704-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both the presence of psychological problems and the absence of an employment contract are related to long-term sickness absence, prolonged work disability and unemployment. Studies researching the effectiveness of return-to-work interventions on these non-permanent workers, including unemployed and temporary agency workers and workers with an expired fixed-term contract, are lagging behind. Therefore, a return-to-work intervention called "Brainwork" was developed. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the 'Brainwork Intervention' in reducing the duration of sick leave compared to usual care over a 12-month follow-up.

METHODS

In a multicenter controlled clinical trial, using a quasi-randomization procedure, we compared the Brainwork Intervention (n = 164) to usual care (n = 156). The primary outcome was the duration of sick leave. Secondary outcomes were the duration of sick leave starting from Social Security Agency transfer; the proportion of workers returned to work; the number of hours of paid employment during the follow-up period; the degree of worker participation; the level of psychological complaints; and the self-efficacy for return to work. Protocol adherence (Brainwork Intervention) was considered sufficient when at least three of the five protocol steps were followed. Cox regressions, linear and ordinal regression, and Mixed Model analyses were performed.

RESULTS

All 320 participants were analyzed. The Brainwork Intervention resulted in a non-significant reduction of the duration of sick leave compared to usual care (269 days versus 296 days; HR = 1.29; 95% CI 0.94-1.76; p = 0.11). For those working (46%) during the 12-month follow-up, the mean number of hours of paid employment was non-significantly higher in the usual care group (682 h versus 493 h; p = 0.053). No significant differences were found for other secondary outcomes. Protocol adherence was 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Brainwork Intervention as performed with a low protocol adherence did not result in a significant reduction of the duration of sick leave compared to usual care. It remains unclear what the results would have been if the Brainwork Intervention had been executed according to protocol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Netherlands Trial Register (NTR); NTR3976 (old registration number NTR4190). Registered September 27th 2013.

摘要

背景

心理问题的存在和就业合同的缺失都与长期病假、工作残疾时间延长和失业有关。研究非永久性工人(包括失业者、临时工和固定期限合同到期的工人)重返工作岗位的干预措施的效果的研究相对滞后。因此,开发了一种名为“脑力工作”的重返工作岗位干预措施。本研究旨在评估“脑力工作干预”与常规护理相比,在 12 个月的随访中减少病假时间的效果。

方法

采用多中心对照临床试验,采用准随机分组程序,比较脑力工作干预(n=164)与常规护理(n=156)。主要结局是病假时间。次要结局是从社会保障机构转移开始的病假时间;重返工作的工人比例;随访期间的带薪工作小时数;工人参与度;心理投诉程度;以及重返工作的自我效能感。当至少遵循五个方案步骤中的三个步骤时,认为方案遵守(脑力工作干预)是充分的。进行 Cox 回归、线性和有序回归以及混合模型分析。

结果

所有 320 名参与者均进行了分析。与常规护理相比,脑力工作干预并未显著减少病假时间(269 天与 296 天;HR=1.29;95%CI0.94-1.76;p=0.11)。在 12 个月随访期间工作(46%)的人,常规护理组的带薪工作小时数平均明显更高(682 小时与 493 小时;p=0.053)。其他次要结局无显著差异。方案遵守率为 10%。

结论

与常规护理相比,执行低方案遵守率的脑力工作干预并未显著减少病假时间。如果按照方案执行脑力工作干预,结果会如何尚不清楚。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册(NTR);NTR3976(旧注册号 NTR4190)。于 2013 年 9 月 27 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef6c/8034165/b23e06d67b6f/12889_2021_10704_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验