Greenlee School of Journalism and Communication, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914085117.
Science and storytelling mean different things when they speak of truth. This difference leads some to blame storytelling for presenting a distorted view of science and contributing to misinformation. Yet others celebrate storytelling as a way to engage audiences and share accurate scientific information. This review disentangles the complexities of how storytelling intersects with scientific misinformation. Storytelling is the act of sharing a narrative, and science and narrative represent two distinct ways of constructing reality. Where science searches for broad patterns that capture general truths about the world, narratives search for connections through human experience that assign meaning and value to reality. I explore how these contrasting conceptions of truth manifest across different contexts to either promote or counter scientific misinformation. I also identify gaps in the literature and identify promising future areas of research. Even with their differences, the underlying purpose of both science and narrative seeks to make sense of the world and find our place within it. While narrative can indeed lead to scientific misinformation, narrative can also help science counter misinformation by providing meaning to reality that incorporates accurate science knowledge into human experience.
当科学和故事讲述谈论真理时,它们意味着不同的东西。这种差异导致一些人将故事讲述归咎于呈现扭曲的科学观点,并导致错误信息。然而,另一些人则称赞故事讲述是一种吸引观众和分享准确科学信息的方式。这篇综述厘清了故事讲述如何与科学错误信息交织在一起的复杂性。故事讲述是分享叙述的行为,而科学和叙述则代表了构建现实的两种截然不同的方式。科学寻找捕捉世界普遍真理的广泛模式,而叙述则通过人类经验寻找联系,为现实赋予意义和价值。我探讨了这些截然不同的真理观念如何在不同的背景下表现出来,以促进或抵制科学错误信息。我还确定了文献中的差距,并确定了有前途的未来研究领域。尽管存在差异,但科学和叙述的基本目的都是为了理解世界,并在其中找到自己的位置。虽然叙事确实会导致科学错误信息,但叙事也可以通过为现实提供意义来帮助科学对抗错误信息,将准确的科学知识纳入人类经验。