Suppr超能文献

关于科学错误信息的叙述性真相。

The narrative truth about scientific misinformation.

机构信息

Greenlee School of Journalism and Communication, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914085117.

Abstract

Science and storytelling mean different things when they speak of truth. This difference leads some to blame storytelling for presenting a distorted view of science and contributing to misinformation. Yet others celebrate storytelling as a way to engage audiences and share accurate scientific information. This review disentangles the complexities of how storytelling intersects with scientific misinformation. Storytelling is the act of sharing a narrative, and science and narrative represent two distinct ways of constructing reality. Where science searches for broad patterns that capture general truths about the world, narratives search for connections through human experience that assign meaning and value to reality. I explore how these contrasting conceptions of truth manifest across different contexts to either promote or counter scientific misinformation. I also identify gaps in the literature and identify promising future areas of research. Even with their differences, the underlying purpose of both science and narrative seeks to make sense of the world and find our place within it. While narrative can indeed lead to scientific misinformation, narrative can also help science counter misinformation by providing meaning to reality that incorporates accurate science knowledge into human experience.

摘要

当科学和故事讲述谈论真理时,它们意味着不同的东西。这种差异导致一些人将故事讲述归咎于呈现扭曲的科学观点,并导致错误信息。然而,另一些人则称赞故事讲述是一种吸引观众和分享准确科学信息的方式。这篇综述厘清了故事讲述如何与科学错误信息交织在一起的复杂性。故事讲述是分享叙述的行为,而科学和叙述则代表了构建现实的两种截然不同的方式。科学寻找捕捉世界普遍真理的广泛模式,而叙述则通过人类经验寻找联系,为现实赋予意义和价值。我探讨了这些截然不同的真理观念如何在不同的背景下表现出来,以促进或抵制科学错误信息。我还确定了文献中的差距,并确定了有前途的未来研究领域。尽管存在差异,但科学和叙述的基本目的都是为了理解世界,并在其中找到自己的位置。虽然叙事确实会导致科学错误信息,但叙事也可以通过为现实提供意义来帮助科学对抗错误信息,将准确的科学知识纳入人类经验。

相似文献

1
The narrative truth about scientific misinformation.关于科学错误信息的叙述性真相。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914085117.
3
Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences.运用叙事和讲故事的方式与非专业受众交流科学知识。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13614-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320645111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
6
The Use of Narrative in Science and Health Communication: A Scoping Review.叙事在科学和健康传播中的应用:范围综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Jul;112:107752. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107752. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
7
Misinformation in and about science.科学中的错误信息和围绕科学的错误信息。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912444117.
8
Prescriptive scientific narratives for communicating usable science.用于传达实用科学的规范性科学叙述。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13627-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317502111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

8
Human trafficking and the growing malady of disinformation.人口贩卖和日益严重的虚假信息泛滥。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;10:987159. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.987159. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
(Escaping) the paradox of scientific storytelling.(逃离)科学叙事的悖论。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 9;16(10):e2006720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006720. eCollection 2018 Oct.
9
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.科学家对公众参与沟通目标的优先排序。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验