Intensive Care Unit, Campinas State University-UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Department of Surgery, Campinas State University-UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2021 Apr 9;7(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s41394-021-00396-4.
Retrospective case series.
To compare individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) submitted to transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS) or a standard weaning protocol (SWP) according to the following variables: invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) time, ventilator weaning time, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and overall hospital length of stay.
Tertiary university hospital. Clinical Hospital of Campinas State University-UNICAMP-Campinas (SP), Brazil.
Retrospective case study investigating ICU patients submitted to tracheostomy due to cervical SCI at a tertiary university hospital (Clinical Hospital of Campinas State University, Brazil). Data were extracted from medical records of patients seen between January 2007 and December 2016. According to medical records, four patients were submitted to TEDS and six to a SWP. Provision of training to patients in the TEDS group was based on consensus medical decision, preference of the physical therapy team and availability of electrostimulation equipment in the ICU.
Total IMV time in the TEDS and the SWP group was 33 ± 15 and 60 ± 22 days, respectively. Length of stay in ICU in the TEDS and the SWP group was 31 ± 18 and 63 ± 45 days, respectively.
TEDS appears to influence the duration of IMV as well as the length of stay in ICU. This physiotherapeutic intervention may be a potentially promising tool for treatment of patients with SCI. However, randomized clinical trials are warranted to support this assumption.
回顾性病例系列研究。
根据以下变量比较接受经皮膈神经电刺激(TEDS)或标准脱机方案(SWP)的颈脊髓损伤(SCI)个体:有创机械通气(IMV)时间、呼吸机脱机时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和总住院时间。
三级大学医院。巴西坎皮纳斯州立大学临床医院-UNICAMP-Campinas(SP)。
对三级大学医院(巴西坎皮纳斯州立大学临床医院)因颈 SCI 接受气管切开术的 ICU 患者进行回顾性病例研究。从 2007 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间患者的病历中提取数据。根据病历,4 例患者接受 TEDS,6 例患者接受 SWP。TEDS 组患者的培训是根据共识医疗决策、物理治疗团队的偏好和 ICU 中电刺激设备的可用性提供的。
TEDS 和 SWP 组的总 IMV 时间分别为 33±15 天和 60±22 天。TEDS 和 SWP 组的 ICU 住院时间分别为 31±18 天和 63±45 天。
TEDS 似乎会影响 IMV 时间和 ICU 住院时间。这种物理治疗干预可能是治疗 SCI 患者的有前途的工具。但是,需要进行随机临床试验来支持这一假设。