• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发评估老年人总久坐时间和认知活动相关久坐时间的问卷

Development of a Questionnaire to Evaluate Older Adults' Total Sedentary Time and Sedentary Time With Cognitive Activity.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Gerontology, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, 221156National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Japan.

出版信息

J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2022 May;35(3):392-399. doi: 10.1177/08919887211006468. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1177/08919887211006468
PMID:33840291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9003769/
Abstract

This study aimed to develop a questionnaire for evaluating total sedentary time (ST) and ST with cognitive activity, and to examine the association between ST and cognitive function among Japanese older adults. The questionnaire to evaluate ST comprised 12 items regarding behavior in specific settings, including 8 items on ST with cognitive activity, in a usual week. Older adults aged ≥75 years who participated in a health check-up assessing cognitive function completed the developed questionnaire and subsequently wore an accelerometer and recorded a diary of ST with cognitive activity for a week as validity measures. Cognitive function was assessed with neuropsychological tests covering 4 domains: memory, attention, executive function, and processing speed. Fifty-two participants were included in the validity analysis. Spearman's correlation coefficient indicated fair-to-good agreement between the questionnaire-measured and the diary-measured time for ST with cognitive activity (r = 0.59, p < 0.001), but this was not the case for total ST. Bland-Altman plots showed that the questionnaire-measured total ST contained proportional bias (r = 0.51, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis (n = 49) showed longer questionnaire-measured ST with cognitive activity was significantly associated with better neuropsychological test scores (attention: β = -0.38, p = 0.025; executive function: β = -0.46, p = 0.003; and processing speed: β = 0.31, p = 0.041), while total ST was not associated with better cognitive performance. The developed questionnaire showed acceptable validity to measure ST with cognitive activity, which was found to be protectively associated with cognitive function.

摘要

本研究旨在开发一种评估总 sedentary time (ST) 和认知活动 ST 的问卷,并探讨日本老年人 ST 与认知功能之间的关系。评估 ST 的问卷包括 12 项关于特定环境下行为的项目,其中 8 项涉及认知活动 ST,在一周内完成。参加健康检查评估认知功能的年龄≥75 岁的老年人完成了开发的问卷,随后佩戴加速度计并记录一周的认知活动 ST 日记作为有效性测量。认知功能通过涵盖 4 个领域的神经心理学测试进行评估:记忆、注意力、执行功能和处理速度。52 名参与者被纳入有效性分析。Spearman 相关系数表明,问卷测量的和日记测量的认知活动 ST 时间之间存在良好到极好的一致性(r = 0.59,p < 0.001),但总 ST 则不然。Bland-Altman 图显示,问卷测量的总 ST 存在比例偏差(r = 0.51,p < 0.001)。多元回归分析(n = 49)表明,问卷测量的认知活动 ST 时间较长与神经心理学测试得分更好显著相关(注意力:β = -0.38,p = 0.025;执行功能:β = -0.46,p = 0.003;处理速度:β = 0.31,p = 0.041),而总 ST 与认知表现的改善无关。开发的问卷在测量认知活动 ST 方面具有可接受的有效性,与认知功能呈保护相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfec/9003769/745eada050f5/10.1177_08919887211006468-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfec/9003769/745eada050f5/10.1177_08919887211006468-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfec/9003769/745eada050f5/10.1177_08919887211006468-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a Questionnaire to Evaluate Older Adults' Total Sedentary Time and Sedentary Time With Cognitive Activity.开发评估老年人总久坐时间和认知活动相关久坐时间的问卷
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2022 May;35(3):392-399. doi: 10.1177/08919887211006468. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
2
Older adults' reporting of specific sedentary behaviors: validity and reliability.老年人特定久坐行为的报告:效度和信度。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 21;14:734. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-734.
3
[Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire and bouchard diary in Chinese adults].[国际体力活动问卷和布沙尔日记在中国成年人中的有效性]
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2021 May;50(3):435-441. doi: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2021.03.015.
4
The association between sedentary behavior and cognitive ability in older adults.老年人久坐行为与认知能力的关系。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Nov;32(11):2339-2347. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01460-8. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
5
Concurrent validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire adapted for adults aged ≥ 80 years (IPAQ-E 80 +) - tested with accelerometer data from the SilverMONICA study.成人(≥ 80 岁)适应的国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ-E 80+)的同时效度 - 用 SilverMONICA 研究的加速度计数据进行测试。
Gait Posture. 2022 Feb;92:135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.11.019. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
6
Reliability and validity of the Youth Leisure-time Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (YLSBQ).青少年闲暇时间久坐行为问卷(YLSBQ)的信度和效度
J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Jan;21(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.031. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
7
Associations between physical performance and executive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: gait speed and the timed "up & go" test.老年人轻度认知障碍与执行功能的身体表现关联:步态速度和计时“站起-走”测试。
Phys Ther. 2011 Aug;91(8):1198-207. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100372. Epub 2011 May 26.
8
[Validity and reliability of the Work-related Physical Activity Questionnaire for assessing intensity-specific physical activity and sedentary behavior in the workplace].用于评估工作场所特定强度身体活动和久坐行为的工作相关身体活动问卷的效度和信度
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2020 Mar 25;62(2):61-71. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.2019-013-B. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
9
Validity of Domain-Specific Sedentary Time Using Accelerometer and Questionnaire with activPAL Criterion.使用加速度计和问卷与 activPAL 标准评估特定领域的久坐时间的有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 3;18(23):12774. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312774.
10
Validity of the Past-day Adults' Sedentary Time Questionnaire in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Population.过去一天成年人久坐时间问卷在心脏康复人群中的有效性。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020 Sep;40(5):325-329. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000488.

引用本文的文献

1
Sedentary behavior, cognition, and brain health in older adults: a systematic review.老年人的久坐行为、认知与大脑健康:一项系统综述
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Jul 8;17:1622049. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1622049. eCollection 2025.
2
Within- and Between-Person Differences in Activity Factor Structure: Results From an Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.个体内与个体间活动因素结构差异:一项生态瞬时评估研究的结果
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 Apr 7;80(5). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf017.
3
Sedentary behavior and lifespan brain health.

本文引用的文献

1
Daily sedentary time and physical activity as assessed by accelerometry and their correlates in older adults.通过加速度计评估的老年人每日久坐时间和身体活动及其相关因素。
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2019 Feb 18;16:3. doi: 10.1186/s11556-019-0210-9. eCollection 2019.
2
Cognitive activity in a sitting position is protectively associated with cognitive impairment among older adults.坐姿认知活动与老年人认知障碍呈保护性相关。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019 Feb;19(2):98-102. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13532. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
3
Validity and Reliability of Japanese-Language Self-reported Measures for Assessing Adults Domain-Specific Sedentary Time.
久坐行为与寿命期大脑健康。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Apr;28(4):369-382. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.003. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
4
Development and validity of a mentally-passive and mentally-active sedentary time questionnaire in nursing college students.发展并验证护理专业大学生精神被动和精神主动久坐时间问卷。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 19;11:1180853. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1180853. eCollection 2023.
5
Differential Associations of Total and Context-Specific Sedentary Time with Depressive Symptoms Among Adolescents: Results from Ireland's CSPPA Study.青少年中总久坐时间和特定情境久坐时间与抑郁症状的差异关联:爱尔兰CSPPA研究结果
Int J Behav Med. 2023 Oct;30(5):682-692. doi: 10.1007/s12529-022-10133-2. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
评估成年人特定领域久坐时间的日语自报告测量工具的有效性和可靠性。
J Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 5;28(3):149-155. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20170002. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
4
Comparability of activity monitors used in Asian and Western-country studies for assessing free-living sedentary behaviour.用于评估自由生活中久坐行为的亚洲和西方国家研究中使用的活动监测器的可比性。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 18;12(10):e0186523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186523. eCollection 2017.
5
Sedentary time in older adults: a critical review of measurement, associations with health, and interventions.老年人久坐时间:测量方法、与健康的关联及干预措施的批判性综述。
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;51(21):1539. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097210. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
6
Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome.久坐行为研究网络(SBRN)——术语共识项目的过程与成果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8.
7
Cognitive leisure activities and future risk of cognitive impairment and dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis.认知性休闲活动与认知障碍和痴呆症的未来风险:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Nov;28(11):1791-1806. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001137. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
8
Cognitive Impairment and Disability in Older Japanese Adults.日本老年人群中的认知障碍与残疾
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0158720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158720. eCollection 2016.
9
Less Daily Computer Use is Related to Smaller Hippocampal Volumes in Cognitively Intact Elderly.在认知功能正常的老年人中,每日电脑使用时间减少与海马体体积较小有关。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;52(2):713-7. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160079.
10
Validity of a multi-context sitting questionnaire across demographically diverse population groups: AusDiab3.多情境坐姿问卷在不同人口统计学特征人群中的效度:澳大利亚糖尿病、肥胖与生活方式研究(AusDiab3)
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Dec 4;12:148. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0309-y.