Xu Yaoda
Yale University.
Vis cogn. 2020;28(5-8):433-446. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1818659. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
Recent work has highlighted the role of early visual areas in visual working memory (VWM) storage and put forward a sensory storage account of VWM. Using a distractor interference paradigm, however, we previolsy showed that the contribution of early visual areas to VWM storage may not be essential. Instead, higher cortical regions such as the posterior parietal cortex may play a more significant role in VWM storage. This is consistent with reviews of other available behavioral, neuroimaging and neurophysiology results. Recently, a number of studies brought forward new evidence regarding this debate. Here I review these new pieces of evidence in detail and show that there is still no strong and definitive evidence supporting an essential role of the early visual areas in VWM storage. Instead, converging evidence suggests that early visual areas may contribute to the decision stage of a VWM task by facilitating target and probe comparison. Aside from further clarifying this debate, it is also important to note that whether or not VWM storage uses a sensory code depends on how it is defined, and that behavioral interactions between VWM and perception tasks do not necessarily support the involvement of sensory regions in VWM storage.
近期的研究突出了早期视觉区域在视觉工作记忆(VWM)存储中的作用,并提出了一种关于VWM的感觉存储解释。然而,我们之前使用干扰项干扰范式表明,早期视觉区域对VWM存储的贡献可能并非必不可少。相反,诸如后顶叶皮层等更高层次的皮层区域可能在VWM存储中发挥更重要的作用。这与对其他现有行为、神经影像学和神经生理学结果的综述一致。最近,一些研究提出了关于这场争论的新证据。在此,我详细回顾这些新证据,并表明仍然没有强有力的确凿证据支持早期视觉区域在VWM存储中起关键作用。相反,越来越多的证据表明,早期视觉区域可能通过促进目标与探测刺激的比较,对VWM任务的决策阶段做出贡献。除了进一步澄清这场争论之外,还需要注意的是,VWM存储是否使用感觉编码取决于其定义方式,并且VWM与感知任务之间的行为交互并不一定支持感觉区域参与VWM存储。