Pietersen Pia Iben, Laursen Christian B, Petersen René Horsleben, Konge Lars
Regional Center for Technical Simulation, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Mar;13(3):2058-2067. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.39.
Within the last decade, the number of technical procedures in respiratory medicine and thoracic surgery has grown and created a higher demand for effective and evidence-based education. Today, trainees are often allowed to perform procedures unsupervised on patients after obtaining a course certificate from a theoretic course and having performed a fixed number of supervised procedures. However, these methods do not ensure adequate competence. Well-structured and effective educational programmes including validated tests are needed to reduce economic expenses, optimize time spend, and ensure patient safety. The aim of this article is to summarize current state of educational strategies for technical procedures within respiratory medicine and thoracic surgery. Thus, to discuss future recommendations for curriculum development and assessment of competences based on Kern's framework. The approach by Kern consists of six topics, which needs to be considered and evaluated and in order to educate physicians and surgeons most effective and evidence-based. We present a practical guide contributing to future educators' considerations on (I) problem identification and general needs assessment, (II) targeted needs assessment, (III) goals and objectives, (IV) educational strategies, (V) implementation, and finally (VI) evaluation and feedback.
在过去十年中,呼吸医学和胸外科的技术操作数量不断增加,对有效且基于证据的教育产生了更高的需求。如今,学员在从理论课程获得结业证书并完成一定数量的带教操作后,通常被允许在无监督的情况下对患者进行操作。然而,这些方法并不能确保足够的能力。需要精心设计且有效的教育项目,包括经过验证的测试,以减少经济开支、优化时间利用并确保患者安全。本文的目的是总结呼吸医学和胸外科技术操作教育策略的现状。因此,基于克恩的框架讨论课程开发和能力评估的未来建议。克恩的方法包括六个主题,为了最有效且基于证据地培养内科医生和外科医生,需要对这些主题进行考量和评估。我们提供一份实用指南,有助于未来教育工作者在以下方面进行考量:(I)问题识别与一般需求评估,(II)针对性需求评估,(III)目标与目的,(IV)教育策略,(V)实施,以及最后(VI)评估与反馈。