Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Sdr. Boulevard 29, entrance 87, 1st floor, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Regional Center for Technical Simulation, Odense University Hospital, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Feb 25;29(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00856-8.
In a prehospital setting, the severity of respiratory symptoms in patients calling for an ambulance differ. The initial evaluation, diagnosing, and thereby management can be challenging because respiratory symptoms can be caused by disease in many organs. Ultrasound examinations can contribute with important information and support the clinical decision-making. However, ultrasound is user-dependent and requires sufficient knowledge and training. The aim of this study was to explore the quality of thoracic ultrasound examinations performed on patients by emergency medical technicians and paramedics in a prehospital, clinical setting.
From November 2018 - April 2020, Danish emergency medical technicians and paramedics (n = 100) performed thoracic ultrasound examinations on patients with respiratory symptoms using a portable ultrasound device. The ultrasound examinations were stored and retrospectively assessed by a reviewer blinded to the patients' symptoms and history, as well as the emergency medical technicians' and paramedics' findings. The image quality was scored from 1 to 5. The findings determined by the reviewer was then correlated with a questionnaire filled out by the emergency medical technicians and paramedics regarding ultrasonic findings and potential change in treatment or management of the patient. The agreement in percentage and as Cohen's kappa was explored.
A total of 590 ultrasound examinations were assessed, resulting in a median image quality score of 3 (IQ1 = 4, IQ3 = 3). The overall agreement in percentage between the emergency medical technicians and paramedics and reviewer was high (87.7% for a normal scan, 89.9% for interstitial syndrome, 97.3% for possible pneumothorax, and 96.3% for pleural effusion). Cohen's kappa varied from 0.01 for possible pneumothorax to 0.69 for pleural effusion. Based on the questionnaires (n = 406), the ultrasound examination entailed a change in treatment or visitation in 48 cases (11.7%) which in this study population encompasses a number-needed-to-scan of 8.5.
Emergency medical technicians and paramedics perform focused thoracic ultrasound examinations with adequate image quality sufficient to determine if pathology is present or not. The emergency medical technicians' and paramedics' assessment correlates to some extent with an experienced reviewer and their findings are most reliable for the inclusion of a normal scan or inclusion of pleural effusion. Implementation could possibly impact the number of patients receiving correct prehospital treatment and optimal choice of receiving facility.
在院前环境中,呼叫救护车的患者的呼吸症状严重程度存在差异。由于呼吸症状可能由许多器官的疾病引起,因此初始评估、诊断和管理可能具有挑战性。超声检查可以提供重要信息,并支持临床决策。然而,超声检查是依赖于使用者的,并且需要有足够的知识和培训。本研究的目的是探讨在院前临床环境中,急救医疗技术员和护理人员对呼吸症状患者进行的胸腔超声检查的质量。
自 2018 年 11 月至 2020 年 4 月,丹麦急救医疗技术员和护理人员(n=100)使用便携式超声设备对呼吸症状患者进行了胸腔超声检查。超声检查被存储起来,并由一位对患者症状、病史以及急救医疗技术员和护理人员的发现均不知情的审核员进行回顾性评估。图像质量评分从 1 到 5 分。审核员确定的结果与急救医疗技术员和护理人员填写的关于超声发现以及患者治疗或管理的潜在变化的问卷相关联。以百分比和 Cohen's kappa 探索一致性。
共评估了 590 次超声检查,中位数图像质量评分为 3 分(IQ1=4,IQ3=3)。急救医疗技术员和护理人员与审核员的总体一致性百分比很高(正常扫描为 87.7%,间质性综合征为 89.9%,可能的气胸为 97.3%,胸腔积液为 96.3%)。Cohen's kappa 值在可能的气胸为 0.01,在胸腔积液为 0.69 之间变化。根据问卷(n=406),超声检查导致 48 例(11.7%)治疗或就诊发生变化,在本研究人群中,需要扫描的数量为 8.5。
急救医疗技术员和护理人员进行了有针对性的胸腔超声检查,图像质量足以确定是否存在病理情况。急救医疗技术员和护理人员的评估在某种程度上与有经验的审核员相关联,并且他们的发现对于包括正常扫描或包括胸腔积液最可靠。实施后可能会影响到接受正确院前治疗的患者数量以及选择最佳接收机构的机会。