Triplett Craig R, Dorrel Bryan S, Symonds Matthew L, Selland Corey A, Jensen Daniel D, Poole Christopher N
Black Hills State University.
Highland Community College.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Apr 1;16(2):450-458. doi: 10.26603/001c.19443.
The Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) is a popular test used by sports medicine professionals to identify dysfunctional movement patterns by analyzing mobility and stability during prescribed movements. Although the FMS™ has been a popular topic of research in recent years, normative data and asymmetries in college-aged students have not been established through research.
The objective was to determine normative FMS™ scores, report frequency counts for FMS™ asymmetries, and determine if the number of sports seasons and number of different sports an individual participated in during high school varied between university students that showed FMS™ identified asymmetries.
Cross-sectional Study.
One hundred university students completed the FMS™ and an associated survey to determine which sport(s) and for how many seasons they participated in each sport(s) during high school. Total FMS™ scores were assessed as well as identifying the presence of an asymmetry during a FMS™ screen. An asymmetry within the FMS™ was defined as achieving an unequal score on any of the screens that assessed right versus left movements of the body.
Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation was utilized to investigate the relationship between number of sports played and number of sport seasons. Shapiro Wilk test for normality, and Mann Whitney U test was employed to investigate group differences in number of sports played. All analyses were conducted using SPSS software.
Statistically significant correlations (r = .286, r = .08, p < 0.01) were found for both number of sport seasons and number of sports with FMS™ total score. In addition, participants without FMS™-detected asymmetries played significantly more seasons and more sports than their peers that presented asymmetries (U = 946.5, z = -1.98, p = 0.047). Finish with the actual p-value in parenthesis.
Participating in multiple sports and multiple sport seasons during high school was associated with higher FMS™ total scores. Results suggest that participating in multiple sports and multiple sport seasons was associated with fewer asymmetries, which may decrease subsequent injury risk.
3b.
功能性动作筛查（FMS™）是运动医学专业人员常用的一项测试，通过分析规定动作中的灵活性和稳定性来识别功能失调的动作模式。尽管近年来FMS™一直是热门研究话题，但尚未通过研究确定大学生的规范数据和不对称情况。
本研究旨在确定FMS™的规范分数，报告FMS™不对称情况的频率计数，并确定在高中阶段参加的运动赛季数量和不同运动项目数量在FMS™筛查显示存在不对称的大学生之间是否存在差异。
横断面研究。
100名大学生完成了FMS™测试及相关调查，以确定他们在高中时参加了哪些运动项目以及每个运动项目的赛季数。评估了FMS™的总分，并在FMS™筛查过程中确定是否存在不对称情况。FMS™中的不对称定义为在评估身体左右运动的任何一个筛查项目中获得不相等的分数。
数据分析包括描述性统计，使用Pearson相关性分析来研究运动项目数量和运动赛季数之间的关系。采用Shapiro Wilk正态性检验，并使用Mann Whitney U检验来研究运动项目数量的组间差异。所有分析均使用SPSS软件进行。
运动赛季数和运动项目数量与FMS™总分之间均存在统计学显著相关性（r = 0.286，r = 0.08，p < 0.01）。此外，未检测到FMS™不对称的参与者比存在不对称的同龄人参加的赛季和运动项目明显更多（U = 946.5，z = -1.98，p = 0.047）。（括号内为实际p值）
高中阶段参加多项运动和多个运动赛季与较高的FMS™总分相关。结果表明，参加多项运动和多个运动赛季与较少的不对称情况相关，这可能会降低后续受伤风险。
3b。
