Gérontopôle de Toulouse, Institut du Vieillissement, CHU de Toulouse, France.
UMR INSERM 1295, Université Toulouse III, France.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021 Jul 13;76(8):1369-1375. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab112.
This study aimed to determine whether visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) is associated with incident frailty. We included 1 394 nonfrail community-dwelling participants aged ≥70 years from the Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial (MAPT) who underwent repeated clinical examinations, including BP and frailty, over a 5-year follow-up period. Systolic BPV (SBPV), diastolic BPV (DBPV), mean arterial pressure variability (MAPV), and pulse pressure variability (PPV) were evaluated using standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), average real variability, successive variation, variation independent of mean, and residual SD. Incident frailty was assessed using the Fried phenotype. Cox proportional hazards models were used for the analyses. Higher SBPV was significantly associated with greater risk of frailty (1-SD increase of CV: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.36) after adjustment for demographics, systolic BP, antihypertensive drugs, body mass index, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, stroke, atrial fibrillation, MAPT randomization group, and frailty status. Similar results were observed with all indicators of variability. Higher PPV was associated with a greater risk of developing frailty over time (1-SD increase of CV: HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01-1.35). DBPV and MAPV were not significantly associated with incident frailty. Higher SBPV and PPV were associated with greater risk of incident frailty. Our findings support the concept of BP physiological dysregulation underlying the frail state and suggest that BP instability could be an early marker of frailty.
本研究旨在确定血压变异性(BPV)与虚弱症的发生是否有关。我们纳入了来自多领域阿尔茨海默病预防试验(MAPT)的 1394 名年龄≥70 岁的非虚弱社区居住参与者,这些参与者在 5 年的随访期间接受了多次临床检查,包括血压和虚弱评估。采用标准差(SD)、变异系数(CV)、平均真实变异、连续变异、均值独立变异和剩余 SD 评估收缩压变异(SBPV)、舒张压变异(DBPV)、平均动脉压变异(MAPV)和脉压变异(PPV)。使用 Fried 表型评估虚弱症的发生。采用 Cox 比例风险模型进行分析。校正人口统计学、收缩压、降压药物、体重指数、糖尿病、缺血性心脏病、充血性心力衰竭、中风、心房颤动、MAPT 随机分组和虚弱状态后,较高的 SBPV 与虚弱风险增加显著相关(CV 增加 1-SD:风险比[HR]=1.18,95%置信区间[CI]:1.02-1.36)。所有变异指标均观察到类似结果。较高的 PPV 与随着时间推移发生虚弱的风险增加相关(CV 增加 1-SD:HR=1.17,95%CI:1.01-1.35)。DBPV 和 MAPV 与虚弱症的发生无显著相关性。较高的 SBPV 和 PPV 与虚弱症的发生风险增加相关。我们的研究结果支持了脆弱状态下血压生理失调的概念,并表明血压不稳定可能是虚弱的早期标志物。