• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帕斯卡氏眼病分类标准。

Classification Criteria For Pars Planitis.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:268-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.045. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.045
PMID:33845006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8634775/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine classification criteria for pars planitis.

DESIGN

Machine learning of cases with pars planitis and 4 other intermediate uveitides.

METHODS

Cases of intermediate uveitides were collected in an informatics-designed preliminary database, and a final database was constructed of cases achieving supermajority agreement on the diagnosis, using formal consensus techniques. Cases were split into a training set and a validation set. Machine learning using multinomial logistic regression was used on the training set to determine a parsimonious set of criteria that minimized the misclassification rate among the intermediate uveitides. The resulting criteria were evaluated on the validation set.

RESULTS

Five hundred eighty-nine cases of intermediate uveitides, including 226 cases of pars planitis, were evaluated by machine learning. The overall accuracy for intermediate uveitides was 99.8% in the training set and 99.3% in the validation set (95% confidence interval 96.1, 99.9). Key criteria for pars planitis included unilateral or bilateral intermediate uveitis with either 1) snowballs in the vitreous or 2) snowbanks on the pars plana. Key exclusions included: 1) multiple sclerosis, 2) sarcoidosis, and 3) syphilis. The misclassification rates for pars planitis were 0% in the training set and 1.7% in the validation set, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The criteria for pars planitis had a low misclassification rate and appeared to perform sufficiently well for use in clinical and translational research.

摘要

目的

确定中间葡萄膜炎中 pars 燐光炎的分类标准。

设计

使用机器学习对 pars 燐光炎和其他 4 种中间葡萄膜炎病例进行分析。

方法

通过信息学设计的初步数据库收集中间葡萄膜炎病例,并使用正式共识技术对诊断达成多数共识的病例构建最终数据库。将病例分为训练集和验证集。使用多项逻辑回归对训练集进行机器学习,以确定一组简化的标准,使中间葡萄膜炎的分类错误率最小化。然后在验证集上评估得出的标准。

结果

对 589 例中间葡萄膜炎病例(包括 226 例 pars 燐光炎)进行了机器学习评估。训练集中中间葡萄膜炎的总体准确率为 99.8%,验证集中为 99.3%(95%置信区间 96.1,99.9)。 pars 燐光炎的关键标准包括单侧或双侧中间葡萄膜炎,伴有 1)玻璃体雪球状混浊或 2)后极部雪堤样改变。关键排除标准包括:1)多发性硬化症,2)结节病,和 3)梅毒。训练集中 pars 燐光炎的分类错误率为 0%,验证集中为 1.7%。

结论

pars 燐光炎的分类标准错误率较低,似乎足以用于临床和转化研究。

相似文献

1
Classification Criteria For Pars Planitis.帕斯卡氏眼病分类标准。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:268-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.045. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
Classification Criteria for Intermediate Uveitis, Non-Pars Planitis Type.中间葡萄膜炎,非结节性视网膜血管炎型的分类标准。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.054. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
3
Classification Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis-Associated Intermediate Uveitis.多发性硬化相关性中间葡萄膜炎的分类标准。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.044. Epub 2021 May 11.
4
Classification Criteria for Syphilitic Uveitis.梅毒性葡萄膜炎的分类标准。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.039. Epub 2021 May 11.
5
Classification Criteria for Sarcoidosis-Associated Uveitis.结节病相关性葡萄膜炎的分类标准。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:220-230. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.047. Epub 2021 May 11.
6
Classification Criteria for Spondyloarthritis/HLA-B27-Associated Anterior Uveitis.脊柱关节炎/与 HLA-B27 相关的前葡萄膜炎的分类标准。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.049. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
Classification Criteria for Varicella Zoster Virus Anterior Uveitis.水痘带状疱疹病毒前葡萄膜炎的分类标准。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.037. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
8
Classification Criteria for Cytomegalovirus Anterior Uveitis.巨细胞病毒前葡萄膜炎的分类标准。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.060. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
9
Classification Criteria for Punctate Inner Choroiditis.点状内层脉络膜炎的分类标准。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.046. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
10
Classification Criteria for Multifocal Choroiditis With Panuveitis.多灶性脉络膜炎伴全葡萄膜炎的分类标准。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.043. Epub 2021 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Uveitis: Innovations in Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies.葡萄膜炎中的人工智能:诊断与治疗策略的创新
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 14;18:3753-3766. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S495307. eCollection 2024.
2
Sarcoidosis-Related Uveitis: A Review.结节病相关性葡萄膜炎综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 29;12(9):3194. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093194.
3
The role of a multicentre data repository in ocular inflammation: The Ocular Autoimmune Systemic Inflammatory Infectious Study (OASIS).多中心数据存储库在眼部炎症中的作用:眼自身免疫系统性炎症感染研究(OASIS)。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Oct;37(15):3084-3096. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02472-5. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
4
The standardisation of uveitis nomenclature (SUN) project.葡萄膜炎命名标准化(SUN)项目
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 27. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14175.
5
The Conundrum of Clinical Trials for the Uveitides: Appropriate Outcome Measures for One Treatment Used in Several Diseases.葡萄膜炎临床试验的难题:一种治疗方法用于多种疾病的适当疗效指标。
Epidemiol Rev. 2022 Dec 21;44(1):2-16. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxac001.

本文引用的文献

1
Reply to Comment on: Classification Criteria for Behçet Disease Uveitis.对《白塞病葡萄膜炎分类标准》评论的回复
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar;235:339-340. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.10.020. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
2
Classification Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis-Associated Intermediate Uveitis.多发性硬化相关性中间葡萄膜炎的分类标准。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;228:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.044. Epub 2021 May 11.
3
Usefulness of Routine Lyme Screening in Patients with Uveitis.葡萄膜炎患者常规莱姆病筛查的效用
Ophthalmology. 2019 Dec;126(12):1726-1728. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
4
Peripheral Findings and Retinal Vascular Leakage on Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography in Patients with Uveitis.葡萄膜炎患者超广角荧光素血管造影的周边表现及视网膜血管渗漏
Ophthalmol Retina. 2017 Sep-Oct;1(5):428-434. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 May 9.
5
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria.多发性硬化症的诊断:2017 年麦当劳标准修订版。
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-173. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
6
Interobserver Agreement Among Uveitis Experts on Uveitic Diagnoses: The Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Experience.葡萄膜炎专家间对葡萄膜炎诊断的一致性:葡萄膜炎命名标准经验。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;186:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
7
Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography in Intermediate Uveitis.超广角荧光素血管造影在中间葡萄膜炎中的应用。
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2019;27(3):356-361. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2017.1371764. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
8
No Value for Routine Serologic Screening for Borrelia burgdorferi in Patients With Uveitis in the Netherlands.荷兰葡萄膜炎患者中对伯氏疏螺旋体进行常规血清学筛查无价值。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun;166:189-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
9
Intermediate uveitis and multiple sclerosis: to scan or not to scan.中间葡萄膜炎与多发性硬化症:是否进行扫描检查
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;99(12):1591-3. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307269. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
10
Distinctions between diagnostic and classification criteria?诊断标准和分类标准之间的区别?
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Jul;67(7):891-7. doi: 10.1002/acr.22583.