Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2021 Sep;25:80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.12.001. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
Discrete choice experiment (DCE) has been increasingly used in studies investigating preferences of the health workforce. This pilot study aimed to provide a comprehensive protocol for design and quality assessment of a DCE to elicit preferences of general practitioners for the choice of specialty.
We conducted 3 rigorous qualitative studies, including a review of literature, qualitative interviews, and focus group discussion to develop attributes and levels of the DCE. Then a D-efficient fractional factorial design was applied to generate choice tasks and to block them into 4 equal versions using SAS software. Two hundred and forty general practitioners participated in a pilot study conducted to evaluate the quality of the instrument using 7 tests.
The qualitative studies resulted in the development of 8 attributes and 24 levels. Experimental design led to the generation of 36 choice tasks divided into 4 blocks. The pilot study revealed that the instrument has validity and reliability and also indicated that the design is comprehensible and feasible.
This study provided an integrated, comprehensive framework for development and quality assessment of a DCE that could be used in other studies. The pilot study indicated that the instrument is of sufficient quality because it was developed using rigorous qualitative studies and accurate experimental design method.
离散选择实验(DCE)已越来越多地应用于研究卫生人力偏好的研究中。本初步研究旨在提供一个全面的方案,用于设计和质量评估 DCE,以了解全科医生对专业选择的偏好。
我们进行了 3 项严格的定性研究,包括文献回顾、定性访谈和焦点小组讨论,以制定 DCE 的属性和水平。然后使用 SAS 软件应用 D-有效分数阶析因设计来生成选择任务,并将其分成 4 个相等的版本。240 名全科医生参加了一项初步研究,使用 7 项测试来评估工具的质量。
定性研究产生了 8 个属性和 24 个水平。实验设计导致生成了 36 个选择任务,分为 4 个块。初步研究表明,该工具具有有效性和可靠性,并且设计是可理解和可行的。
本研究为 DCE 的开发和质量评估提供了一个综合的、全面的框架,可用于其他研究。初步研究表明,该工具具有足够的质量,因为它是使用严格的定性研究和准确的实验设计方法开发的。