Lifespan Developmental Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Department of Neurology, Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London, UK; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Center of Mental Health, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Translational Neuromodeling Unit, University of Zurich & ETH Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Psychiatry, University of Basel, Switzerland; Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), University of Toronto, Canada.
Neurobiol Aging. 2021 Jul;103:98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.01.034. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
Decoding others' intentions accurately in order to adapt one's own behavior is pivotal throughout life. In this study, we asked how younger and older adults deal with uncertainty in dynamic social environments. We used an advice-taking paradigm together with Bayesian modeling to characterize effects of aging on learning about others' time-varying intentions. We observed age differences when comparing learning on two levels of social uncertainty: the fidelity of the adviser and the volatility of intentions. Older adults expected the adviser to change his/her intentions more frequently (i.e., a higher volatility of the adviser). They also showed higher confidence (i.e., precision) in their volatility beliefs and were less willing to change their beliefs about volatility over the course of the experiment. This led them to update their predictions about the fidelity of the adviser more quickly. Potentially indicative of stereotype effects, we observed that older advisers were perceived as more volatile, but also more faithful than younger advisers. This offers new insights into adult age differences in response to social uncertainty.
准确解读他人意图并相应调整自身行为对人的一生都非常重要。在本研究中,我们探讨了年轻人和老年人如何应对动态社会环境中的不确定性。我们采用了一种咨询接受范式,结合贝叶斯模型来描述年龄对学习他人时变意图的影响。通过比较两种社会不确定性水平(咨询师的可信度和意图的波动性),我们观察到了年龄差异。相较于年轻人,老年人更倾向于认为咨询师会更频繁地改变其意图(即咨询师的意图波动更高)。他们对自身意图波动的置信度(即精度)更高,在实验过程中更不愿意改变对波动的信念。这使得他们对咨询师可信度的预测更新得更快。可能表明存在刻板印象效应,我们发现相较于年轻的咨询师,老年人咨询师被认为更具波动性,但也更值得信赖。这为理解成年人对社会不确定性的反应中的年龄差异提供了新的视角。