Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Level 10, East Tower, 410 Ann Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Apr 12;20(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01433-2.
Measurement of patients' healthcare experiences is increasingly used as an indicator of quality of care, but there are concerns that existing measures omit information that is meaningful to patients and that results may not be used systematically to inform service improvement. Further, current approaches may be inadequate for some population groups, such as Indigenous people in Australia, whose healthcare experience is impacted by the context of colonisation and discordance between Indigenous understandings of health and the Western biomedical health system. This study aimed to assess the extent to which existing patient experience measures used in Australia collect information about critical aspects of cancer care, as previously identified by Indigenous people affected by cancer and their health care providers.
A two-stage process was used to examine the adequacy of existing patient experience measures for Indigenous people in Australia: (1) relevant tools and measures were identified and assessed, and four measures selected as suitable comparators; (2) comparators were examined in detail and mapped against topics identified in earlier research as important to Indigenous people with cancer. Gaps in topic coverage in comparators were identified.
No comparators completely captured the critical aspects of cancer care identified by Indigenous people affected by cancer and their health care providers. The number of topics 'partially' captured by the four comparators ranged from 4 to 7 out of 9. While most topics were partially covered, the lack of questions around culture and cultural safety was notable.
Existing tools are likely to miss key aspects of Indigenous peoples' experiences of cancer care in Australia. Failure to adequately assess care experiences related to cultural safety may compromise efforts to improve health outcomes. Addressing gaps requires development of experience measures that are strengths-based, reflect an Indigenous worldview and measure aspects of experience relevant to Indigenous people.
越来越多的患者医疗体验测量被用作医疗质量的指标,但人们担心现有的测量方法忽略了对患者有意义的信息,并且结果可能没有被系统地用于改善服务。此外,目前的方法可能不适合某些人群,例如澳大利亚的原住民,他们的医疗体验受到殖民背景和原住民对健康的理解与西方生物医学健康系统之间的不和谐的影响。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚现有的患者体验测量方法在多大程度上收集了癌症护理关键方面的信息,这些信息是以前受癌症影响的原住民及其医疗保健提供者确定的。
采用两阶段的方法来评估澳大利亚原住民现有的患者体验测量方法的充分性:(1)确定并评估相关的工具和测量方法,并选择四项适合的测量方法作为对照;(2)详细检查对照,并将其映射到早期研究中确定的对癌症原住民重要的主题。对照中主题涵盖的差距被确定。
没有任何对照完全捕捉到受癌症影响的原住民及其医疗保健提供者确定的癌症护理关键方面。四个对照中,有 4 到 7 个主题“部分”涵盖了 9 个主题。虽然大多数主题都被部分涵盖,但缺乏关于文化和文化安全的问题值得注意。
现有的工具可能会遗漏澳大利亚原住民癌症护理体验的关键方面。未能充分评估与文化安全相关的护理体验可能会影响改善健康结果的努力。要解决这些差距,需要开发基于优势、反映原住民世界观并衡量与原住民相关的体验方面的体验测量工具。