Department of Educational Sciences (DISFOR), University of Genoa, Corso Andrea Podestà, 2, 16128, Genova, GE, Italy.
Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, Milan, Italy.
Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Mar;27(2):495-504. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01183-8. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
To compare community girls at risk and not at risk for binge eating (BE) in attachment representations through a narrative interview and to test the predictive role of attachment pattern(s) on the risk of binge eating among community girls.
From 772 community adolescents of both sexes (33% boys) screened through the Binge Eating Scale (BES), 112 girls between 14 and 18 years, 56 placed in a group at risk for binge eating (BEG), and 56 matched peers, not at risk (NBEG), were assessed in attachment representations through the Friends and Family Interview (FFI).
(1) Compared to NBEG, girls in the BEG showed more insecure-preoccupied classifications and scores, together with lower narrative coherence, mother's representation as a secure base/safe haven, reflective functioning, adaptive response, and more anger toward mother. (2) Both insecure-dismissing and preoccupied patterns predicted 15% more binge-eating symptoms in the whole sample of community girls.
Insecure attachment representations are confirmed risk factors for more binge eating, affecting emotional regulation and leading to "emotional eating", thus a dimensional assessment of attachment could be helpful for prevention and intervention. Implications and limits are discussed.
III. Evidence obtained from cohort or case-control analytic studies.
通过叙事访谈比较有风险和无风险的社区女孩在进食障碍(BE)中的依恋表现,并检验依恋模式对社区女孩暴食风险的预测作用。
从通过暴食量表(BES)筛选出的 772 名社区青少年(33%为男性)中,选择了 112 名 14 至 18 岁的女孩,将 56 名处于暴食风险(BEG)的女孩和 56 名无风险(NBEG)的女孩同伴纳入研究。通过朋友和家庭访谈(FFI)评估依恋表现。
(1)与 NBEG 相比,BEG 组的女孩表现出更多不安全依恋的分类和得分,同时表现出较低的叙事连贯性、母亲作为安全基地/避风港的代表性、反射功能、适应性反应,以及对母亲更多的愤怒。(2)不安全型和依恋型两种模式都预测了社区女孩暴食症状增加了 15%。
不安全的依恋表现被证实是暴食的风险因素,影响情绪调节并导致“情绪化进食”,因此对依恋的维度评估可能有助于预防和干预。讨论了意义和限制。
III. 来自队列或病例对照分析研究的证据。