• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的评估记忆中源存储的范式:再认的源识别测试。

A novel paradigm to assess storage of sources in memory: the source recognition test with reinstatement.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Memory. 2021 Apr;29(4):507-523. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1910310. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2021.1910310
PMID:33847239
Abstract

The present research aimed to devise a test of source recognition that facilitates access to source information stored in memory. Therefore, we extended the standard source-monitoring paradigm, in which items are presented in a source-neutral manner during test, by a second, subsequent test with source reinstatement. In this second test, items (i.e., words) were presented with both study sources (i.e., two speakers) consecutively such that for originally studied words, one test presentation was the exact reinstatement of the original source. To validate our assumption that the test with reinstatement primarily assesses source storage, we manipulated source storage by varying encoding frequency between-participants (repetition vs. no repetition of each item-source-pair). Additionally, we varied source similarity between-participants (similar vs. dissimilar speakers). Data analyses ( = 146) based on multinomial and signal detection models showed a source memory enhancement in the second test with reinstatement compared to the first standard test, especially for similar sources. Additionally, repetition selectively benefited source memory in the second test, validating our interpretation of the second test as a measure for source storage. Altogether, our novel source recognition test offers a promising method for investigating various well-known source memory phenomena more comprehensively.

摘要

本研究旨在设计一种源识别测试,以方便访问存储在记忆中的源信息。因此,我们扩展了标准的源监测范式,即在测试中以源中立的方式呈现项目,通过第二次随后的源恢复测试。在第二次测试中,项目(即单词)与两个学习源(即两个说话者)连续呈现,使得对于最初学习的单词,一个测试呈现是原始源的完全恢复。为了验证我们的假设,即具有恢复的测试主要评估源存储,我们通过在参与者之间改变编码频率(重复与不重复每个项目-源对)来操纵源存储。此外,我们在参与者之间改变源相似性(相似说话者与不相似说话者)。基于多项和信号检测模型的数据分析(n=146)表明,与第一次标准测试相比,具有恢复的第二次测试中的源记忆增强,特别是对于相似的源。此外,重复在第二次测试中选择性地有益于源记忆,验证了我们对第二次测试作为源存储测量的解释。总的来说,我们新颖的源识别测试为更全面地研究各种著名的源记忆现象提供了一种有前途的方法。

相似文献

1
A novel paradigm to assess storage of sources in memory: the source recognition test with reinstatement.一种新的评估记忆中源存储的范式:再认的源识别测试。
Memory. 2021 Apr;29(4):507-523. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1910310. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
2
Source reinstatement in item-method directed forgetting influences recognition strategies.源项再认在项目-方法定向遗忘中影响识别策略。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Sep;76(3):193-200. doi: 10.1037/cep0000288. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
3
Preexperimental stimulus familiarity modulates the effects of item repetition on source memory.预实验刺激的熟悉度调节了项目重复对来源记忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Mar;46(3):539-548. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000743. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
4
Pure-list production improves item recognition and sometimes also improves source memory.纯列表产生能提高项目识别能力,有时也能提高来源记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Oct;48(7):1281-1294. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01044-2.
5
Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.源记忆监测中的元记忆预期错觉与图式一致猜测
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Mar;45(3):470-496. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000602. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
6
Cortical Overlap and Cortical-Hippocampal Interactions Predict Subsequent True and False Memory.皮质重叠和皮质-海马相互作用预测随后的真实和虚假记忆。
J Neurosci. 2020 Feb 26;40(9):1920-1930. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1766-19.2020. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
7
The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis.识别记忆的不等方差信号检测模型:检验编码变异性假设。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Aug;73(8):1242-1260. doi: 10.1177/1747021820906117. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
8
Emotionally enhanced memory for negatively arousing words: storage or retrieval advantage?对负性唤起词汇的情绪增强记忆:存储优势还是提取优势?
Cogn Emot. 2017 Dec;31(8):1557-1570. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1242477. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
9
Sleep deprivation impairs binding of information with its context.睡眠剥夺会损害信息与其上下文的绑定。
Sleep. 2021 Aug 13;44(8). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsab113.
10
Remembering the place with the tiger: Survival processing can enhance source memory.记住有老虎的地方:生存加工可以增强源记忆。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):667-673. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1431-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Selecting learning partners: memory for participation and competence.选择学习伙伴:对参与度和能力的记忆。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 3;10(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00656-z.
2
Does sleep benefit source memory? Investigating 12-h retention intervals with a multinomial modeling approach.睡眠对源记忆有益吗?采用多项式建模方法研究12小时的保持间隔。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb;53(2):467-493. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01579-8. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
3
Does context recollection depend on the base-rate of contextual features?语境回忆是否依赖于语境特征的基础率?
Cogn Process. 2024 Feb;25(1):9-35. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01153-1. Epub 2023 Sep 11.