• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中耳手术后混合性听力损失患者主动式中耳植入的结果:一项前瞻性多中心研究(罗密欧研究)。

Results of Active Middle Ear Implantation in Patients With Mixed Hearing Loss After Middle Ear Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study (the ROMEO Study).

作者信息

Song Chan Il, Cho Hyong-Ho, Choi Byung Yoon, Choi Jae Young, Choi Jin Woong, Choung Yun-Hoon, Chung Jong Woo, Chung Won-Ho, Hong Sung Hwa, Kim Yehree, Lee Byung Don, Lee Il-Woo, Lee Jong Dae, Lee Jun Ho, Lee Kyu-Yup, Moon Il Joon, Moon In Seok, Oh Seung-Ha, Park Hong Ju, Park Shi Nae, Seo Ji Won

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Feb;15(1):69-76. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2020.01851. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

DOI:10.21053/ceo.2020.01851
PMID:33848418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8901952/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to evaluate the user satisfaction, efficacy, and safety of round window (RW) vibroplasty using the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) in patients with persistent mixed hearing loss after mastoidectomy.

METHODS

The study included 27 patients (mean age, 58.7 years; age range, 28-76 years; 11 men and 16 women) with mixed hearing loss after mastoidectomy from 15 tertiary referral centers in Korea. The VSB was implanted at the RW. The Korean translation of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire and the Korean version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (K-IOI-HA) questionnaire were used to evaluate user satisfaction as the primary outcome. The secondary outcome measures were audiological test results and complication rates.

RESULTS

The mean scores for ease of communication (61.3% to 29.7% to 30.2%), reverberation (62.1% to 43.1% to 37.4%), and background noise (63.3% to 37.7% to 34.3%) subscales of the APHAB questionnaire significantly decreased after VSB surgery. The mean K-IOI-HA scores at 3 and 6 months after surgery were significantly higher than the mean preoperative score (18.6 to 27.2 to 28.1). The postoperative VSB-aided thresholds were significantly lower than the preoperative unaided and hearing aid (HA)-aided thresholds. There was no significant difference between preoperative unaided, preoperative HA-aided, and postoperative VSB-aided maximum phonetically balanced word-recognition scores. None of the 27 patients experienced a change in postoperative bone conduction pure tone average. One patient developed temporary facial palsy and two developed surgical wound infections.

CONCLUSION

RW vibroplasty resulted in improved satisfaction and audiological test results in patients with mixed hearing loss after mastoidectomy, and the complication rate was tolerable.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在乳突切除术后持续性混合性听力损失患者中使用振动声桥(VSB)进行圆窗(RW)振动成形术的用户满意度、疗效和安全性。

方法

该研究纳入了来自韩国15个三级转诊中心的27例乳突切除术后混合性听力损失患者(平均年龄58.7岁;年龄范围28 - 76岁;男性11例,女性16例)。VSB植入于圆窗。使用助听器效益简表(APHAB)问卷的韩文版和国际助听器结果量表(K - IOI - HA)问卷的韩文版来评估用户满意度作为主要结局。次要结局指标为听力学测试结果和并发症发生率。

结果

VSB手术后,APHAB问卷中沟通便利性(从61.3%降至29.7%再降至30.2%)、混响(从62.1%降至43.1%再降至37.4%)和背景噪声(从63.3%降至37.7%再降至34.3%)子量表的平均得分显著降低。术后3个月和6个月时K - IOI - HA的平均得分显著高于术前平均得分(从18.6升至27.2再升至28.1)。术后VSB辅助阈值显著低于术前未辅助和助听器(HA)辅助阈值。术前未辅助、术前HA辅助和术后VSB辅助的最大语音平衡单词识别得分之间无显著差异。27例患者术后骨导纯音平均听阈均未发生变化。1例患者出现暂时性面瘫,2例发生手术伤口感染。

结论

乳突切除术后混合性听力损失患者进行圆窗振动成形术可提高满意度并改善听力学测试结果,且并发症发生率可接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93fe/8901952/f5f0a3222177/ceo-2020-01851f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93fe/8901952/eece697030b4/ceo-2020-01851f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93fe/8901952/0069326aa5f0/ceo-2020-01851f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93fe/8901952/3b166d0cfa13/ceo-2020-01851f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93fe/8901952/f5f0a3222177/ceo-2020-01851f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93fe/8901952/eece697030b4/ceo-2020-01851f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93fe/8901952/0069326aa5f0/ceo-2020-01851f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93fe/8901952/3b166d0cfa13/ceo-2020-01851f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93fe/8901952/f5f0a3222177/ceo-2020-01851f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Results of Active Middle Ear Implantation in Patients With Mixed Hearing Loss After Middle Ear Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study (the ROMEO Study).中耳手术后混合性听力损失患者主动式中耳植入的结果:一项前瞻性多中心研究(罗密欧研究)。
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Feb;15(1):69-76. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2020.01851. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
2
[Multicenter Clinical Study of Vibrant Soundbridge in Japan: Analysis of Subjective Questionnaires].[日本振动声桥多中心临床研究:主观问卷分析]
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 2015 Nov;118(11):1309-18. doi: 10.3950/jibiinkoka.118.1309.
3
Outcome of vibrant soundbridge middle ear implant in cantonese-speaking mixed hearing loss adults.粤语混合性听力损失成年人中动感声桥中耳植入的结果。
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Apr;5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S82-8. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2012.5.S1.S82. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
4
The vibrant soundbridge for conductive and mixed hearing losses: European multicenter study results.用于传导性和混合性听力损失的有源植入式中耳助听系统:欧洲多中心研究结果
Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;69:38-50. doi: 10.1159/000318521. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
5
Clinical Experience of Vibroplasty With Direct Coupling to the Oval Window Without Use of a Coupler.直接耦合卵圆窗的振颤治疗的临床经验,无需使用耦合器。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):E926-E932. doi: 10.1002/lary.28514. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
6
Vibrant SoundBridge application to middle ear windows versus conventional hearing aids: a comparative study based on international outcome inventory for hearing aids.基于国际助听器效果评估量表的研究:中耳窗式振动声桥应用与传统助听器的对比。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;271(1):35-40. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2387-2. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
7
Long-Term Outcomes of Vibroplasty Coupler Implantations to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss.用于治疗混合性/传导性听力损失的振动成形耦合器植入的长期疗效
Audiol Neurootol. 2018;23(6):316-325. doi: 10.1159/000495560. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
8
Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.用于慢性耳部手术后听力恢复的活力声桥
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2009;130(2):83-8.
9
The impact of the Cochlear™ Osia 2 System on patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss: A comparison with Cochlear™ Baha Attract System outcomes.Cochlear™ Osia 2 系统对混合性或传导性听力损失患者的影响:与 Cochlear™ Baha Attract 系统结果的比较。
Sci Prog. 2024 Jul-Sep;107(3):368504241280252. doi: 10.1177/00368504241280252.
10
Audiologic limitations of Vibrant Soundbridge device: Is the contralateral hearing aid fitting indispensable?活力声桥设备的听力学局限性:对侧助听器验配是否必不可少?
Laryngoscope. 2016 Sep;126(9):2116-23. doi: 10.1002/lary.25856. Epub 2016 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Age a Limiting Factor for Audiological Results in Active Middle Ear Implants?年龄是主动式中耳植入听力结果的限制因素吗?
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 26;13(12):1650. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121650.
2
Round Window Stimulation of the Cochlea.耳蜗圆窗刺激
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 14;12:777010. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.777010. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Hearing and hearing rehabilitation after obliteration of troublesome mastoid cavities.中耳乳突腔填塞后听力变化及听力康复。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Dec;277(12):3307-3313. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06041-4. Epub 2020 May 22.
2
Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures.使用患者报告的结果和听力学测量评估助听器的效果。
Audiol Neurootol. 2020;25(4):215-223. doi: 10.1159/000506666. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
3
Complications after round window vibroplasty.圆窗鼓室成形术后的并发症。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jun;276(6):1601-1605. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05402-y. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
4
Long-Term Outcomes of Vibroplasty Coupler Implantations to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss.用于治疗混合性/传导性听力损失的振动成形耦合器植入的长期疗效
Audiol Neurootol. 2018;23(6):316-325. doi: 10.1159/000495560. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
The Vibrant Soundbridge: A Global Overview.活力声桥:全球概述。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019 Apr;52(2):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
6
Long-Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant.有源中耳植入听力康复的长期效果
Laryngoscope. 2019 Feb;129(2):477-481. doi: 10.1002/lary.27513. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
7
The Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant: A historical overview.活力声桥中耳植入物:历史概述。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Nov;18(6):314-323. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1358913. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
8
Round Window Application of an Active Middle Ear Implant: A Comparison With Hearing Aid Usage in Japan.有源中耳植入物在圆窗的应用:与日本助听器使用情况的比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jul;38(6):e145-e151. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001438.
9
Long-Term Hearing Results After Ossiculoplasty.听骨成形术后的长期听力结果。
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Apr;38(4):510-515. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001339.
10
Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.主动式中耳植入物在混合性听力损失中的益处:镫骨与圆窗。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jun;127(6):1435-1441. doi: 10.1002/lary.26244. Epub 2016 Aug 25.