Woods G L, Yam P
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68105.
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 May;26(5):816-20. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.816-820.1988.
Clinical isolates of staphylococci (420 Staphylococcus aureus isolates and 248 coagulase-negative staphylococci) were tested by both MicroScan MIC panels (MicroScan, West Sacramento, Calif.) and an oxacillin agar screen (Mueller-Hinton agar [Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.] containing 6 micrograms of oxacillin per ml and 4% NaCl) to evaluate the ability of MicroScan to detect oxacillin-resistant strains. MicroScan panels and oxacillin agar screen plates were incubated at 35 degrees C for 24 h and at 30 degrees C for an additional 24 h. Endpoints were recorded at 24 and 48 h. By MicroScan, 23 (5.5%) and 30 (7%) S. aureus isolates and 161 (65%) and 162 (65%) coagulase-negative staphylococci were oxacillin resistant at 24 and 48 h, respectively. At both 24 and 48 h, 23 (5.5%) S. aureus isolates and 162 (65%) coagulase-negative staphylococci were resistant by the oxacillin agar screen. Five strains for which the oxacillin MIC was 2 or 4 micrograms/ml and eight strains resistant to oxacillin only at 48 h were further evaluated by broth macrodilution testing for oxacillin with and without clavulanic acid, by oxacillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid disk diffusion, and by oxacillin agar screen comparing Mueller-Hinton agars purchased from Difco and BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md. By this additional testing, all 10 S. aureus isolates and 1 of 3 coagulase-negative staphylococci examined produced increased amounts of beta-lactamase. One coagulase-negative staphylococcus appeared to be truly intermediately oxacillin susceptible. There was no significant difference in the rate of detection of oxacillin resistance between MicroScan and the agar screen. MicroScan panels should be incubated for 24 h only, because prolonged incubation caused strains producing excessive amounts of beta-lactamase to appear to be falsely oxacillin resistant.
采用MicroScan MIC板(MicroScan公司,加利福尼亚州西萨克拉门托)和苯唑西林琼脂筛选法(含6微克/毫升苯唑西林和4%氯化钠的穆勒-欣顿琼脂[迪夫科实验室,密歇根州底特律])对葡萄球菌临床分离株(420株金黄色葡萄球菌分离株和248株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌)进行检测,以评估MicroScan检测苯唑西林耐药菌株的能力。将MicroScan板和苯唑西林琼脂筛选平板在35℃孵育24小时,然后在30℃再孵育24小时。在24小时和48小时记录终点结果。通过MicroScan检测,在24小时和48小时时,分别有23株(5.5%)和30株(7%)金黄色葡萄球菌分离株以及161株(65%)和162株(65%)凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌对苯唑西林耐药。在24小时和48小时时,苯唑西林琼脂筛选法均检测出23株(5.5%)金黄色葡萄球菌分离株和162株(65%)凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌耐药。对苯唑西林MIC为2或4微克/毫升的5株菌株以及仅在48小时时对苯唑西林耐药的8株菌株,进一步通过含或不含克拉维酸的苯唑西林肉汤稀释试验、苯唑西林和阿莫西林-克拉维酸纸片扩散法以及比较从迪夫科和马里兰州科基斯维尔的BBL微生物系统公司购买的穆勒-欣顿琼脂的苯唑西林琼脂筛选法进行评估。通过这些额外检测,所检测的10株金黄色葡萄球菌分离株和3株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌中的1株产生的β-内酰胺酶量增加。1株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌似乎确实对苯唑西林中度敏感。MicroScan和琼脂筛选法在苯唑西林耐药检测率方面无显著差异。MicroScan板仅应孵育24小时,因为延长孵育会使产生过量β-内酰胺酶的菌株看似对苯唑西林耐药。