Suppr超能文献

用于检测菌血症和真菌血症的Oxoid信号系统与BACTEC放射测量血培养系统的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of Oxoid Signal and BACTEC radiometric blood culture systems for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

作者信息

Weinstein M P, Mirrett S, Reller L B

机构信息

Microbiology Laboratory, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1988 May;26(5):962-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.962-964.1988.

Abstract

The Oxoid Signal (Oxoid U.S.A., Inc., Columbia, Md.) blood culture system is a newly described, innovative method for visually detecting growth of microorganisms (D. Sawney, S. Hinder, D. Swaine, and E.Y. Bridson, J. Clin. Pathol. 39:1259-1263, 1986). We did 5,999 paired comparisons of equal volumes (10 ml) of blood in the Oxoid Signal and BACTEC (Johnson Laboratories, Towson, Md.) radiometric blood culture systems at two university hospitals that use identical methods of obtaining and processing specimens. Overall, more microorganisms were detected in the BACTEC system (P less than 0.001), in particular, streptococci (P less than 0.01), fungi (P less than 0.001), and nonfermentative gram-negative rods, especially Acinetobacter species (P less than 0.001). Trends favoring the BACTEC system for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus species, and Neisseria species were noted. There were no differences in the yield of staphylococci, members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, and anaerobic bacteria. When both systems detected sepsis, the BACTEC did so earlier (P less than 0.001). This advantage was most notable at 24 h (70% of BACTEC positives detected versus 48% of Oxoid positives). The proportion of positives detected after 48 h, however, was similar (BACTEC, 84%; Oxoid, 78%). Revisions in the Oxoid Signal system itself or in the processing of Oxoid bottles appear to be necessary to improve its performance in detecting certain microorganism groups, especially fungi.

摘要

奥克托德信号(Oxoid美国公司,马里兰州哥伦比亚)血培养系统是一种新描述的、用于目视检测微生物生长的创新方法(D. 索尼、S. 欣德、D. 斯温以及E.Y. 布里德森,《临床病理学杂志》39:1259 - 1263,1986年)。我们在两家采用相同标本采集和处理方法的大学医院,对奥克托德信号血培养系统和BACTEC(约翰逊实验室,马里兰州陶森)放射性血培养系统中相同体积(10毫升)的血液进行了5999次配对比较。总体而言,BACTEC系统检测到的微生物更多(P小于0.001),尤其是链球菌(P小于0.01)、真菌(P小于0.001)以及非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌,特别是不动杆菌属(P小于0.001)。注意到在检测铜绿假单胞菌、嗜血杆菌属和奈瑟菌属方面,BACTEC系统有更优趋势。葡萄球菌、肠杆菌科成员和厌氧菌的检出率没有差异。当两个系统都检测到败血症时,BACTEC系统更早检测到(P小于0.001)。这一优势在24小时时最为显著(BACTEC系统检测到70%的阳性,而奥克托德系统为48%)。然而,48小时后检测到的阳性比例相似(BACTEC系统为84%;奥克托德系统为78%)。似乎有必要对奥克托德信号系统本身或奥克托德培养瓶的处理进行改进,以提高其在检测某些微生物群体(尤其是真菌)方面的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1cc/266496/9a6ad8d4d702/jcm00077-0195-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验