• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Games of uncertainty: the participation of older patients with multimorbidity in care planning meetings - a qualitative study.不确定性的游戏:多病共存的老年患者参与护理计划会议 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 13;21(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02184-z.
2
'What matters to you?' Normative integration of an intervention to promote participation of older patients with multi-morbidity - a qualitative case study.“对你来说什么重要?”促进患有多种疾病的老年患者参与的干预措施的规范整合——一项定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 4;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06106-y.
3
Shared decision making between older people with multimorbidity and GPs: a qualitative study.老年人合并多种疾病与全科医生之间的共同决策:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jul 28;72(721):e609-e618. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0529. Print 2022 Aug.
4
Assuring patient participation and care continuity in intermediate care: Getting the most out of family meetings using the four habits model.确保中级护理中的患者参与和护理连续性:使用四习惯模型充分利用家庭会议。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2582-2592. doi: 10.1111/hex.13591. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
User participation is a family matter: A multiple case study of the experiences of older, hospitalised people and their relatives.患者参与是一个家庭事务:对老年住院患者及其亲属经历的多案例研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4353-4363. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13765. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
Total uncertainty: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of experiences of uncertainty in older people with advanced multimorbidity, their informal carers and health professionals.总不确定性:对患有晚期多种疾病的老年人、他们的非正式照顾者和卫生专业人员的不确定性体验进行的系统评价和主题综合分析。
Age Ageing. 2022 Aug 2;51(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac188.
7
Factors affecting primary care physician decision-making for patients with complex multimorbidity: a qualitative interview study.影响基层医疗医生对患有复杂多种慢性病患者决策的因素:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Feb 5;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01633-x.
8
Setting goals with patients living with multimorbidity: qualitative analysis of general practice consultations.与患有多种疾病的患者一起设定目标:全科医疗咨询的定性分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jul;69(684):e479-e488. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704129. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
9
Patient participation during primary health-care encounters among adult patients with multimorbidity: A cross-sectional study.患者参与多重慢性病成年患者初级保健就诊过程:一项横断面研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1660-1676. doi: 10.1111/hex.13306. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
10
Assessment of functioning in Dutch primary care: Development study of a consultation tool for patients with chronic conditions and multimorbidity.荷兰初级保健中功能评估:为患有慢性病和多种疾病的患者开发一种咨询工具的发展研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1363-1373. doi: 10.1111/hex.13474. Epub 2022 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Aging With Grace: The Quest for Integrated, Compassionate Care for Older Adults.优雅老去:寻求为老年人提供综合、关怀备至的护理
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Aug 16;10:23779608241274209. doi: 10.1177/23779608241274209. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Active listening, shared decision-making and participation in care among older women and primary care nurses: a critical discourse analysis approach from a gender perspective.老年女性与初级护理护士之间的积极倾听、共同决策及参与护理:基于性别视角的批判性话语分析方法
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 17;23(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02086-6.
3
Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities.重大疾病中的不确定性:一项全国性跨学科共识实践,旨在确定临床研究重点。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0289522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289522. eCollection 2024.
4
Older Adults' Experiences With Participation and eHealth in Care Coordination: Qualitative Interview Study in a Primary Care Setting.老年人在医疗协调中参与和使用电子健康的经历:基层医疗环境中的定性访谈研究
J Particip Med. 2023 Oct 2;15:e47550. doi: 10.2196/47550.
5
Analysing Power Relations among Older Norwegian Patients and Spanish Migrant Nurses in Home Nursing Care: A Critical Discourse Analysis Approach from a Transcultural Perspective.从跨文化视角分析挪威老年患者与西班牙移民护士在家庭护理中的权力关系:一种批判性话语分析方法
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 29;11(9):1282. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091282.
6
Total uncertainty: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of experiences of uncertainty in older people with advanced multimorbidity, their informal carers and health professionals.总不确定性:对患有晚期多种疾病的老年人、他们的非正式照顾者和卫生专业人员的不确定性体验进行的系统评价和主题综合分析。
Age Ageing. 2022 Aug 2;51(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac188.
7
Person- and family-centred goal-setting for older adults in Canadian home care: A solution-focused approach.加拿大家庭护理中以老年人及其家庭为中心的目标设定:一种以解决问题为重点的方法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e2445-e2456. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13685. Epub 2021 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Goal-Oriented Care: A Catalyst for Person-Centred System Integration.以目标为导向的护理:以患者为中心的系统整合的催化剂。
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Nov 4;20(4):8. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5520.
2
Supporting Older People to Live Safely at Home - Findings from Thirteen Case Studies on Integrated Care Across Europe.支持老年人在家安全生活——欧洲综合护理十三项案例研究的结果
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Oct 7;20(4):1. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5423.
3
The stability of care preferences following acute illness: a mixed methods prospective cohort study of frail older people.急性病后护理偏好的稳定性:一项针对体弱老年人的前瞻性混合方法队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01725-2.
4
Addressing safety risks in integrated care programs for older people living at home: a scoping review.解决居家老年人综合护理计划中的安全风险:范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Feb 28;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1482-7.
5
Interventions for involving older patients with multi-morbidity in decision-making during primary care consultations.在初级保健会诊期间让患有多种疾病的老年患者参与决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 28;2019(10):CD013124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013124.pub2.
6
Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis.支持有多种健康和社会护理需求的老年人共同决策:一个现实主义的综合研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jul 18;18(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0853-9.
7
A person-centered integrated care quality framework, based on a qualitative study of patients' evaluation of care in light of chronic care ideals.一个以患者为中心的综合护理质量框架,该框架基于一项定性研究,该研究根据慢性病护理理想对患者的护理评价进行了分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 20;18(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3246-z.
8
A Concept Analysis of Patient Participation in Intermediate Care.患者参与中级护理的概念分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1337-1350. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
9
Disentangling self-management goal setting and action planning: A scoping review.解析自我管理目标设定与行动计划:一项范围综述
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188822. eCollection 2017.
10
Multimorbidity and Decision-Making Preferences Among Older Adults.老年人的多种并存疾病与决策偏好。
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Nov;15(6):546-551. doi: 10.1370/afm.2106.

不确定性的游戏:多病共存的老年患者参与护理计划会议 - 一项定性研究。

Games of uncertainty: the participation of older patients with multimorbidity in care planning meetings - a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department for Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Institutt for helsevitenskap, NTNU i Ålesund, Ålesund, Norway.

Department of Public Health and Nursing, Trondheim, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Institutt for samfunnsmedisin og sykepleie, NTNU, Øya Helsehus, Mauritz Hansens gate 2, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 13;21(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02184-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-021-02184-z
PMID:33849484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8045290/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Active patients lie at the heart of integrated care. Although interventions to increase the participation of older patients in care planning are being implemented in several countries, there is a lack of knowledge about the interactions involved and how they are experienced by older patients with multimorbidity. We explore this issue in the context of care-planning meetings within Norwegian municipal health services.

METHODS

This qualitative study drew on direct observations of ten care-planning meetings and an interview with each patient right after the meeting. Following a stepwise-deductive induction approach, the analysis began inductively and then considered the interactions through the lens of game theory.

RESULTS

The care-planning interactions were influenced by uncertainty about the course of the disease and how to plan service delivery. In terms derived from game theory, the imaginary and unpredictable player 'Nature' generated uncertainty in the 'game' of care planning. The 'players' assessed this uncertainty differently, leading to three patterns of game. 1) In the 'game of chance', patients viewed future events as random and uncontrollable; they felt outmatched by the opponent Nature and became passive in their decision-making. 2) In the 'competitive game', participants positioned themselves on two opposing sides, one side perceiving Nature as a significant threat and the other assigning it little importance. The two sides negotiated about how to accommodate uncertainty, and the level of patient participation varied. 3) In the 'coordination game', all participants were aligned, either in viewing themselves as teammates against Nature or in ascribing little importance to it. The level of patient participation was high.

CONCLUSIONS

In care planning meetings, the level of patient participation may partly be associated with how the various actors appraise and respond to uncertainty. Dialogue on uncertainty in care-planning interventions could help to increase patient participation.

摘要

背景

积极参与的患者是整合照护的核心。尽管一些国家正在实施干预措施,以提高老年患者参与照护计划的程度,但对于涉及的相互作用以及患有多种疾病的老年患者的体验,我们知之甚少。我们在挪威市立卫生服务机构的照护计划会议背景下探讨了这一问题。

方法

本定性研究基于对十次照护计划会议的直接观察以及会后对每位患者的访谈。采用逐步演绎归纳方法,分析首先是从归纳开始,然后从博弈论的角度考虑相互作用。

结果

照护计划的相互作用受到对疾病进程和服务提供计划的不确定性的影响。根据博弈论衍生的术语,想象中的、不可预测的“自然”玩家在照护计划的“游戏”中产生了不确定性。“玩家”对这种不确定性有不同的评估,导致了三种游戏模式。1)在“机会游戏”中,患者认为未来的事件是随机且不可控的;他们觉得自己在对手“自然”面前处于劣势,在决策过程中变得被动。2)在“竞争游戏”中,参与者站在两个对立的立场上,一方认为“自然”是一个重大威胁,另一方则认为它不重要。双方就如何应对不确定性进行协商,患者的参与程度各不相同。3)在“协调游戏”中,所有参与者都站在同一立场,要么将自己视为对抗“自然”的队友,要么认为它不重要。患者的参与程度很高。

结论

在照护计划会议中,患者的参与程度可能部分与各参与者如何评估和应对不确定性有关。在照护计划干预中讨论不确定性,可能有助于提高患者的参与程度。