• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

30 年来弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤随机对照试验入选标准的演变。

Evolution of eligibility criteria for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma randomised controlled trials over 30 years.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Haematology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Research and Wellness Centre at Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.

Department of Haematology, Monash Health, Clayton, Vic., Australia.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2021 May;193(4):741-749. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17436. Epub 2021 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1111/bjh.17436
PMID:33851428
Abstract

Eligibility criteria for randomised control trials (RCT) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) may be becoming increasingly strict. In this analysis, 42 first-line phase III RCTs enrolling DLBCL patients since 1990 were identified from PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov. Changes in 31 individual eligibility criteria were assessed using three pre-defined eras [(1) 1993-2005; (2) 2006-2013; and (3) 2014-2020]. The presence of 15/31 criteria increased significantly over time, and the total number of criteria per study also increased over time [median Era 1: 14·5, interquartile range (IQR) 12·6-16·4; Era 2: 21, 18·8-23·3; Era 3: 23, 21-25; P < 0·001]. When each trial's eligibility criteria were applied to 215 consecutive patients from an institutional database treated between 2010 and 2020, a median of 57% (IQR 47-70) of patients were hypothetically eligible for trial enrolment. The median percentage of patients eligible was 68% (56-91), 54% (37-81) and 47% (38-82) for Era 1, 2 and 3 respectively (P = 0·004). Phase III front-line DLBCL trial criteria have become increasingly restrictive over the last three decades, resulting in a diminishing proportion of trial-eligible patients, with less than 50% of our patients eligible for modern-era studies. This potentially impacts generalisability of recent trial results and will likely limit recruitment to ongoing studies.

摘要

弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 (DLBCL) 随机对照试验 (RCT) 的入选标准可能越来越严格。在这项分析中,从 PubMed 和 clinicaltrials.gov 中确定了自 1990 年以来纳入 DLBCL 患者的 42 项一线 III 期 RCT。使用三个预先定义的时期 [(1) 1993-2005 年;(2) 2006-2013 年;和 (3) 2014-2020 年] 评估了 31 项入选标准的变化。随着时间的推移,15/31 项标准的存在显著增加,并且每项研究的标准数量也随时间增加[中位数时期 1:14.5,四分位距 (IQR) 12.6-16.4;时期 2:21,18.8-23.3;时期 3:23,21-25;P < 0.001]。当将每个试验的入选标准应用于 2010 年至 2020 年间治疗的机构数据库中的 215 名连续患者时,理论上有 57%(IQR 47-70)的患者符合试验入组标准。符合入选标准的患者的中位数百分比分别为时期 1、2 和 3 的 68%(56-91)、54%(37-81)和 47%(38-82)(P = 0.004)。在过去的三十年中,III 期一线 DLBCL 试验的标准变得越来越严格,导致试验合格患者的比例下降,不到 50%的患者有资格参加现代研究。这可能会影响最近试验结果的普遍性,并可能限制对正在进行的研究的招募。

相似文献

1
Evolution of eligibility criteria for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma randomised controlled trials over 30 years.30 年来弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤随机对照试验入选标准的演变。
Br J Haematol. 2021 May;193(4):741-749. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17436. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
Evaluating the impact of laboratory-based eligibility criteria by race/ethnicity in first-line clinical trials of DLBCL.评估基于实验室的种族/民族入选标准在弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤一线临床试验中的影响。
Blood Adv. 2024 Aug 27;8(16):4414-4422. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024012838.
3
Eligibility criteria in randomized phase II and III adjuvant and neoadjuvant breast cancer trials: not a significant barrier to enrollment.随机 II 期和 III 期辅助和新辅助乳腺癌试验的纳入标准:不是入组的显著障碍。
Clin Trials. 2012 Oct;9(5):652-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774512456453.
4
Lenalidomide maintenance in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation: an open label, single-arm, multicentre phase 2 trial.来那度胺维持治疗不适用于自体干细胞移植的复发弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者:一项开放标签、单臂、多中心2期试验。
Lancet Haematol. 2017 Mar;4(3):e137-e146. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30016-9. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
5
Clinical efficacy and safety in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic literature review.复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的临床疗效与安全性:一项系统文献综述
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2014 Oct;14(5):343-355.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
6
Assessing the Eligibility Criteria in Phase III Randomized Controlled Trials of Drug Therapy in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The Critical Play-Off Between a "Pure" Patient Phenotype and the Generalizability of Trial Findings.评估射血分数保留的心力衰竭药物治疗 III 期随机对照试验的纳入标准:“纯”患者表型与试验结果普遍性之间的关键博弈。
J Card Fail. 2017 Jul;23(7):517-524. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
7
Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. A multicenter retrospective analysis of eligibility criteria for car-T cell therapy.复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者。嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗资格标准的多中心回顾性分析。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2021 Apr;62(4):828-836. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1849676. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
8
Do screening trial recruitment logs accurately reflect the eligibility criteria of a given clinical trial? Early lessons from the RAVES 0803 trial.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014 Jun;26(6):348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
9
Changes in treatment patterns and impact of radiotherapy for early stage diffuse large B cell lymphoma after Rituximab: A population-based analysis.利妥昔单抗治疗后早期弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤治疗模式的变化及放疗的影响:一项基于人群的分析。
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jul;120(1):150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.027. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
10
Outcomes in refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from the international SCHOLAR-1 study.难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的预后:国际SCHOLAR-1研究结果
Blood. 2017 Oct 19;130(16):1800-1808. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-769620. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of sociodemographic determinants on enrollment into contemporary lymphoma clinical trials: a systematic review.社会人口学决定因素对当代淋巴瘤临床试验入组情况的影响:一项系统综述
Oncologist. 2025 Jun 4;30(6). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf180.
2
A Real-World Data-Based Analysis of Prognostic Indices as Part of Trial Eligibility Criteria in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients.基于真实世界数据对弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者作为试验纳入标准一部分的预后指标进行分析。
Eur J Haematol. 2025 Jan;114(1):26-36. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14301. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
3
Evaluating the impact of laboratory-based eligibility criteria by race/ethnicity in first-line clinical trials of DLBCL.
评估基于实验室的种族/民族入选标准在弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤一线临床试验中的影响。
Blood Adv. 2024 Aug 27;8(16):4414-4422. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024012838.
4
Evaluation of participation and recruitment bias in a prospective Real World Data in Lymphoma and Survival in Adults (REALYSA) cohort for newly diagnosed lymphoma patients over 1 year in a hematology department of teaching hospital.在一家教学医院血液科对新诊断的淋巴瘤患者进行为期1年的前瞻性淋巴瘤真实世界数据与成人存活率(REALYSA)队列研究中,对参与和招募偏倚的评估。
Hematol Oncol. 2024 Jul;42(4):e3297. doi: 10.1002/hon.3297.
5
Poor outcomes for trial-ineligible patients receiving polatuzumab for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in routine care: An Australian Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry project.在常规治疗中,接受泊洛妥珠单抗治疗的复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤试验不合格患者的不良预后:一项澳大利亚淋巴瘤及相关疾病登记项目。
EJHaem. 2024 Feb 23;5(2):325-332. doi: 10.1002/jha2.870. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Quantitative evaluation of the impact of relaxing eligibility criteria on the risk-benefit profile of drugs for lung cancer based on real-world data.基于真实世界数据定量评估放宽肺癌药物资格标准对其风险效益比的影响。
Thorac Cancer. 2024 May;15(14):1187-1194. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15269. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
7
Challenges identifying DLBCL patients with poor outcomes to upfront chemoimmunotherapy and its impact on frontline clinical trials.识别 upfront chemoimmunotherapy 治疗预后不良的 DLBCL 患者的挑战及其对一线临床试验的影响。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2024 Apr;65(4):430-439. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2023.2298705. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
8
Challenges for quality and utilization of real-world data for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in REALYSA, a LYSA cohort.REALYSA 中弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤真实世界数据的质量和利用面临的挑战,这是一个 LYSA 队列。
Blood Adv. 2024 Jan 23;8(2):296-308. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010798.
9
Improving eligibility criteria for first-line trials for patients with DLBCL using a US-based Delphi-method survey.采用美国德尔菲法调查,改善弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者一线试验的入选标准。
Blood Adv. 2022 May 10;6(9):2745-2756. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006504.