Suppr超能文献

采用美国德尔菲法调查,改善弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者一线试验的入选标准。

Improving eligibility criteria for first-line trials for patients with DLBCL using a US-based Delphi-method survey.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Department of Quantitative Theory and Methods, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Blood Adv. 2022 May 10;6(9):2745-2756. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006504.

Abstract

Recent first-line randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have shown negative results, which may be due in part to onerous eligibility criteria limiting enrollment of poor-risk patients who require immediate treatment. We conducted a Delphi-method survey with lymphoma experts in the United States to define recommendations for essential and potentially unnecessary enrollment criteria for modern first-line DLBCL RCTs aimed at increasing clinical diversity of ensuing study groups. We first tabulated enrollment criteria from 19 DLBCL RCTs spanning the rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) era to identify common eligibility criteria from prior DLBCL RCTs for inclusion in the Delphi-method survey. We tabulated 451 total eligibility criteria comprising 51 criterion categories across 19 first-line DLBCL RCTs in the R-CHOP era. We then surveyed lymphoma clinical trial experts representing 8 academic medical centers in the United States regarding essential and unnecessary eligibility criteria for modern DLBCL RCTs. Seventeen of 29 invited clinical investigators completed the round-1 questionnaire (response rate, of 58.6%), 15 of 17 round-1 participants (88.2%) completed the round-2 survey, and all round-1 participants reviewed finalized recommendations for eligibility criteria for modern first-line DLBCL RCTs. We defined consensus recommendations for 31 modernized eligibility criteria including threshold values for 10 quantitative eligibility criteria aimed at facilitating enrollment of a clinically diverse study population in first-line DLBCL RCTs designed to improve standard-of-care therapy.

摘要

最近针对弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 (DLBCL) 患者的一线随机对照试验 (RCT) 结果均为阴性,部分原因可能是严格的入选标准限制了需要立即治疗的高危患者入组。我们采用美国淋巴瘤专家德尔菲法调查,旨在增加后续研究组的临床多样性,为现代一线 DLBCL RCT 的必要和潜在不必要入选标准定义推荐意见。我们首先从利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)时代的 19 项 DLBCL RCT 中列出入选标准,以确定之前的 DLBCL RCT 中常见的纳入德尔菲法调查的入选标准。我们共列出 451 项入选标准,涵盖 R-CHOP 时代 19 项一线 DLBCL RCT 中的 51 个标准类别。然后,我们对代表美国 8 家学术医疗中心的淋巴瘤临床试验专家就现代 DLBCL RCT 的必要和不必要入选标准进行调查。在 29 位受邀临床研究人员中,有 17 位(58.6%)完成了第一轮问卷,17 位中的 15 位(88.2%)完成了第二轮调查,所有第一轮参与者都审查了现代一线 DLBCL RCT 入选标准的最终推荐意见。我们定义了 31 项现代化入选标准的共识推荐意见,包括 10 项定量入选标准的阈值,旨在促进在旨在改善标准治疗的一线 DLBCL RCT 中纳入具有临床多样性的研究人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/720a/9092417/051e7513455e/advancesADV2021006504absf1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验