• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血压研究中的观察者偏倚。

Observer bias in blood pressure studies.

作者信息

Bruce N G, Shaper A G, Walker M, Wannamethee G

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and General Practice, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 1988 May;6(5):375-80.

PMID:3385202
Abstract

Observer variation in blood pressure measurement following training with standard techniques has been investigated in a study of 7735 middle-aged men. The initial training produced consistent results between observers, but there were progressive deteriorations in the ensuing months. Subsequent re-training led to marked though inconsistent reductions in variation, but within 1 or 2 months, observers reverted back to an individual level of bias. The magnitude of observer variation is in line with the few other published accounts, and is sufficient to have important implications for group comparisons, clinical trials, and the clinical care of individual patients. Four methods of reducing observer variation are considered: regular re-training, self-measurement and ambulatory monitoring, automatic sphygmomanometers, and adjustment in the analysis. The adjustment procedure used in the British Regional Heart Study is described. Regular and frequent re-training with monitoring of performance, or the use of automatic machines are presently considered the two most practical methods of reducing observer variation.

摘要

在一项针对7735名中年男性的研究中,对采用标准技术培训后血压测量中的观察者变异进行了调查。初始培训使观察者之间的结果保持一致,但在随后的几个月里出现了逐渐恶化的情况。随后的再培训导致变异明显减少,尽管并不一致,但在1到2个月内,观察者又恢复到了各自的偏差水平。观察者变异的程度与其他少数已发表的报告一致,足以对组间比较、临床试验以及个体患者的临床护理产生重要影响。文中考虑了四种减少观察者变异的方法:定期再培训、自我测量和动态监测、自动血压计以及分析中的调整。描述了英国地区心脏研究中使用的调整程序。目前认为,定期且频繁地进行再培训并监测表现,或使用自动仪器是减少观察者变异的两种最实用的方法。

相似文献

1
Observer bias in blood pressure studies.血压研究中的观察者偏倚。
J Hypertens. 1988 May;6(5):375-80.
2
The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.经过训练的观察者比自动(欧姆龙)设备能更好地预测高血压患者的日间动态血压舒张压。
Blood Press Monit. 2006 Apr;11(2):53-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000200480.26669.72.
3
[Validation of electronic automatic-measurement arterial blood pressure devices].[电子自动测量动脉血压装置的验证]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2000 Aug;93(8):979-82.
4
Blood pressure reactivity and bias vary with age in a comparison of traditional and automated methods of measurement.在传统测量方法与自动测量方法的比较中,血压反应性和偏差随年龄而变化。
Med Instrum. 1988 Oct;22(5):230-3.
5
End-digit preference in general practice: a comparison of the conventional auscultatory and electronic oscillometric methods.全科医疗中的末位数字偏好:传统听诊法与电子示波法的比较
Blood Press. 2008;17(2):104-9. doi: 10.1080/08037050801972881.
6
Validation of the A&D UA-705 device for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.根据英国高血压学会协议对A&D UA - 705型血压自测设备进行验证。
Blood Press Monit. 2006 Aug;11(4):223-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000209072.92589.ea.
7
[Blood pressure determination and medical competence].[血压测定与医疗能力]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1997 Aug;90(8):1087-92.
8
Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.根据国际协议对Microlife WatchBP Home设备进行家庭自测血压的验证。
Blood Press Monit. 2007 Jun;12(3):185-8. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3280b083ce.
9
Development of diagnostic thresholds for automated self-measurement of blood pressure in adults. First International Consensus Conference on Blood Pressure Self-Measurement.成人血压自动自我测量诊断阈值的制定。首届血压自我测量国际共识会议。
Blood Press Monit. 2000 Apr;5(2):101-9.
10
Observer error in blood pressure measurement.血压测量中的观察者误差。
CMAJ. 1986 Sep 15;135(6):633-7.

引用本文的文献

1
International Consensus on Standardized Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement - A Call to Action.《标准化诊室血压测量国际共识——行动呼吁》
Am J Med. 2023 May;136(5):438-445.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.12.015. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
2
The reliability of patient blood pressure self-assessments - a cross-sectional study.患者血压自我评估的可靠性 - 一项横断面研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 3;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01962-x.
3
Association of an Automated Blood Pressure Measurement Quality Improvement Program With Terminal Digit Preference and Recorded Mean Blood Pressure in 11 Clinics.
自动血压测量质量改进计划与 11 家诊所的末位数字偏好和记录的平均血压的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2229098. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29098.
4
Drivers and scorecards to improve hypertension control in primary care practice: Recommendations from the HEARTS in the Americas Innovation Group.改善初级保健实践中高血压控制的驱动因素和记分卡:美洲HEARTS创新小组的建议
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 May;9:None. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100223.
5
[Drivers and scorecards to improve hypertension control in primary care practice: Recommendations from the HEARTS in the Americas Innovation GroupFatores impulsionadores e scorecards para melhorar o controle da hipertensão arterial na atenção primária: recomendações do Grupo de Inovação da Iniciativa HEARTS nas Américas].[改善初级保健实践中高血压控制的驱动因素和记分卡:美洲HEARTS创新小组的建议 改善初级保健中动脉高血压控制的驱动因素和记分卡:美洲HEARTS倡议创新小组的建议]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 May 10;46:e56. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.56. eCollection 2022.
6
[Drivers and scorecards to improve hypertension control in primary care practice: Recommendations from the HEARTS in the Americas Innovation GroupFactores impulsores y métodos de puntuación para mejorar el control de la hipertensión en la práctica clínica de la atención primaria: recomendaciones del grupo de innovación de HEARTS en las Américas].[改善初级保健实践中高血压控制的驱动因素和记分卡:美洲HEARTS创新小组的建议 初级保健实践中改善高血压控制的驱动因素和记分方法:美洲HEARTS创新小组的建议]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 May 10;46:e68. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.68. eCollection 2022.
7
[Optimizing observer performance of clinic blood Pressure measurement: a position statement from the Lancet Commission on Hypertension GroupOtimização do desempenho do observador na medição clínica da pressão arterial: posicionamento do Grupo da ].[优化临床血压测量的观察者表现:《柳叶刀》高血压委员会小组的立场声明 优化临床血压测量中观察者的表现:该小组的立场声明] (原文中存在部分重复和不完整表述,翻译尽量忠实原文)
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020 Jul 15;44:e88. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2020.88. eCollection 2020.
8
Optimizing observer performance of clinic blood pressure measurement: a position statement from the Lancet Commission on Hypertension Group.优化临床血压测量中观察者的表现:柳叶刀高血压委员会的立场声明。
J Hypertens. 2019 Sep;37(9):1737-1745. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002112.
9
The IDEMCare Study-Improving Dementia Care in Black African and Caribbean Groups: A feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial.IDEMCare 研究——改善黑非洲和加勒比族群的痴呆症护理:一项可行性聚类随机对照试验。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;33(8):1048-1056. doi: 10.1002/gps.4891. Epub 2018 May 9.
10
Promoting sustainability in quality improvement: an evaluation of a web-based continuing education program in blood pressure measurement.促进质量改进中的可持续性:一项基于网络的血压测量继续教育项目评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 10;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0682-5.