• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 DEA 的 Malmquist 生产率指数在东盟国家医疗保健系统效率中的应用。

Application of DEA-Based Malmquist Productivity Index on Health Care System Efficiency of ASEAN Countries.

机构信息

Department of Commerce, School of Entrepreneurship and Management Studies, SRM University-AP, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Department of Economics, SRM University-AP, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jul;36(4):1236-1250. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3169. Epub 2021 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.3169
PMID:33855765
Abstract

This study assesses and compares the productive efficiency of the national healthcare system of the ASEAN region which includes Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam amidst rising mortality rate from noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) era. Nonparametric data envelopment analysis technique based on the Malmquist Productivity Index is performed and its components, total factor productivity change, technical change and technological change are compared across the region. Two different models are considered in assessing and comparing the technical efficiency of the national healthcare system across the region with life expectancy at birth and mortality rate from NCDs as parallel health care output for both the models. The mean value of total factor productivity is 0.983 and 0.974 which suggests that national healthcare system productivity efficiency decays by 1.7% for Model I and 2.6% for Model II, respectively. This suggests that the health care system inefficiencies across the ASEAN region have not made life expectancy to improve as much as it should be and curtailed the mortality rate from growing chronic NCDs within a decade. The region is likely to lag behind in achieving SDGs 3 target 4 on reducing by one-third premature mortality from chronic NCDs unless the health care system's technical efficiency is improved across the region. The finding suggests a microlevel study on each country to identify major sources of healthcare system inefficiency in a bid to ameliorate it.

摘要

本研究评估并比较了东盟地区(包括文莱、柬埔寨、印度尼西亚、老挝、马来西亚、缅甸、菲律宾、新加坡、泰国和越南)的医疗保健系统的生产效率,因为在可持续发展目标(SDGs)时代,非传染性疾病(NCDs)的死亡率不断上升。本研究采用基于 Malmquist 生产力指数的非参数数据包络分析技术,并比较了该地区的总要素生产率变化、技术变化和技术进步等各个组成部分。在评估和比较该地区各国医疗保健系统的技术效率时,本研究考虑了两种不同的模型,将出生时预期寿命和 NCD 死亡率作为两种模型的平行医疗保健产出。总要素生产率的平均值为 0.983 和 0.974,这表明模型 I 中的国家医疗保健系统生产力效率下降了 1.7%,模型 II 中的效率下降了 2.6%。这表明,东盟地区的医疗保健系统效率低下,导致出生时预期寿命的提高幅度不如预期,在十年内遏制了不断增长的慢性 NCD 的死亡率。除非该地区提高医疗保健系统的技术效率,否则该地区可能难以实现 SDGs 关于将慢性 NCD 导致的过早死亡率减少三分之一的目标 4。该研究结果表明,需要对每个国家进行微观层面的研究,以确定医疗保健系统效率低下的主要原因,并努力加以改善。

相似文献

1
Application of DEA-Based Malmquist Productivity Index on Health Care System Efficiency of ASEAN Countries.基于 DEA 的 Malmquist 生产率指数在东盟国家医疗保健系统效率中的应用。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jul;36(4):1236-1250. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3169. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
Asymmetric Effect of Business Cycles on Population Health: Evidence From the ASEAN Countries.经济周期对人口健康的非对称影响:来自东盟国家的证据。
Front Public Health. 2020 Feb 21;8:32. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00032. eCollection 2020.
3
The epidemiology of COVID-19 in ten Southeast Asian countries.COVID-19 在十个东南亚国家的流行病学情况。
Med J Malaysia. 2021 Nov;76(6):783-791.
4
Productivity change of national health systems in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region: application of DEA-based Malmquist productivity index.世界卫生组织东地中海区域各国卫生系统的生产率变化:基于数据包络分析的Malmquist生产率指数的应用
Glob Health Res Policy. 2018 Aug 1;3:22. doi: 10.1186/s41256-018-0077-8. eCollection 2018.
5
Inequity of maternal-child health services in ASEAN member states from 1993 to 2021.1993 年至 2021 年东盟成员国母婴健康服务的不平等现象。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Aug 7;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01974-8.
6
A landscape analysis of health technology assessment capacity in the Association of South-East Asian Nations region.东南亚国家联盟地区卫生技术评估能力的态势分析
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Feb 11;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00647-0.
7
Social policy and population growth in South-East Asia.东南亚的社会政策与人口增长
Int Labour Rev. 1974 May-Jun;109(5-6):459-70.
8
Performance evaluation of national healthcare systems in the prevention and treatment of non-communicable diseases in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲国家医疗卫生系统在防治非传染性疾病方面的绩效评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294653. eCollection 2023.
9
Underutilization of epilepsy surgery in ASEAN countries.东南亚国家癫痫手术未得到充分利用。
Seizure. 2019 Jul;69:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
Comparative Studies on Patient Safety Culture to Strengthen Health Systems Among Southeast Asian Countries.比较研究患者安全文化,以加强东南亚国家的卫生系统。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 12;8:600216. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.600216. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the operational efficiency of the compact urban medical group in Qiqihar based on the three-stage DEA and Malmquist index model.基于三阶段DEA和Malmquist指数模型评估齐齐哈尔市紧密型城市医疗集团的运营效率
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 18;13:1636769. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1636769. eCollection 2025.
2
Three decades in healthcare service efficiency evaluation: a bootstrapping Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) of Ministry of Health Malaysia.医疗卫生服务效率评估三十年:马来西亚卫生部的自抽样数据包络分析(DEA)
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Apr 11;15(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00624-9.
3
Efficiency evaluation, regional technological heterogeneity and determinant of total factor productivity change in China's healthcare system.
中国医疗卫生系统的效率评估、区域技术异质性与全要素生产率变化的决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 23;14(1):19606. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70736-5.
4
Health systems efficiency in China and ASEAN, 2015-2020: a DEA-Tobit and SFA analysis application.中国和东盟卫生系统效率,2015-2020:基于 DEA-Tobit 和 SFA 的分析应用。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 6;13(9):e075030. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075030.
5
Measuring Productivity and Relative Efficiency of Public Tertiary Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals in Hubei, China.测量中国湖北省公立三级中医医院的生产力和相对效率。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231190576. doi: 10.1177/00469580231190576.
6
Efficiency and Productivity Differences in Healthcare Systems: The Case of the European Union.医疗体系的效率和生产力差异:以欧盟为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):178. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010178.
7
Analysing the Efficiency of Health Systems: A Systematic Review of the Literature.分析卫生系统的效率:文献系统综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Mar;21(2):205-224. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00785-2. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
8
Stochastic frontier approach to efficiency analysis of health facilities in providing services for non-communicable diseases in eight LMICs.利用随机前沿方法分析八个中低收入国家医疗机构提供非传染性疾病服务的效率。
Int Health. 2023 Sep 1;15(5):512-525. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihac080.
9
Efficiency measurement and spatial spillover effect of provincial health systems in China: Based on the two-stage network DEA model.中国省级卫生系统的效率衡量与空间溢出效应:基于两阶段网络 DEA 模型。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 3;10:952975. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.952975. eCollection 2022.
10
The impact of human resources for health on the health outcomes of Chinese people.卫生人力资源对中国人健康结果的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 29;22(1):1213. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08540-y.