Laboratory Services & Applied Science Division, Environmental Characterization Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2021 Sep;71(9):1114-1126. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2021.1917463. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
Fuel sulfur emissions control areas have been established in a few marine coastal regions to reduce environmental impacts from combustion of high sulfur residual fuel oil (RFO). For example, in August of 2012, the U.S. began enforcing fuel sulfur limits on certain large commercial marine vessels up to 200 nautical miles (nm) of its coasts as part of a North American Emissions Control Area (NA-ECA), and in January of 2014, the U.S. began enforcing fuel sulfur limits on these vessels within up to 50 nm of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands as part of the U.S. Caribbean Sea ECA (USCAR-ECA). This work evaluates ECA effectiveness at reducing PM from combustion of RFO by using both spatial analysis, comparing PM source apportionment at IMPROVE monitoring sites largely impacted by air from either inside or outside of an ECA, along with temporal analysis, comparing RFO combustion impacts pre and post ECA enforcement at sites largely impacted by air from inside an ECA. Source apportionment was performed using Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) on chemically speciated PM data from 2009 to 2018. Results for 7 coastal U.S. IMPROVE sites influenced by marine air masses within the NA-ECA showed an annual mean reduction of PM from RFO combustion of 79.0% (range, 60.2% to 91.5%) when comparing impacts from the pre-ECA (RFO average 2.7% S) period of 2009-2011 to the ECA 0.1% fuel S period of 2015-2018. In contrast, the Virgin Islands, Big Bend, and Baengnyeong Island South Korea IMPROVE sites were impacted by RFO combustion and were largely or wholly influenced by air masses from outside of an emissions control area. These sites saw a statistically significant 14.0% increase, a 21.0% decrease, or no statistically significant change, respectively, when comparing time periods pre and post ECA enforcement.: This study performs source apportionment on PM monitoring data to identify 10 sites impacted by residual fuel oil combustion, mainly from marine vessel fuel use. The paper then evaluates the effects of enforcement of marine vessel fuel sulfur emissions control areas at reducing ambient impacts of this source on PM. This study uses both temporal analysis of the source apportionment results, comparing source impacts before and after enforcement of marine vessel fuel sulfur emissions control areas, and spatial analysis, comparing source impacts between sites largely impacted or not impacted by airmasses originating inside of marine vessel fuel sulfur emissions control areas.
设立燃油硫排放控制区是为了减少沿海地区燃烧高硫重质燃料油(RFO)对环境的影响。例如,2012 年 8 月,美国开始在其沿海 200 海里(nm)范围内对某些大型商业海船实施燃料硫限制,作为北美排放控制区(NA-ECA)的一部分,2014 年 1 月,美国开始对波多黎各和美属维尔京群岛 50nm 范围内的这些船只实施燃料硫限制,作为美国加勒比海排放控制区(USCAR-ECA)的一部分。本工作通过空间分析和时间分析,评估了排放控制区在减少 RFO 燃烧产生的 PM 方面的有效性。空间分析比较了在排放控制区内外空气影响下,改进型监测站点的 PM 源分配情况,时间分析比较了在排放控制区实施前后,在受排放控制区内部空气影响较大的站点,RFO 燃烧的影响。源分配是使用化学专化 PM 数据的正矩阵因子化(PMF)进行的,数据来自 2009 年至 2018 年。7 个受美国沿海海洋空气团影响的美国改进型监测站点结果表明,在比较 2009-2011 年预排放控制区(RFO 平均含硫量 2.7%)和 2015-2018 年排放控制区 0.1%燃料 S 期间的影响时,来自 RFO 燃烧的 PM 年平均减少 79.0%(范围为 60.2%至 91.5%)。相比之下,维尔京群岛、大弯和韩国的 Baengnyeong 岛改进型监测站点受到 RFO 燃烧的影响,主要受到来自排放控制区外的空气团的影响。这些站点分别出现了统计学上显著的 14.0%的增长、21.0%的减少或没有统计学上显著的变化,这是在比较排放控制区实施前后的时间段时观察到的。本研究对 PM 监测数据进行源分配,以确定 10 个受残余燃料油燃烧影响的站点,主要来自船舶燃料的使用。然后,本文评估了实施船舶燃料硫排放控制区对减少这一来源对 PM 的环境影响的效果。本研究同时使用时间分析源分配结果,比较船舶燃料硫排放控制区实施前后的源影响,以及空间分析,比较主要受船舶燃料硫排放控制区内部空气团影响或不受其影响的站点的源影响。