Suppr超能文献

性别和种族/民族差异对活体肾脏捐献者的人口统计学影响:是偏好还是差距?

Gender and race/ethnicity differences in living kidney donor demographics: Preference or disparity?

机构信息

Carolyn and Matthew Bucksbaum Professor of Clinical Ethics, Professor of Pediatrics, Medicine, Surgery and the College, Associate Director of the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, Co-Director of the Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Chicago, United States of America.

Professor Emeritus of Surgery, Section on Transplantation Surgery, Faculty Emeritus of the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, United States of America.

出版信息

Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2021 Jul;35(3):100614. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100614. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

Abstract

In the United States, women are over-represented and Blacks are under-represented as living kidney donors. A traditional bioethics approach would state that as long as living donors believe that the benefits of participation outweigh the risks and harms (beneficence) and they give a voluntary and informed consent, then the demographics reflect a mere difference in preferences. Such an analysis, however, ignores the social, economic and cultural determinants as well as various forms of structural discrimination (e.g., racism, sexism) that may imply that the distribution is less voluntary than may appear initially. The distribution also raises justice concerns regarding the fair recruitment and selection of living donors. We examine the differences in living kidney donor demographics using a vulnerabilities analysis and argue that these gender and racial differences may not reflect mere preferences, but rather, serious justice concerns that need to be addressed at both the individual and systems level.

摘要

在美国,女性作为活体肾脏捐献者的比例过高,而黑人作为活体肾脏捐献者的比例过低。传统的生命伦理学方法会指出,只要活体捐献者认为参与的益处大于风险和危害(有益),并且他们自愿并知情同意,那么人口统计学上的差异仅仅反映了偏好的不同。然而,这种分析忽略了社会、经济和文化决定因素以及各种形式的结构性歧视(例如,种族主义、性别歧视),这些因素可能意味着这种分配的自愿性不如最初看起来的那样。这种分配也引发了关于活体捐献者公平招募和选择的正义问题。我们使用脆弱性分析来研究活体肾脏捐献者人口统计学上的差异,并认为这些性别和种族差异可能不仅仅反映了偏好,而是严重的正义问题,需要在个人和系统层面上加以解决。

相似文献

3
Social Determinants of Health and Race Disparities in Kidney Transplant.健康的社会决定因素与肾脏移植中的种族差异
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):262-274. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04860420. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges of COVID: Lessons Learned From Living Kidney Donors' Experience.新冠疫情的挑战:从活体肾捐献者的经历中吸取的教训
J Patient Exp. 2025 Jul 30;12:23743735251360491. doi: 10.1177/23743735251360491. eCollection 2025.
9
Diversity bias in colorectal surgery: a global perspective.结直肠外科学中的多样性偏见:全球视角。
Updates Surg. 2022 Dec;74(6):1915-1923. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01355-w. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

2
Variation of Testing Practices for Living Kidney Donors.活体肾供体检测方法的差异
Prog Transplant. 2020 Mar;30(1):22-28. doi: 10.1177/1526924819892917. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
5
Equally Interchangeable? How Sex and Gender Affect Transplantation.同样可互换?性别如何影响移植。
Transplantation. 2019 Jun;103(6):1094-1110. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002655.
9
Couples' employment after spousal kidney donation.配偶肾捐赠后的夫妻就业情况。
Soc Work Health Care. 2018 Nov-Dec;57(10):880-889. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2018.1523823. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
10
Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation.制定活体供者移植的伦理框架。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Dec;44(12):843-850. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104762. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验