Department of Living Environment Research, Korea Environment Institute, South Korea.
Department of Living Environment Research, Korea Environment Institute, South Korea; Department of Energy Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, South Korea.
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Jun 5;411:125040. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125040. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
As waste treatment facilities become old, their operation and maintenance costs could increase, which translates to higher treatment costs and environmental burden. This study applies the concept of eco-efficiency to evaluate waste treatment facilities considering the various conditions of waste treatment operations based on the case of Korea. In Korea, waste treatment methods were largely divided into five categories, and facilities for each treatment method were chosen based on their size, location, and waste properties for data collection. The method for evaluating the facilities' eco-efficiencies were developed using the concepts of environmental and economic performances. The results of the eco-efficiency evaluation showed that landfills were most environmentally efficient, followed by the organic waste biogasification facilities, food waste recycling facilities, incineration facilities, and, lastly, combustible waste-to-fuel facilities. The results of the eco-efficiency evaluation were further reviewed in terms of three factors which assess the status of existing facilities as well as to identify the environmental and economic indicators which significantly affect the eco-efficiency of waste treatment facilities by treatment method and propose strategic policies for promoting better waste treatment operations.
随着废物处理设施的老化,其运营和维护成本可能会增加,这意味着处理成本和环境负担更高。本研究将生态效率的概念应用于废物处理设施的评估中,考虑了韩国的各种废物处理作业条件。在韩国,废物处理方法主要分为五类,并根据设施规模、位置和废物特性选择了每种处理方法的设施,以进行数据收集。利用环境和经济绩效的概念制定了设施生态效率评估方法。生态效率评估的结果表明,垃圾填埋场的环境效率最高,其次是有机废物沼气化设施、食物垃圾回收设施、焚烧设施,最后是可燃废物转化为燃料设施。进一步从三个方面审查了生态效率评估的结果,这三个方面评估了现有设施的状况,以及确定了按处理方法显著影响废物处理设施生态效率的环境和经济指标,并提出了促进更好的废物处理作业的战略政策。