Liu Yaqi, Wang Xiaoyuan, Guo Yongqing
School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
College of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science & Technology, Qingdao, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Apr 9;14:423-447. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S301156. eCollection 2021.
Researches addressing driving behaviors have not fully revealed how emotions affect risky driving behaviors and tend to focus on the effects of some negative emotions rather than those of more specific emotions. This study aimed to test the potential moderating effects of eight common driving emotions on the relationship between self-reported individual traits (sensation seeking and driving style) and actual risky driving behaviors, sequentially providing some implications for the risky driving behavior prevention.
A total of 78 licensed drivers were recruited from undergraduate students, company employees and taxi drivers in China. The participants' data on self-reported driving style (SDBS) and self-reported sensation seeking (SSSS) were obtained through questionnaires. The participants' data on actual risky driving behaviors (ARD) in eight driving emotional activation states were obtained through a series of emotion induction experiments and driving experiments. The Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and moderating effect tests were employed to investigate the relationships of driving emotions, SDBS, SSSS and ARD.
Results showed that anger and pleasure affected risky driving behaviors positively by enhancing the relationship between SDBS and ARD, while surprise and fear were negatively related to risky driving behaviors by weakening this relationship. Anxiety positively affected risky driving behaviors by synchronously enhancing the relationship between SDBS and ARD and the relationship between SSSS and ARD, while helplessness and relief affected risky driving behaviors negatively by weakening the two relationships. Contempt affected risky driving behaviors positively by enhancing the relation between SSSS and ARD.
The results illustrated the effects of different emotions on risky driving behaviors, and also partly explained the reasons for these effects. This research provided a source of reference for reducing traffic accidents caused by risky driving behaviors.
针对驾驶行为的研究尚未充分揭示情绪如何影响危险驾驶行为,且往往侧重于某些负面情绪的影响,而非更具体情绪的影响。本研究旨在测试八种常见驾驶情绪对自我报告的个体特质(感觉寻求和驾驶风格)与实际危险驾驶行为之间关系的潜在调节作用,从而为预防危险驾驶行为提供一些启示。
从中国的本科生、公司员工和出租车司机中招募了78名持证司机。通过问卷调查获得参与者关于自我报告驾驶风格(SDBS)和自我报告感觉寻求(SSSS)的数据。通过一系列情绪诱导实验和驾驶实验获得参与者在八种驾驶情绪激活状态下的实际危险驾驶行为(ARD)数据。采用结构方程模型(SEM)和调节效应检验来研究驾驶情绪、SDBS、SSSS和ARD之间的关系。
结果表明,愤怒和愉悦通过增强SDBS与ARD之间的关系对危险驾驶行为产生正向影响,而惊讶和恐惧通过削弱这种关系与危险驾驶行为呈负相关。焦虑通过同时增强SDBS与ARD之间的关系以及SSSS与ARD之间的关系对危险驾驶行为产生正向影响,而无助和放松则通过削弱这两种关系对危险驾驶行为产生负向影响。轻蔑通过增强SSSS与ARD之间的关系对危险驾驶行为产生正向影响。
研究结果说明了不同情绪对危险驾驶行为的影响,也部分解释了这些影响产生的原因。本研究为减少由危险驾驶行为导致的交通事故提供了参考依据。