• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测出租车司机的高风险驾驶行为和侵略性驾驶行为:时空属性重要吗?

Predicting Risky and Aggressive Driving Behavior among Taxi Drivers: Do Spatio-Temporal Attributes Matter?

机构信息

College of Metropolitan Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.

College of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 2;17(11):3937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113937.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17113937
PMID:32498347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7312618/
Abstract

Risky and aggressive driving maneuvers are considered a significant indicator for traffic accident occurrence as well as they aggravate their severity. Traffic violations caused by such uncivilized driving behavior is a global issue. Studies in existing literature have used statistical analysis methods to explore key contributing factors toward aggressive driving and traffic violations. However, such methods are unable to capture latent correlations among predictor variables, and they also suffer from low prediction accuracies. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate different traffic violations using spatial analysis and machine learning methods in the city of Luzhou, China. Violations committed by taxi drivers are the focus of the current study since they constitute a significant proportion of total violations reported in the city. Georeferenced violation data for the year 2016 was obtained from the traffic police department. Detailed descriptive analysis is presented to summarize key statistics about various violation types. Results revealed that over-speeding was the most prevalent violation type observed in the study area. Frequency-based nearest neighborhood cluster methods in Arc map Geographic Information System (GIS) were used to develop hotspot maps for different violation types that are vital for prioritizing and conducting treatment alternatives efficiently. Finally, different machine learning (ML) methods, including decision tree, AdaBoost with a base estimator decision tree, and stack model, were employed to predict and classify each violation type. The proposed methods were compared based on different evaluation metrics like accuracy, F-1 measure, specificity, and log loss. Prediction results demonstrated the adequacy and robustness of proposed machine learning (ML) methods. However, a detailed comparative analysis showed that the stack model outperformed other models in terms of proposed evaluation metrics.

摘要

冒险和激进的驾驶行为被认为是交通事故发生的一个重要指标,并且会使事故的严重程度加剧。这种不文明驾驶行为导致的交通违法行为是一个全球性问题。现有文献中的研究已经使用统计分析方法来探索激进驾驶和交通违法行为的关键影响因素。然而,这些方法无法捕捉预测变量之间的潜在相关性,并且预测精度也较低。本研究旨在利用空间分析和机器学习方法在中国泸州市全面调查不同的交通违法行为。目前的研究重点是出租车司机的违法行为,因为它们构成了该市报告的总违法行为中的很大一部分。从交通警察部门获得了 2016 年的违规地理参考数据。进行了详细的描述性分析,以总结各种违规类型的关键统计信息。结果表明,超速是研究区域中最常见的违规类型。Arc map 地理信息系统(GIS)中的基于频率的最近邻聚类方法用于为不同的违规类型开发热点图,这对于有效地确定优先级和实施处理替代方案至关重要。最后,使用不同的机器学习(ML)方法,包括决策树、基于决策树的 AdaBoost 和堆叠模型,来预测和分类每种违规类型。基于不同的评估指标,如准确性、F-1 度量、特异性和对数损失,对提出的方法进行了比较。预测结果证明了所提出的机器学习(ML)方法的充分性和稳健性。然而,详细的比较分析表明,堆叠模型在提出的评估指标方面优于其他模型。

相似文献

1
Predicting Risky and Aggressive Driving Behavior among Taxi Drivers: Do Spatio-Temporal Attributes Matter?预测出租车司机的高风险驾驶行为和侵略性驾驶行为:时空属性重要吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 2;17(11):3937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113937.
2
Adopting Machine Learning and Spatial Analysis Techniques for Driver Risk Assessment: Insights from a Case Study.采用机器学习和空间分析技术进行驾驶员风险评估:来自案例研究的见解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 18;17(14):5193. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145193.
3
Taxi driver speeding: Who, when, where and how? A comparative study between Shanghai and New York City.出租车司机超速:何人、何时、何地以及如何超速?上海与纽约市的比较研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Apr 3;19(3):311-316. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1391382. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
4
Taxi drivers' traffic violations detection using random forest algorithm: A case study in China.基于随机森林算法的出租车司机交通违规行为检测:以中国为例
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(4):362-370. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2191286. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
5
Predicting Future Driving Risk of Crash-Involved Drivers Based on a Systematic Machine Learning Framework.基于系统机器学习框架预测涉及碰撞的驾驶员未来驾驶风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 25;16(3):334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030334.
6
Understanding key contributing factors on the severity of traffic violations by elderly drivers: a hybrid approach of latent class analysis and XGBoost based SHAP.理解老年驾驶员交通违法行为严重程度的关键影响因素:基于潜在类别分析和 XGBoost 的 SHAP 的混合方法。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2024 Jun;31(2):273-293. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2023.2300479. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
7
Investigating the self-reported behavior of drivers and their attitudes to traffic violations.调查驾驶员的自我报告行为及其对交通违法行为的态度。
J Safety Res. 2013 Sep;46:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
8
Temporal-spatial evolution analysis of severe traffic violations using three functional forms of models considering the diurnal variation of meteorology.考虑气象日变化的三种函数模型形式对严重交通违法行为的时空演化分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Sep;174:106731. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106731. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
9
Effects of personality on risky driving behavior and accident involvement for Chinese drivers.个性对中国驾驶员冒险驾驶行为和事故参与的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(6):565-71. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.748903.
10
Discrepancy analysis of driving performance of taxi drivers and non-professional drivers for red-light running violation and crash avoidance at intersections.出租车司机与非职业司机在十字路口闯红灯违规及避免碰撞方面驾驶性能的差异分析
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jun;91:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping urban mobility using vehicle telematics to understand driving behaviour.利用车辆远程信息处理技术绘制城市交通出行情况以了解驾驶行为。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 8;14(1):3271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53717-6.
2
A dataset of Chinese drivers' driving behaviors and socio-cultural factors related to driving.一个关于中国驾驶员驾驶行为以及与驾驶相关的社会文化因素的数据集。
Data Brief. 2023 Jun 22;49:109337. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109337. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Driving Behaviour in Depression Based on Subjective Evaluation and Data from a Driving Simulator.

本文引用的文献

1
Analyzing the Importance of Driver Behavior Criteria Related to Road Safety for Different Driving Cultures.分析与道路安全相关的驾驶员行为标准在不同驾驶文化中的重要性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 14;17(6):1893. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061893.
2
Short Term Traffic State Prediction via Hyperparameter Optimization Based Classifiers.基于超参数优化的分类器进行短期交通状态预测。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 27;20(3):685. doi: 10.3390/s20030685.
3
The Dilemma of Road Safety in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia: Consequences and Prevention Strategies.
基于主观评价和驾驶模拟器数据的抑郁患者驾驶行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 21;20(8):5609. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085609.
4
Effects of personality traits on bus drivers' prosocial and aggressive behaviours: The moderated mediating role of risk perception and gender.人格特质对公交司机亲社会和攻击行为的影响:风险感知和性别调节的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 7;18(2):e0281473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281473. eCollection 2023.
5
Temporal Instability of Factors Affecting Injury Severity in Helmet-Wearing and Non-Helmet-Wearing Motorcycle Crashes: A Random Parameter Approach with Heterogeneity in Means and Variances.头盔佩戴与未佩戴摩托车事故中影响损伤严重程度因素的时间不稳定性:一种带有均值和方差异质性的随机参数方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;19(17):10526. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710526.
6
The Influence of Personality and Demographic Characteristics on Aggressive Driving Behaviors in Eastern Chinese Drivers.人格与人口统计学特征对中国东部驾驶员攻击性驾驶行为的影响
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Jan 26;15:193-212. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S323431. eCollection 2022.
7
Driver's Personality and Behavior for Boosting Automobile Security and Sensing Health Problems Through Fuzzy Signal Detection Case Study: Mexico City.驾驶员的个性和行为对提升汽车安全性和通过模糊信号检测案例研究感知健康问题的影响:墨西哥城。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 5;21(21):7350. doi: 10.3390/s21217350.
8
Assessment of Significant Factors Affecting Frequent Lane-Changing Related to Road Safety: An Integrated Approach of the AHP-BWM Model.评估影响频繁变道相关道路安全的显著因素:层次分析法-逼近理想解排序法的综合方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;18(20):10628. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010628.
9
Impacts of Autonomous Vehicles on Greenhouse Gas Emissions-Positive or Negative?自动驾驶汽车对温室气体排放的影响——是正面的还是负面的?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 23;18(11):5567. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115567.
10
The Moderating Effects of Emotions on the Relationship Between Self-Reported Individual Traits and Actual Risky Driving Behaviors.情绪对自我报告的个体特质与实际危险驾驶行为之间关系的调节作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Apr 9;14:423-447. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S301156. eCollection 2021.
沙特阿拉伯东部省份道路安全的困境:后果与预防策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 24;17(1):157. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010157.
4
Examining the Walking Accessibility, Willingness, and Travel Conditions of Residents in Saudi Cities.考察沙特城市居民的步行可达性、意愿和出行条件。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 14;16(4):545. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040545.
5
Predicting Future Driving Risk of Crash-Involved Drivers Based on a Systematic Machine Learning Framework.基于系统机器学习框架预测涉及碰撞的驾驶员未来驾驶风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 25;16(3):334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030334.
6
Aberrant Driving Behaviour, Risk Involvement, and Their Related Factors Among Taxi Drivers.出租车司机的异常驾驶行为、风险参与及其相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 1;15(8):1626. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081626.
7
An analysis of the characteristics of road traffic injuries and a prediction of fatalities in China from 1996 to 2015.1996年至2015年中国道路交通事故特征分析及死亡人数预测
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(7):749-754. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1487061. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
8
Safe speed limits for a safe system: The relationship between speed limit and fatal crash rate for different crash types.安全系统的安全速度限制:不同碰撞类型下速度限制与致命碰撞率之间的关系。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 May 19;19(4):404-408. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1422601. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
9
Effects of a penalty point system on traffic violations.记分制对交通违法行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jan;110:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
10
Exploring the association between speed and safety: A path analysis approach.探索速度与安全之间的关联:一种路径分析方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Aug;93:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 May 8.