Roselli Camilla, Ramaswami Mani, Boto Tamara, Cervantes-Sandoval Isaac
Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, School of Genetics and Microbiology, Smurfit Institute of Genetics and School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, Bengaluru, India.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Mar 30;15:662129. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.662129. eCollection 2021.
Understanding the nature of the molecular mechanisms underlying memory formation, consolidation, and forgetting are some of the fascinating questions in modern neuroscience. The encoding, stabilization and elimination of memories, rely on the structural reorganization of synapses. These changes will enable the facilitation or depression of neural activity in response to the acquisition of new information. In other words, these changes affect the weight of specific nodes within a neural network. We know that these plastic reorganizations require protein synthesis in the context of Long-term memory (LTM). This process depends on neural activity triggered by the learned experience. The use of model organisms like has been proven essential for advancing our knowledge in the field of neuroscience. Flies offer an optimal combination of a more straightforward nervous system, composed of a limited number of cells, and while still displaying complex behaviors. Studies in neuroscience, which expanded over several decades, have been critical for understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms leading to the synaptic and behavioral plasticity occurring in the context of learning and memory. This is possible thanks to sophisticated technical approaches that enable precise control of gene expression in the fruit fly as well as neural manipulation, like chemogenetics, thermogenetics, or optogenetics. The search for the identity of genes expressed as a result of memory acquisition has been an active interest since the origins of behavioral genetics. From screenings of more or less specific candidates to broader studies based on transcriptome analysis, our understanding of the genetic control behind LTM has expanded exponentially in the past years. Here we review recent literature regarding how the formation of memories induces a rapid, extensive and, in many cases, transient wave of transcriptional activity. After a consolidation period, transcriptome changes seem more stable and likely represent the synthesis of new proteins. The complexity of the circuitry involved in memory formation and consolidation is such that there are localized changes in neural activity, both regarding temporal dynamics and the nature of neurons and subcellular locations affected, hence inducing specific temporal and localized changes in protein expression. Different types of neurons are recruited at different times into memory traces. In LTM, the synthesis of new proteins is required in specific subsets of cells. This translation can take place in the somatic cytoplasm and/or locally in distinct zones of compartmentalized synaptic activity, depending on the nature of the proteins and the plasticity-inducing processes that occur. We will also review recent advances in understanding how localized changes are confined to the relevant synapse. These recent studies have led to exciting discoveries regarding proteins that were not previously involved in learning and memory processes. This invaluable information will lead to future functional studies on the roles that hundreds of new molecular actors play in modulating neural activity.
理解记忆形成、巩固和遗忘背后的分子机制的本质,是现代神经科学中一些引人入胜的问题。记忆的编码、稳定和消除依赖于突触的结构重组。这些变化将促使神经活动增强或减弱,以响应新信息的获取。换句话说,这些变化会影响神经网络中特定节点的权重。我们知道,在长期记忆(LTM)的背景下,这些可塑性重组需要蛋白质合成。这个过程取决于学习经验触发的神经活动。事实证明,使用果蝇等模式生物对于推进我们在神经科学领域的知识至关重要。果蝇的神经系统更为简单直接,由数量有限的细胞组成,但仍能表现出复杂行为,提供了一种最佳组合。几十年来不断扩展的神经科学研究,对于理解学习和记忆过程中导致突触和行为可塑性的细胞和分子机制至关重要。这得益于先进的技术方法,这些方法能够精确控制果蝇中的基因表达以及进行神经操纵,如化学遗传学、热遗传学或光遗传学。自行为遗传学诞生以来,寻找因记忆获取而表达的基因的身份一直是一个活跃的研究兴趣点。从对或多或少特定候选基因的筛选到基于转录组分析的更广泛研究,在过去几年里,我们对长期记忆背后的基因控制的理解呈指数级增长。在这里,我们回顾最近的文献,探讨记忆形成如何引发快速、广泛且在许多情况下是短暂的转录活动浪潮。经过巩固期后,转录组变化似乎更加稳定,可能代表新蛋白质的合成。参与记忆形成和巩固的神经回路非常复杂,以至于在神经活动方面存在局部变化,包括时间动态以及受影响的神经元和亚细胞位置的性质,从而在蛋白质表达上引发特定的时间和局部变化。不同类型的神经元在不同时间被纳入记忆痕迹。在长期记忆中,特定细胞亚群需要合成新蛋白质。这种翻译可以发生在体细胞细胞质中,和/或在分隔的突触活动的不同区域局部进行,这取决于蛋白质的性质和发生的可塑性诱导过程。我们还将回顾在理解局部变化如何局限于相关突触方面的最新进展。这些最新研究带来了关于以前未参与学习和记忆过程的蛋白质的令人兴奋的发现。这些宝贵信息将引领未来对数百个新分子参与者在调节神经活动中所起作用的功能研究。