• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2020年德国春季封锁期间谁购物更频繁?

Who Was Shopping More During the Spring Lockdown 2020 in Germany?

作者信息

Georgiadou Ekaterini, Koopmann Anne, Müller Astrid, Leménager Tagrid, Hillemacher Thomas, Kiefer Falk

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.

Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 30;12:650989. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650989. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650989
PMID:33859584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8042165/
Abstract

During the lockdown, governmental restrictions resulted in changes to the day-to-day routines of many individuals. Some people appear to cope with stress by panic buying in an attempt to stockpile specific goods, resulting in empty supermarket shelves. Moreover, e-commerce experienced significant growth during this period. We aimed to investigate potential changes in shopping frequencies and preferred shopping type (offline/online) and their relationship with pandemic-specific anxiety and stress during the 2020 spring lockdown in Germany. To address this question, we assessed self-reported changes in shopping behavior in a German sample an online survey conducted during April and May 2020. A total of 3,122 adults were included in the analysis. Of the total sample, 35% reported no changes in their shopping behavior, 46.8% shopped less, while 18.2% shopped more during the lockdown. The groups differed with respect to sociodemographic variables, and those participants who were shopping more reported greater pandemic-related health fears and stress due to the restrictions. Moreover, they shopped online more often during the lockdown than the other two groups. While the majority of the sample reported no changes in their shopping behavior or even shopped less during the 2020 spring lockdown, a subgroup of individuals was shopping more during this time, especially food and drugstore products. It is important to understand which factors influenced individuals to shop more so that policy makers can target this group and prevent panic buying, especially during subsequent waves of infection. It is also important to inform vulnerable persons about the risk of developing a buying-shopping disorder.

摘要

在封锁期间,政府的限制措施导致许多人的日常活动发生了变化。一些人似乎通过恐慌性购买来应对压力,试图囤积特定商品,导致超市货架空空如也。此外,在此期间电子商务经历了显著增长。我们旨在调查2020年德国春季封锁期间购物频率和偏好的购物类型(线下/线上)的潜在变化,以及它们与特定疫情相关的焦虑和压力之间的关系。为了解决这个问题,我们在一个德国样本中评估了自我报告的购物行为变化——这是一项在2020年4月和5月进行的在线调查。共有3122名成年人纳入分析。在总样本中,35%的人报告其购物行为没有变化,46.8%的人购物减少,而18.2%的人在封锁期间购物增多。这些群体在社会人口统计学变量方面存在差异,那些购物增多的参与者报告称,由于限制措施,他们对疫情相关的健康担忧和压力更大。此外,在封锁期间,他们比其他两组更频繁地进行网上购物。虽然大多数样本报告在2020年春季封锁期间其购物行为没有变化,甚至购物减少,但有一小部分人在此期间购物增多,尤其是食品和药店产品。了解哪些因素影响个人购物增多很重要,这样政策制定者就可以针对这一群体并防止恐慌性购买,尤其是在后续感染浪潮期间。告知易受影响的人群发展成购买-购物障碍的风险也很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee0c/8042165/b936dd781648/fpsyt-12-650989-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee0c/8042165/b936dd781648/fpsyt-12-650989-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee0c/8042165/b936dd781648/fpsyt-12-650989-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Who Was Shopping More During the Spring Lockdown 2020 in Germany?2020年德国春季封锁期间谁购物更频繁?
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 30;12:650989. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650989. eCollection 2021.
2
Changes in Food Consumption During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Consumer Survey Data From the First Lockdown Period in Denmark, Germany, and Slovenia.新冠疫情期间的食品消费变化:丹麦、德国和斯洛文尼亚首次封锁期消费者调查数据分析
Front Nutr. 2021 Mar 8;8:635859. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.635859. eCollection 2021.
3
Determinants of the decision to build up excessive food stocks in the COVID-19 crisis.新冠疫情危机中过度建立粮食库存的决定因素。
Appetite. 2022 Sep 1;176:106089. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106089. Epub 2022 May 26.
4
Online shopping in treatment-seeking patients with buying-shopping disorder.治疗性购物障碍患者的网络购物行为。
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;94:152120. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152120. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
5
COVID-19 lockdown: Impact on online gambling, online shopping, web navigation and online pornography.新冠疫情封锁:对在线赌博、在线购物、网络浏览及网络色情内容的影响。
J Public Health Res. 2021 Feb 15;10(1):1759. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2021.1759. eCollection 2021 Jan 14.
6
Pathological buying on the rise? Compensative and compulsive buying in Poland in the pre- and (Post-)pandemic times.病理性购买是否呈上升趋势?波兰在大流行前后时期的补偿性和强迫性购买。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0298856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298856. eCollection 2024.
7
The Urge to Splurge in Time of COVID-19: Emotional Spending, Revenge Buying and Compulsive Shopping.在 COVID-19 期间大肆挥霍的冲动:情绪性消费、报复性购买和强迫性购物。
Psychiatr Danub. 2023 Oct;35(Suppl 2):249-255.
8
Compulsive and compensative buying among online shoppers: An empirical study.网购者的强迫性购买和补偿性购买:一项实证研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 3;16(6):e0252563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252563. eCollection 2021.
9
Cue-induced craving and symptoms of online-buying-shopping disorder interfere with performance on the Iowa Gambling Task modified with online-shopping cues.线索诱发的购物欲望和网购障碍症状会干扰带有网购线索的改良版爱荷华赌博任务的表现。
Addict Behav. 2019 Sep;96:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
10
Is it really "panic buying"? Public perceptions and experiences of extra buying at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.这真的是“恐慌性购买”吗?公众对 COVID-19 大流行初期额外购买的看法和体验。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264618. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Interconnected desires: A systematic review of compulsive buying-shopping disorder and its links to disordered eating and body image by gender.相互关联的欲望:对强迫性购买-购物障碍及其与饮食失调和不同性别人体意象的关联进行的系统综述
J Behav Addict. 2025 May 28;14(2):679-713. doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00042. Print 2025 Jul 2.
2
How Metacognitions Contribute to Compulsive Online Shopping: An Exploratory Study.元认知如何导致强迫性网购:一项探索性研究。
J Clin Psychol. 2025 Feb;81(2):71-80. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23752. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
3
Stressors and coping styles of nursing students in the middle period of clinical practicum: a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Panic Buying in Bangladesh: An Exploration of Media Reports.孟加拉国的抢购潮:对媒体报道的探究
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 18;11:628393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.628393. eCollection 2020.
2
COVID-19 Lockdown Restrictions and Online Media Consumption in Germany.德国的 COVID-19 封锁限制和在线媒体消费
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 22;18(1):14. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010014.
3
Responsible Factors of Panic Buying: An Observation From Online Media Reports.抢购的责任因素:来自在线媒体报道的观察。
临床实习中期护理专业学生的压力源与应对方式:一项质性研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 7;23(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02063-z.
4
Comparison of clinicians' and researchers' ratings of proposed diagnostic criteria for compulsive buying-shopping disorder within a Delphi study.在德尔菲研究中比较临床医生和研究人员对强迫症购物障碍拟议诊断标准的评分。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 4;18(4):e0283978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283978. eCollection 2023.
5
Problematic Shopping Behavior: An Item Response Theory Examination of the Seven-Item Bergen Shopping Addiction Scale.问题购物行为:基于项目反应理论对七项卑尔根购物成瘾量表的检验
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022 Jun 20:1-19. doi: 10.1007/s11469-022-00844-8.
6
Gendered Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Food Behaviors in North Africa: Cases of Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia.新冠疫情对北非国家民众饮食行为的性别影响:以埃及、摩洛哥和突尼斯为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 15;19(4):2192. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042192.
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 5;8:603894. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.603894. eCollection 2020.
4
Object attachment in buying-shopping disorder.购买-购物障碍中的客体依附
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Jun;39:115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.019. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Development and initial psychometric properties of a panic buying scale during COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间恐慌性购买量表的编制及初步心理测量学特性
Heliyon. 2020 Sep;6(9):e04746. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04746. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
6
Panic buying: An insight from the content analysis of media reports during COVID-19 pandemic.恐慌性购买:对新冠疫情期间媒体报道的内容分析洞察
Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 2020 Sep;37:100-103. doi: 10.1016/j.npbr.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
7
Internet-based surveys: relevance, methodological considerations and troubleshooting strategies.基于互联网的调查:相关性、方法学考量及故障排除策略
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Aug 1;33(5):e100264. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100264. eCollection 2020.
8
Panic buying or good adherence? Increased pharmacy purchases of drugs from wholesalers in the last week prior to Covid-19 lockdown.抢购还是良好的依从性?在新冠疫情封锁前的最后一周,从批发商处购买的药物增加了。
J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Nov;130:19-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
9
COVID-19 and addiction.新型冠状病毒肺炎与成瘾
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):817-823. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
10
Influence of perceived threat of Covid-19 and HEXACO personality traits on toilet paper stockpiling.新冠病毒威胁感知和 HEXACO 人格特质对卫生纸囤货的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 12;15(6):e0234232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234232. eCollection 2020.