Suppr超能文献

抢购的责任因素:来自在线媒体报道的观察。

Responsible Factors of Panic Buying: An Observation From Online Media Reports.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Enam Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Department of Psychiatry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 5;8:603894. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.603894. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Panic buying is an erratic human behavior that has been reported irregularly and episodically. There is a dearth of studies exploring the identifiable factors accounting for it. We aimed to identify the factors responsible for panic buying extracted from online media reports. We scrutinized the media reports published in English discussing the different aspects of panic buying. We collected data until May 30, 2020, and searched the possible mentioned reasons responsible for panic buying. We analyzed a total of 784 media reports. The majority of the reports were found in Bing (18%), Ecosia (12.6%), Google (26.4%), and Yahoo (12.5%). Panic buying was reported in 93 countries. Among the 784 responses, a total of 171 reports did not explain the responsible factors of panic buying. Therefore, we analyzed the remaining 613 reports to identify the same. A sense of scarcity was reportedly found as the important factor in about 75% of the reports followed by increased demand (66.07%), the importance of the product (45.02%), anticipation of price hike (23.33%), and due to COVID-19 and its related factors (13.21%). Other reported factors were a rumor, psychological factors (safety-seeking behavior, uncertainty, anxiety reduction, and taking control), social learning, lack of trust, government action, and past experience. The study revealed the responsible factors of panic buying extracted from media reports. Further, studies involving the individuals indulging in panic buying behavior are warranted to replicate the findings.

摘要

抢购是一种不稳定的人类行为,有报道称这种行为不规则且间歇性发生。目前,研究探索导致抢购的可识别因素的研究很少。我们旨在从在线媒体报道中确定导致抢购的因素。我们仔细研究了用英语讨论抢购不同方面的媒体报道。我们收集的数据截至 2020 年 5 月 30 日,并搜索了可能提到的导致抢购的原因。我们总共分析了 784 份媒体报道。大多数报道来自 Bing(18%)、Ecosia(12.6%)、Google(26.4%)和 Yahoo(12.5%)。抢购行为报告发生在 93 个国家。在 784 条回复中,共有 171 条报道没有解释抢购的原因。因此,我们分析了其余的 613 条报告来确定相同的原因。大约 75%的报道称,稀缺感是重要因素,其次是需求增加(66.07%)、产品重要性(45.02%)、预期价格上涨(23.33%)以及 COVID-19 及其相关因素(13.21%)。其他报道的因素包括谣言、心理因素(寻求安全行为、不确定性、减轻焦虑和控制)、社会学习、缺乏信任、政府行动和以往经验。该研究揭示了从媒体报道中提取的导致抢购的因素。此外,有必要对参与抢购行为的个体进行研究,以复制这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8474/7674549/62782ed03d97/fpubh-08-603894-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验