文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

抢购的责任因素:来自在线媒体报道的观察。

Responsible Factors of Panic Buying: An Observation From Online Media Reports.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Enam Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Department of Psychiatry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 5;8:603894. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.603894. eCollection 2020.


DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.603894
PMID:33224924
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7674549/
Abstract

Panic buying is an erratic human behavior that has been reported irregularly and episodically. There is a dearth of studies exploring the identifiable factors accounting for it. We aimed to identify the factors responsible for panic buying extracted from online media reports. We scrutinized the media reports published in English discussing the different aspects of panic buying. We collected data until May 30, 2020, and searched the possible mentioned reasons responsible for panic buying. We analyzed a total of 784 media reports. The majority of the reports were found in Bing (18%), Ecosia (12.6%), Google (26.4%), and Yahoo (12.5%). Panic buying was reported in 93 countries. Among the 784 responses, a total of 171 reports did not explain the responsible factors of panic buying. Therefore, we analyzed the remaining 613 reports to identify the same. A sense of scarcity was reportedly found as the important factor in about 75% of the reports followed by increased demand (66.07%), the importance of the product (45.02%), anticipation of price hike (23.33%), and due to COVID-19 and its related factors (13.21%). Other reported factors were a rumor, psychological factors (safety-seeking behavior, uncertainty, anxiety reduction, and taking control), social learning, lack of trust, government action, and past experience. The study revealed the responsible factors of panic buying extracted from media reports. Further, studies involving the individuals indulging in panic buying behavior are warranted to replicate the findings.

摘要

抢购是一种不稳定的人类行为,有报道称这种行为不规则且间歇性发生。目前,研究探索导致抢购的可识别因素的研究很少。我们旨在从在线媒体报道中确定导致抢购的因素。我们仔细研究了用英语讨论抢购不同方面的媒体报道。我们收集的数据截至 2020 年 5 月 30 日,并搜索了可能提到的导致抢购的原因。我们总共分析了 784 份媒体报道。大多数报道来自 Bing(18%)、Ecosia(12.6%)、Google(26.4%)和 Yahoo(12.5%)。抢购行为报告发生在 93 个国家。在 784 条回复中,共有 171 条报道没有解释抢购的原因。因此,我们分析了其余的 613 条报告来确定相同的原因。大约 75%的报道称,稀缺感是重要因素,其次是需求增加(66.07%)、产品重要性(45.02%)、预期价格上涨(23.33%)以及 COVID-19 及其相关因素(13.21%)。其他报道的因素包括谣言、心理因素(寻求安全行为、不确定性、减轻焦虑和控制)、社会学习、缺乏信任、政府行动和以往经验。该研究揭示了从媒体报道中提取的导致抢购的因素。此外,有必要对参与抢购行为的个体进行研究,以复制这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8474/7674549/0e323c6ebb97/fpubh-08-603894-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8474/7674549/62782ed03d97/fpubh-08-603894-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8474/7674549/0a3621e4cf9d/fpubh-08-603894-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8474/7674549/0e323c6ebb97/fpubh-08-603894-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8474/7674549/62782ed03d97/fpubh-08-603894-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8474/7674549/0a3621e4cf9d/fpubh-08-603894-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8474/7674549/0e323c6ebb97/fpubh-08-603894-g0003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Responsible Factors of Panic Buying: An Observation From Online Media Reports.

Front Public Health. 2020

[2]
Panic Buying in Bangladesh: An Exploration of Media Reports.

Front Psychiatry. 2021-1-18

[3]
Panic buying: An insight from the content analysis of media reports during COVID-19 pandemic.

Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 2020-9

[4]
The Psychological Causes of Panic Buying Following a Health Crisis.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-5-18

[5]
Anxiety and Panic Buying Behaviour during COVID-19 Pandemic-A Qualitative Analysis of Toilet Paper Hoarding Contents on Twitter.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-1-27

[6]
Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19.

Psychiatry Res. 2021-9

[7]
Anxiety, depression, and stress: Can mental health variables predict panic buying?

J Psychiatr Res. 2021-12

[8]
Perceived Impact of Social Media on Panic Buying: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey in Iraqi Kurdistan.

Front Public Health. 2021

[9]
The Determinants of Panic Buying during COVID-19.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-3-21

[10]
A Cross-sectional Study of Antecedents and Consequence of Panic Buying Behavior: The Moderating Effect of COVID-19 Rumors.

Inquiry. 2022

引用本文的文献

[1]
Is it time to stock up? Understanding panic buying during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aust J Psychol. 2023-3-16

[2]
Interconnected desires: A systematic review of compulsive buying-shopping disorder and its links to disordered eating and body image by gender.

J Behav Addict. 2025-5-28

[3]
Study on the influencing factors and intervention strategies of public panic buying during public health emergencies.

BMC Public Health. 2024-12-18

[4]
The personality puzzle: a comprehensive analysis of its impact on three buying behaviors.

Front Psychiatry. 2023-8-21

[5]
Understanding the importance and timing of panic buying among U.S. Households during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Food Qual Prefer. 2021-10

[6]
The impact of paid social Q&A on panic buying and digital hoarding at the stage of coexistence with COVID-19: The moderating role of sensitivity to pain of payment.

Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023-1

[7]
Factors Affecting Panic Buying during COVID-19 Outbreak and Strategies: A Scoping Review.

Iran J Public Health. 2021-12

[8]
Uneven Implications of Lockdown Amid COVID-19 in India: From Harassment, Stigma, Crime, and Internally Displaced People to Stress and Coping Strategies in the Middle/Upper Class.

Behav Sci (Basel). 2022-9-21

[9]
Public health literacy unsold during panic buying.

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022-8

[10]
How does social class shape women's alcohol stockpiling during COVID-19?: A qualitative study in South Australia during the 2020 lockdown.

SSM Qual Res Health. 2022-12

本文引用的文献

[1]
Panic buying: Is it really a problem?

Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021-8

[2]
Possible Controlling Measures of Panic Buying During COVID-19.

Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021

[3]
Panic buying: An insight from the content analysis of media reports during COVID-19 pandemic.

Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 2020-9

[4]
The Psychological Causes of Panic Buying Following a Health Crisis.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-5-18

[5]
Psychological underpinning of panic buying during pandemic (COVID-19).

Psychiatry Res. 2020-7

[6]
The Impact of Social Media on Panic During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Iraqi Kurdistan: Online Questionnaire Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-5-19

[7]
The anatomy of panic buying related to the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Psychiatry Res. 2020-6

[8]
Anticipating Economic Market Crises Using Measures of Collective Panic.

PLoS One. 2015-7-17

[9]
An iatrogenic pandemic of panic.

BMJ. 2006-4-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索