Suppr超能文献

慈心冥想与认知加工疗法治疗退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的随机临床试验。

Loving-Kindness Meditation vs Cognitive Processing Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216604. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6604.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Additional options are needed for treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among veterans.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether group loving-kindness meditation is noninferior to group cognitive processing therapy for treatment of PTSD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical noninferiority trial assessed PTSD and depression at baseline, posttreatment, and 3- and 6-month follow-up. Veterans were recruited from September 24, 2014, to February 5, 2018, from a large Veternas Affairs medical center in Seattle, Washington. A total of 184 veteran volunteers who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) criteria for PTSD were randomized. Data collection was completed November 28, 2018, and data analyses were conducted from December 10, 2018, to November 5, 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Each intervention comprised 12 weekly 90-minute group sessions. Loving-kindness meditation (n = 91) involves silent repetition of phrases intended to elicit feelings of kindness for oneself and others. Cognitive processing therapy (n = 93) combines cognitive restructuring with emotional processing of trauma-related content.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Co-primary outcomes were change in PTSD and depression scores over 6-month follow-up, assessed by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5; range, 0-80; higher is worse) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS; reported as standardized T-score with mean [SD] of 50 [10] points; higher is worse) depression measures. Noninferiority margins were 5 points on the CAPS-5 and 4 points on the PROMIS depression measure.

RESULTS

Among the 184 veterans (mean [SD] age, 57.1 [13.1] years; 153 men [83.2%]; 107 White participants [58.2%]) included in the study, 91 (49.5%) were randomized to the loving-kindness group, and 93 (50.5%) were randomized to the cognitive processing group. The mean (SD) baseline CAPS-5 score was 35.5 (11.8) and mean (SD) PROMIS depression score was 60.9 (7.9). A total of 121 veterans (66%) completed 6-month follow-up. At 6 months posttreatment, mean CAPS-5 scores were 28.02 (95% CI, 24.72-31.32) for cognitive processing therapy and 25.92 (95% CI, 22.62-29.23) for loving-kindness meditation (difference, 2.09; 95% CI, -2.59 to 6.78), and mean PROMIS depression scores were 61.22 (95% CI, 59.21-63.23) for cognitive processing therapy and 58.88 (95% CI, 56.86-60.91) for loving-kindness meditation (difference, 2.34; 95% CI, -0.52 to 5.19). In superiority analyses, there were no significant between-group differences in CAPS-5 scores, whereas for PROMIS depression scores, greater reductions were found for loving-kindness meditation vs cognitive processing therapy (for patients attending ≥6 visits, ≥4-point improvement was noted in 24 [39.3%] veterans receiving loving-kindness meditation vs 9 (18.0%) receiving cognitive processing therapy; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among veterans with PTSD, loving-kindness meditation resulted in reductions in PTSD symptoms that were noninferior to group cognitive processing therapy. For both interventions, the magnitude of improvement in PTSD symptoms was modest. Change over time in depressive symptoms was greater for loving-kindness meditation than for cognitive processing therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01962714.

摘要

重要性:对于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的治疗,需要更多的选择。

目的:确定团体慈悲冥想是否不如团体认知处理疗法治疗 PTSD。

设计、地点和参与者:这项随机临床非劣效性试验在基线、治疗后以及 3 个月和 6 个月随访时评估 PTSD 和抑郁。从 2014 年 9 月 24 日至 2018 年 2 月 5 日,从华盛顿州西雅图的一家大型退伍军人事务医疗中心招募了退伍军人志愿者。共有 184 名符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(第五版) PTSD 标准的退伍军人志愿者被随机分组。数据收集于 2018 年 11 月 28 日完成,数据分析于 2018 年 12 月 10 日至 2019 年 11 月 5 日进行。

干预措施:每个干预组包括 12 次每周 90 分钟的小组会议。慈悲冥想(n=91)涉及重复表达意图唤起对自己和他人的善意的短语。认知处理疗法(n=93)将认知重构与创伤相关内容的情绪处理相结合。

主要结果和措施:主要的次要结局是 6 个月随访期间 PTSD 和抑郁评分的变化,使用临床医生管理的 PTSD 量表(CAPS-5;范围,0-80;分数越高越差)和患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS;以 50[10]点的标准化 T 分数报告,平均[标准差]为 50[10]点;分数越高越差)进行评估。非劣效性边界为 CAPS-5 上的 5 分和 PROMIS 抑郁量表上的 4 分。

结果:在纳入研究的 184 名退伍军人(平均[标准差]年龄 57.1[13.1]岁;男性 153 人[83.2%];白种人参与者 107 人[58.2%])中,91 人(49.5%)被随机分配到慈悲冥想组,93 人(50.5%)被随机分配到认知处理组。平均(SD)基线 CAPS-5 评分为 35.5(11.8),平均(SD)PROMIS 抑郁评分为 60.9(7.9)。共有 121 名退伍军人(66%)完成了 6 个月的随访。治疗后 6 个月时,认知处理疗法的平均 CAPS-5 评分分别为 28.02(95%CI,24.72-31.32)和慈悲冥想疗法的 25.92(95%CI,22.62-29.23)(差异为 2.09;95%CI,-2.59 至 6.78),认知处理疗法的平均 PROMIS 抑郁评分分别为 61.22(95%CI,59.21-63.23)和慈悲冥想疗法的 58.88(95%CI,56.86-60.91)(差异为 2.34;95%CI,-0.52 至 5.19)。在优势分析中,两组间 CAPS-5 评分无显著差异,而对于 PROMIS 抑郁评分,慈悲冥想疗法的降幅大于认知处理疗法(对于参加≥6 次就诊的患者,接受慈悲冥想疗法的 24 名(39.3%)退伍军人中≥4 分的改善率高于接受认知处理疗法的 9 名(18.0%);P=0.03)。

结论和相关性:在 PTSD 退伍军人中,慈悲冥想导致 PTSD 症状的减轻,与团体认知处理疗法相当。对于两种干预措施,PTSD 症状改善的幅度都很小。慈悲冥想治疗组的抑郁症状随时间的变化大于认知处理治疗组。

试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01962714。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da07/8052593/132c5a4edb27/jamanetwopen-e216604-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验