Suppr超能文献

基于自然的解决方案在实现生态公正城市方面的潜力:系统文献回顾为研究和城市规划提供的启示。

The potential of nature-based solutions to deliver ecologically just cities: Lessons for research and urban planning from a systematic literature review.

机构信息

Centre for Urban Transitions, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Ambio. 2022 Jan;51(1):167-182. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01553-7. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

Abstract

Planning for and implementing multifunctional nature-based solutions can improve urban ecosystems' adaptation to climate change, foster urban resilience, and enable social and environmental innovation. There is, however, a knowledge gap in how to design and plan nature-based solutions in a nonanthropocentric manner that enhances co-benefits for humans and nonhuman living organisms. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review to explore how an ecological justice perspective can advance the understanding of nature-based solutions. We argue that ecological justice, which builds on the equitable distribution of environmental goods and bads, social-ecological interconnectedness, nature's agency and capabilities, and participation and inclusion in decision-making, provides a transformative framework for rethinking nature-based solutions in and for cities. A qualitative analysis of 121 peer-reviewed records shows a highly human-centred worldview for delivering nature-based solutions and a relationship to social justice with no direct reference to the dimensions of ecological justice. There is, however, an underlying recognition of the importance of nonhumans, ecosystem integrity and well-being, and a need to consider their needs and capacities through multispecies nature-based solutions design and planning. We conclude with a discussion of the critical aspects for designing and planning ecologically just cities through nature-based solutions and future research directions to further integrate these fields.

摘要

规划和实施多功能的基于自然的解决方案可以提高城市生态系统对气候变化的适应能力,增强城市韧性,并促进社会和环境创新。然而,如何以非人类中心主义的方式设计和规划基于自然的解决方案,以增强人类和非人类生物的共同利益,这方面存在知识空白。为了解决这一空白,我们进行了系统的文献回顾,以探讨生态正义视角如何推进对基于自然的解决方案的理解。我们认为,生态正义建立在环境商品和危害的公平分配、社会-生态相互联系、自然的代理和能力以及参与和包容决策的基础上,为重新思考城市内部和城市中的基于自然的解决方案提供了一个变革性的框架。对 121 篇同行评议记录的定性分析表明,提供基于自然的解决方案的世界观高度以人为中心,与社会正义有关,但没有直接提到生态正义的维度。然而,人们已经认识到非人类、生态系统完整性和福祉的重要性,需要通过基于多物种的自然解决方案设计和规划来考虑它们的需求和能力。最后,我们讨论了通过基于自然的解决方案设计和规划生态正义城市的关键方面,并提出了进一步整合这些领域的未来研究方向。

相似文献

6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
10
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.

本文引用的文献

4
The social dimensions of a river's environmental quality assessment.河流环境质量评估的社会层面。
Ambio. 2019 Apr;48(4):409-422. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1089-9. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
6
Do non-native species contribute to biodiversity?非本地物种对生物多样性有贡献吗?
PLoS Biol. 2018 Apr 17;16(4):e2005568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005568. eCollection 2018 Apr.
7
Urban Green Space and Its Impact on Human Health.城市绿地及其对人类健康的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 3;15(3):445. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030445.
9
Nature-based solutions for resilient landscapes and cities.基于自然的解决方案,打造有韧性的城乡景观。
Environ Res. 2018 Aug;165:431-441. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.038. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验