• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The potential of nature-based solutions to deliver ecologically just cities: Lessons for research and urban planning from a systematic literature review.基于自然的解决方案在实现生态公正城市方面的潜力:系统文献回顾为研究和城市规划提供的启示。
Ambio. 2022 Jan;51(1):167-182. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01553-7. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
5
Transformative low-carbon urban innovations: Operationalizing transformative capacity for urban planning.变革性低碳城市创新:为城市规划实施变革能力。
Ambio. 2022 May;51(5):1179-1198. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01653-4. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
Introducing the dataset for measuring centrality for sustainability-A case study of Pecinci municipality, Serbia.介绍用于衡量可持续性中心性的数据集——以塞尔维亚佩钦奇市为例
Data Brief. 2025 May 27;61:111714. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111714. eCollection 2025 Aug.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking trade-offs in nature-based solutions from a multispecies justice perspective.从多物种正义视角重新审视基于自然的解决方案中的权衡取舍。
NPJ Urban Sustain. 2025;5(1):67. doi: 10.1038/s42949-025-00261-5. Epub 2025 Aug 18.
2
Inter- and transdisciplinary knowledge is critical for nature-based solutions to contribute to just urban transformations.跨学科和多学科知识对于基于自然的解决方案促进公正的城市转型至关重要。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 22;122(29):e2315911121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2315911121. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
3
Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions.将基于自然的城市解决方案纳入主流的全球综合情况与区域见解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 22;122(29):e2315910121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2315910121. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
4
Realizing multispecies justice through a capability approach to promote nature-based solutions.通过基于能力的方法实现多物种正义,以促进基于自然的解决方案。
NPJ Urban Sustain. 2025;5(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s42949-025-00205-z. Epub 2025 May 28.
5
A transformative mission for prioritising nature in Australian cities.将自然置于澳大利亚城市规划的优先地位——一项具有变革意义的使命。
Ambio. 2022 Jun;51(6):1433-1445. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01725-z. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct and indirect effects of urban gardening on aboveground and belowground diversity influencing soil multifunctionality.城市园艺对地上和地下多样性的直接和间接影响,影响土壤多功能性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 5;9(1):9769. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46024-y.
2
Neighborhood Parks and Recreationists' Exposure to Ozone: A Comparison of Disadvantaged and Affluent Communities in Los Angeles, California.社区公园和休闲者接触臭氧的情况:加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的贫困社区和富裕社区的比较。
Environ Manage. 2019 Mar;63(3):379-395. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01140-3. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
3
Designing a network of green infrastructure to enhance the conservation value of protected areas and maintain ecosystem services.设计绿色基础设施网络,以提高保护区的保护价值并维持生态系统服务。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 1):541-550. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.164. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
4
The social dimensions of a river's environmental quality assessment.河流环境质量评估的社会层面。
Ambio. 2019 Apr;48(4):409-422. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1089-9. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
5
Physical and Mental Health Impacts of Household Gardens in an Urban Slum in Lima, Peru.秘鲁利马市区贫民窟家庭园艺对身心健康的影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 15;15(8):1751. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081751.
6
Do non-native species contribute to biodiversity?非本地物种对生物多样性有贡献吗?
PLoS Biol. 2018 Apr 17;16(4):e2005568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005568. eCollection 2018 Apr.
7
Urban Green Space and Its Impact on Human Health.城市绿地及其对人类健康的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 3;15(3):445. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030445.
8
Birds in the playground: Evaluating the effectiveness of an urban environmental education project in enhancing school children's awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards local wildlife.校园里的鸟儿:评估城市环境教育项目对提高学童对当地野生动物的意识、知识和态度的有效性。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 6;13(3):e0193993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193993. eCollection 2018.
9
Nature-based solutions for resilient landscapes and cities.基于自然的解决方案,打造有韧性的城乡景观。
Environ Res. 2018 Aug;165:431-441. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.038. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
10
Assessing ecosystem service provision under climate change to support conservation and development planning in Myanmar.评估气候变化下的生态系统服务供给,以支持缅甸的保护和发展规划。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0184951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184951. eCollection 2017.

基于自然的解决方案在实现生态公正城市方面的潜力:系统文献回顾为研究和城市规划提供的启示。

The potential of nature-based solutions to deliver ecologically just cities: Lessons for research and urban planning from a systematic literature review.

机构信息

Centre for Urban Transitions, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Ambio. 2022 Jan;51(1):167-182. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01553-7. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-021-01553-7
PMID:33864236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8651950/
Abstract

Planning for and implementing multifunctional nature-based solutions can improve urban ecosystems' adaptation to climate change, foster urban resilience, and enable social and environmental innovation. There is, however, a knowledge gap in how to design and plan nature-based solutions in a nonanthropocentric manner that enhances co-benefits for humans and nonhuman living organisms. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review to explore how an ecological justice perspective can advance the understanding of nature-based solutions. We argue that ecological justice, which builds on the equitable distribution of environmental goods and bads, social-ecological interconnectedness, nature's agency and capabilities, and participation and inclusion in decision-making, provides a transformative framework for rethinking nature-based solutions in and for cities. A qualitative analysis of 121 peer-reviewed records shows a highly human-centred worldview for delivering nature-based solutions and a relationship to social justice with no direct reference to the dimensions of ecological justice. There is, however, an underlying recognition of the importance of nonhumans, ecosystem integrity and well-being, and a need to consider their needs and capacities through multispecies nature-based solutions design and planning. We conclude with a discussion of the critical aspects for designing and planning ecologically just cities through nature-based solutions and future research directions to further integrate these fields.

摘要

规划和实施多功能的基于自然的解决方案可以提高城市生态系统对气候变化的适应能力,增强城市韧性,并促进社会和环境创新。然而,如何以非人类中心主义的方式设计和规划基于自然的解决方案,以增强人类和非人类生物的共同利益,这方面存在知识空白。为了解决这一空白,我们进行了系统的文献回顾,以探讨生态正义视角如何推进对基于自然的解决方案的理解。我们认为,生态正义建立在环境商品和危害的公平分配、社会-生态相互联系、自然的代理和能力以及参与和包容决策的基础上,为重新思考城市内部和城市中的基于自然的解决方案提供了一个变革性的框架。对 121 篇同行评议记录的定性分析表明,提供基于自然的解决方案的世界观高度以人为中心,与社会正义有关,但没有直接提到生态正义的维度。然而,人们已经认识到非人类、生态系统完整性和福祉的重要性,需要通过基于多物种的自然解决方案设计和规划来考虑它们的需求和能力。最后,我们讨论了通过基于自然的解决方案设计和规划生态正义城市的关键方面,并提出了进一步整合这些领域的未来研究方向。