Wijsman Katinka, Pineda-Pinto Melissa, Sarkki Simo, Stijnen Charlotte, den Dekker-Arlain Janneke, Raymond Christopher M
Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Melbourne Centre for Cities, Faculty of Architecture Building and Planning, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
NPJ Urban Sustain. 2025;5(1):67. doi: 10.1038/s42949-025-00261-5. Epub 2025 Aug 18.
Trade-offs in nature-based solutions are increasingly recognized, with novel research interrogating their justice implications. Yet, these trade-offs and justice implications remain entrenched in an anthropocentric orientation, which is problematic in ecological and ethical terms. We discuss four common assumptions on trade-offs in NBS (instrumentalism, neutrality of science, collaborative consensus, and unitemporality) and rethink them through a multispecies justice lens, maintaining that dealing with trade-offs is a form of interspecies politics.
基于自然的解决方案中的权衡日益受到认可，新的研究正在审视其对正义的影响。然而，这些权衡和正义影响仍然固着于人类中心主义取向，这在生态和伦理方面都存在问题。我们讨论了关于基于自然的解决方案中权衡的四个常见假设（工具主义、科学中立性、协作共识和同时性），并通过多物种正义视角对其进行重新思考，坚持认为应对权衡是一种物种间政治的形式。
