Suppr超能文献

使用高频局部场电位进行注意力状态解码的准确性与使用尖峰一样高。

Decoding of Attentional State Using High-Frequency Local Field Potential Is As Accurate As Using Spikes.

机构信息

Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.

IISc Mathematics Initiative, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jul 29;31(9):4314-4328. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab088.

Abstract

Local field potentials (LFPs) in visual cortex are reliably modulated when the subject's focus of attention is cued into versus out of the receptive field of the recorded sites, similar to modulation of spikes. However, human psychophysics studies have used an additional attention condition, neutral cueing, for decades. The effect of neutral cueing on spikes was examined recently and found to be intermediate between cued and uncued conditions. However, whether LFPs are also precise enough to represent graded states of attention is unknown. We found in rhesus monkeys that LFPs during neutral cueing were also intermediate between cued and uncued conditions. For a single electrode, attention was more discriminable using high frequency (>30 Hz) LFP power than spikes, which is expected because LFP represents a population signal and therefore is expected to be less noisy than spikes. However, previous studies have shown that when multiple electrodes are used, spikes can outperform LFPs. Surprisingly, in our study, spikes did not outperform LFPs when discriminability was computed using multiple electrodes, even though the LFP activity was highly correlated across electrodes compared with spikes. These results constrain the spatial scale over which attention operates and highlight the usefulness of LFPs in studying attention.

摘要

当被试的注意力焦点被提示进入或离开记录部位的感受野时,视觉皮层中的局部场电位 (LFPs) 会被可靠地调制,类似于尖峰的调制。然而,人类心理物理学研究已经使用了额外的注意条件——中性提示,这一情况已经持续了几十年。最近研究了中性提示对尖峰的影响,发现它介于提示和未提示条件之间。然而,LFPs 是否也足够精确地表示注意力的渐变状态尚不清楚。我们在恒河猴中发现,中性提示期间的 LFPs 也介于提示和未提示条件之间。对于单个电极,使用高频(>30 Hz)LFp 功率比尖峰更能区分注意力,这是预期的,因为 LFp 代表群体信号,因此预计比尖峰噪声更小。然而,之前的研究表明,当使用多个电极时,尖峰可以比 LFPs 更好地表现。令人惊讶的是,在我们的研究中,当使用多个电极计算可辨别性时,尖峰并没有优于 LFPs,尽管与尖峰相比,LFp 活动在电极之间具有高度相关性。这些结果限制了注意力运作的空间尺度,并强调了 LFPs 在研究注意力方面的有用性。

相似文献

5
6
Inferring spike trains from local field potentials.从局部场电位推断尖峰序列。
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Mar;99(3):1461-76. doi: 10.1152/jn.00919.2007. Epub 2007 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

7
Decoding of attentional state using local field potentials.使用局部场电位进行注意状态解码。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2022 Oct;76:102589. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2022.102589. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

6
Cortical Electrocorticogram (ECoG) Is a Local Signal.皮层脑电图(ECoG)是一种局部信号。
J Neurosci. 2019 May 29;39(22):4299-4311. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2917-18.2019. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
7
A Rhythmic Theory of Attention.注意的节奏理论。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Feb;23(2):87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Dec 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验