Prakash Surya S, Mayo J Patrick, Ray Supratim
Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, 560012.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 15219.
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 15:2023.08.05.552102. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.05.552102.
Successful behavior depends on attentional state and other factors related to decision-making, which may modulate neuronal activity differently. Here, we investigated whether attentional state and behavioral outcome (i.e., whether a target is detected or missed) are distinguishable using the power and phase of local field potential (LFP) recorded bilaterally from area V4 of monkeys performing a cued visual attention task. To link each trial's outcome to pairwise measures of attention that are typically averaged across trials, we used several methods to obtain single-trial estimates of spike count correlation and phase consistency. Surprisingly, while attentional location was best discriminated using gamma and high-gamma power, behavioral outcome was best discriminated by alpha power and steady-state visually evoked potential. Power outperformed absolute phase in attentional/behavioral discriminability, although single-trial gamma phase consistency provided reasonably high attentional discriminability. Our results suggest a dissociation between the neuronal mechanisms that regulate attentional focus and behavioral outcome.
成功的行为取决于注意力状态以及与决策相关的其他因素,这些因素可能会以不同方式调节神经元活动。在这里,我们研究了在执行线索化视觉注意力任务的猴子的V4区域双侧记录的局部场电位(LFP)的功率和相位是否能够区分注意力状态和行为结果(即是否检测到目标或未检测到目标)。为了将每个试验的结果与通常在试验中进行平均的注意力成对测量联系起来,我们使用了几种方法来获得尖峰计数相关性和相位一致性的单试验估计值。令人惊讶的是,虽然使用伽马和高伽马功率能够最好地区分注意力位置,但行为结果最好通过阿尔法功率和稳态视觉诱发电位来区分。在注意力/行为可辨别性方面,功率优于绝对相位,尽管单试验伽马相位一致性提供了相当高的注意力可辨别性。我们的结果表明,调节注意力焦点和行为结果的神经元机制之间存在分离。