• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物研发与定性向团队学习过渡的过程。

Drug development and the process of transitioning to team-based learning in a qualitative way.

机构信息

Washington State University, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 412 E Spokane Falls Blvd, Spokane, WA 99202, United States.

出版信息

Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Jun;13(6):723-728. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.01.025. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2021.01.025
PMID:33867071
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination and the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment are two standardized tests that evaluate students' preparedness to progress into pharmacy practice. Pharmacy educators are responsible for ensuring individual learners are engaged in course material and take appropriate steps to succeed in meeting learning outcomes. Whenever a new pedagogy is adopted in a previously existing course, understanding the impact on learners is critical.

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING

Team-based learning (TBL) was implemented within a novel Drug Discovery and Development course to measure the impact in active participation and student performance within the second year of pharmacy school. Survey data was collected to gather pharmacy students' perspectives regarding the pedagogy change. Examination competency scores and active participation were tracked to measure student engagement.

FINDINGS

Survey results revealed students agreed or strongly agreed that Drug Discovery and Development was enjoyable when taught with a TBL model, created a conductive learning environment, and improved their perceived knowledge, communication skills, and confidence. Average attendance scores were > 90% in a TBL setting. No change in block exam competency scores were noted across the three academic cohorts.

SUMMARY

Students agreed that Drug Discovery and Development was enjoyable when taught using TBL, created a conductive learning environment, and improved their perceived knowledge, communication skills, and confidence. Additional research should be conducted to quantify student engagement and active attendance within similar courses. Similar styles of TBL implementation could be incorporated at other colleges of pharmacy to measure its potential benefits.

摘要

背景与目的

北美药师执照考试和药房课程成果评估是两项评估学生为进入药学实践做好准备程度的标准化考试。药学教育工作者有责任确保个体学习者参与课程材料,并采取适当步骤以成功实现学习成果。每当在先前存在的课程中采用新的教学法时,了解其对学习者的影响至关重要。

教育活动和设置

团队学习(TBL)被应用于一门新的药物发现和开发课程中,以衡量其对第二年药学学生的积极参与度和学生表现的影响。收集了调查数据,以了解药学学生对教学法变革的看法。跟踪考试能力得分和积极参与度,以衡量学生的参与度。

结果

调查结果显示,学生们一致或强烈认为,采用 TBL 模式教授药物发现和开发课程时,课程有趣、营造了有益的学习环境、并提高了他们的知识感知、沟通技巧和信心。TBL 环境下的平均出勤率>90%。在三个学术队列中,没有发现块式考试能力得分的变化。

总结

学生们一致认为,采用 TBL 教授药物发现和开发课程时有趣、营造了有益的学习环境、并提高了他们的知识感知、沟通技巧和信心。应该进行更多的研究来量化类似课程中的学生参与度和积极出勤率。可以在其他药学院采用类似的 TBL 实施方式,以衡量其潜在的益处。

相似文献

1
Drug development and the process of transitioning to team-based learning in a qualitative way.药物研发与定性向团队学习过渡的过程。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Jun;13(6):723-728. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.01.025. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Professional and pre-professional pharmacy students' perceptions of team based learning (TBL) at a private research-intensive university.私立研究型大学中专业及准专业药学专业学生对基于团队的学习(TBL)的看法。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jul;9(4):666-670. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 May 31.
3
Academic performance among pharmacy students using virtual vs. face-to-face team-based learning.药学专业学生采用虚拟与面对面团队学习的学习效果比较。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2349205. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2349205. Epub 2024 May 13.
4
Pharmacy students' perceptions and attitudes toward face-to-face vs. virtual team-based learning (TBL) in the didactic curriculum: A mixed-methods study.药学专业学生对理论课程中面对面与虚拟团队学习(TBL)的看法和态度:一项混合方法研究。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2226851. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2226851.
5
Impact of supplemental individual verbal defense on confidence, engagement, and performance in a team-based learning therapeutics course.补充个人口头辩护对团队为基础的学习治疗学课程中的信心、参与度和表现的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Feb;13(2):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
6
Team-based learning pedagogy enhances the quality of Chinese pharmacy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.团队学习教学法提高了中国药学教育的质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1724-6.
7
Perception of team-based learning using the team-based learning student assessment instrument: an exploratory analysis within pharmacy and biomedical students in the United Kingdom.使用基于团队学习的学生评估工具对基于团队学习的认知:英国药学和生物医学专业学生的探索性分析
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:23. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.23. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
8
Team-based learning-adopted strategy in pharmacy education: pharmacology and medicinal chemistry students' perceptions.药学教育中采用的基于团队的学习策略:药理学和药物化学专业学生的看法
Futur J Pharm Sci. 2023;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s43094-023-00464-6. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
9
The Effect of Pharmacy Students' Attendance on Examination Performance in Two Sequential Active-Learning Pharmacotherapy Courses.药学学生出勤率对两门连续主动学习药物治疗课程考试成绩的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):ajpe7749. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7749.
10
Student Perceptions of Team-based Learning vs Traditional Lecture-based Learning.学生对基于团队的学习与传统讲座式学习的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 May 25;79(4):51. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79451.

引用本文的文献

1
Team-based learning versus traditional teaching effect on pharmacy Students' Performance: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.基于团队的学习与传统教学对药学专业学生成绩的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Saudi Pharm J. 2024 Apr;32(4):102017. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102017. Epub 2024 Feb 27.