Valladares Liliana
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, México.
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2021;30(3):557-587. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
The paper provides a systematic theoretical analysis of the main visions of the concept of scientific literacy developed in the last 20 years. It is described as a transition from a transmissive educational vision of scientific literacy (Vision-I) to a transformative vision (Vision-III), with a stronger engagement with social participation and emancipation. Using conceptual tools from sociology and the philosophy of education, the notions of science participation and emancipation associated with transformative Vision-III are critically analyzed in order to draw attention to the growing need to define them with greater accuracy as key conceptual components of scientific literacy. Without such an approach, it will be difficult for science education to materialize and consolidate educational actions that are pedagogically sound, culturally and socially sensitive, and coherent with the social transformation of the diverse conditions of oppression. It is concluded that Vision-III should include both a broad conception of participation, which makes visible the invisible and informal acts performed by diverse groups to build society, and an alternative notion of emancipation committed to liberation.
本文对过去20年中发展起来的科学素养概念的主要观点进行了系统的理论分析。它被描述为从科学素养的传递性教育观(观点一)向变革性教育观(观点三)的转变,这种转变更加强调社会参与和解放。运用社会学和教育哲学的概念工具,对与变革性观点三相关的科学参与和解放的概念进行了批判性分析,以便提请注意越来越需要更准确地将它们定义为科学素养的关键概念组成部分。如果没有这种方法,科学教育将难以实现并巩固那些在教学上合理、在文化和社会方面敏感且与各种压迫状况下的社会变革相一致的教育行动。结论是,观点三应既包括广泛的参与概念,即让不同群体为建设社会而进行的无形和非正式行为显现出来,也包括致力于解放的解放替代概念。