Jamie Kimberly, Sharples Gary
Department of Sociology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Front Sociol. 2020 Apr 30;5:26. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00026. eCollection 2020.
While sociologists have made significant theoretical contributions to the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) debate, little attention has been given to the antimicrobial products themselves. Here we advocate a significant new direction which centers on the social and material life of antimicrobials, specifically on what they are made from and how this affects their use. This focus is timely because, in the context of declining efficacy of biomedical antibiotics, diverse materials are increasingly taking center stage in research and drug discovery as potential agents for new antimicrobial treatments. Of particular significance are natural antimicrobials, such as plants, honey and clay, whose antimicrobial potential is well-documented and which are increasingly moving into mainstream antimicrobial research. Alongside this biomedical focus, we suggest that the of these antimicrobial materials require attention to (i) highlight the ways they have been, and continue to be, used in diverse cultures globally, (ii) explore ways we might theorize these materials within wider AMR debates, and (iii) examine the impact of antimicrobials' materiality on their use by patients. This article takes the example of clay, whose antimicrobial properties are well-established and which has been used to treat wounds and gastrointestinal problems for millennia. We first locate clay as an exemplar of a wider shift toward natural products drug discovery in pharmaceutical science and antimicrobial research. We then offer a number of theoretical "ways in" for sociologists to begin making sense of clay as it comes under the western biomedical gaze. We map these conceptual lenses on to clay's physical and symbolic mobility from its use in the global south into western biomedical research and commercialization. We particularly concentrate on post-colonial theory as a means to understand clay's movement from global south to north; laboratory studies to examine its symbolic transformation to a black-boxed antimicrobial artifact; and valuation practices as a lens to capture its movement from the margins to the mainstream. We finish by reflecting on the importance of materiality in addressing optimal use of medicines and by advocating an interdisciplinary approach to AMR which positions sociology as a key contributor to AMR solutions.
虽然社会学家在抗生素耐药性(AMR)辩论中做出了重大的理论贡献,但对抗菌产品本身却很少关注。在此,我们倡导一个重要的新方向,该方向以抗菌剂的社会和物质生活为中心,特别是关注它们的构成材料以及这如何影响其使用。这一关注点很及时,因为在生物医学抗生素疗效下降的背景下,各种材料作为新抗菌治疗的潜在药物,在研究和药物发现中越来越占据中心地位。特别重要的是天然抗菌剂,如植物、蜂蜜和粘土,其抗菌潜力有充分记录,并且越来越多地进入主流抗菌研究。除了这种生物医学关注点之外,我们认为对这些抗菌材料的研究需要关注以下几点:(i)突出它们在全球不同文化中过去和现在的使用方式;(ii)探索在更广泛的AMR辩论中对这些材料进行理论化的方法;(iii)研究抗菌剂的物质性对患者使用的影响。本文以粘土为例,其抗菌特性已得到充分证实,并且数千年来一直用于治疗伤口和胃肠道问题。我们首先将粘土定位为制药科学和抗菌研究中向天然产物药物发现更广泛转变的一个范例。然后,我们为社会学家提供了一些理论“切入点”,以便在粘土进入西方生物医学视野时开始理解它。我们将这些概念视角映射到粘土从全球南方的使用到西方生物医学研究与商业化的物理和象征流动性上。我们特别关注后殖民理论,将其作为理解粘土从全球南方到北方流动的一种手段;通过实验室研究来考察其向黑箱化抗菌制品的象征转变;以及将估值实践作为一个视角来捕捉其从边缘到主流的流动。我们最后反思物质性在解决药物最佳使用方面的重要性,并倡导一种跨学科的AMR方法,将社会学定位为AMR解决方案的关键贡献者。