Eiserloh Dawson G, Foreman Jeremy J, Heintz Elizabeth C
School of Kinesiology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, United States.
Front Sociol. 2020 Jul 14;5:48. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00048. eCollection 2020.
Racial bias in sport is a prevalent research topic. Much of the previous research regarding bias among referees in sport focused on sports such as baseball, basketball, hockey, and soccer. Professional American football is unique because race is more clearly defined when compared to these other sports. Additionally, by examining holding penalties, which are known to be more subjective and called predominately by a single official on the field (i.e., the umpire), racial bias in officiating can be more efficiently analyzed in professional American football. The purpose of this study is to examine potential racial bias regarding holding penalties in the National Football League (NFL). Three years of data from the 2013 to 2014 through 2015 to 2016 NFL seasons were used, including the races of officials and players involved in holding penalties. Results showed no evidence of racial bias in the calling of holding penalties by White officials. However, Black umpires were found to call more holding penalties when led by a White referee. Additionally, Black players were more likely to have holding penalties called on them earlier in the game by all officials.
体育领域的种族偏见是一个普遍的研究课题。之前关于体育赛事中裁判偏见的许多研究都集中在棒球、篮球、曲棍球和足球等运动项目上。美国职业橄榄球独具特色,因为与其他这些运动相比,其种族定义更为明确。此外,通过研究持球犯规判罚(已知这种判罚更具主观性,且主要由场上的一名官员即裁判来判定),可以更有效地分析美国职业橄榄球裁判中的种族偏见。本研究的目的是调查美国国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)中关于持球犯规判罚的潜在种族偏见。使用了2013年至2014年到2015年至2016年NFL赛季的三年数据,包括涉及持球犯规判罚的官员和球员的种族。结果显示,白人裁判在判定持球犯规时没有种族偏见的迹象。然而,研究发现,在白人裁判的带领下,黑人裁判会做出更多的持球犯规判罚。此外,所有官员都更有可能在比赛早期对黑人球员做出持球犯规判罚。