Awinia Christopher Simeon
Centre of Economics and Community Economic Development, Open University of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Front Sociol. 2020 Nov 10;5:518797. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.518797. eCollection 2020.
Intra-African migration in sub-Saharan Africa is increasingly characterized by migration further and further south of the equator. The study focuses on the relationship between pastoralist migration and climate change, followed by loss of control of epidemics, which can lead to losses of large numbers of livestock. While increasing changes in the natural environment have been widely cited in the empirical literature, less attention has been paid to the social context and sociological factors influencing modern-day climate-induced intra-African pastoralist migration. Using Blumer's structural symbolic interaction as an analytic framework, this study examines how social and cultural perceptions influence subjective interpretations that lead to decision points that trigger intra-African pastoralist migration. Using structural symbolic interaction as an analytic framework to study interrelationships between climate-induced stimulus, symbolic interpretation, and migration response, the study identifies that decisions to migrate to other ecosystems were mediated through symbolic signs with assigned meaning and significance communicated through language, signs, symbols, ritual, and religion, which makes up the overall pastoralist cosmology of migration. That these signs and meanings, which are given symbolic meaning, form the basis of African pastoralist sociology of migration. These are the key factors that explain why some pastoralist households decide to migrate to other ecological zones while others remain in traditional pastoralist lands. This study was guided by two hypotheses. The first is that intra-African pastoralist migration is socially defined based on the social and cultural perceptions and meanings attached to interactions with their increasingly changing natural and social circumstances (H1). The second (H2) is that this meaning is defined and modified through an interpretative process in response to changing social and natural circumstances. The sample examined in the study covered seven districts with a high proportion of pastoralists across four eco-climatic zones. A total of 544 pastoralist households were interviewed. In-depth qualitative interviews and observation studies were conducted in three case-study villages. The study concludes that decisions to migrate to other ecosystems are mediated through symbolic signs with assigned meanings and significances communicated through language, signs, symbols, rituals, and religion. Together, these findings contribute to our further understanding of the sociology of recent intra-African migration.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区的非洲内部移民越来越呈现出向赤道以南地区不断迁移的特点。该研究聚焦于游牧民迁移与气候变化之间的关系,其次是疫情失控,这可能导致大量牲畜损失。虽然实证文献中广泛提及自然环境日益变化的情况,但对于影响当今气候引发的非洲内部游牧民迁移的社会背景和社会学因素关注较少。本研究以布卢默的结构符号互动为分析框架,考察社会和文化认知如何影响主观解读,这些解读会导致触发非洲内部游牧民迁移的决策点。本研究使用结构符号互动作为分析框架来研究气候引发的刺激、符号解读和迁移反应之间的相互关系,发现迁移到其他生态系统的决策是通过具有特定意义的符号来介导的,这些意义通过语言、标志、符号、仪式和宗教进行传达,它们构成了游牧民迁移的整体宇宙观。这些被赋予象征意义的符号和意义构成了非洲游牧民迁移社会学的基础。这些是解释为什么一些游牧民家庭决定迁移到其他生态区而另一些家庭仍留在传统游牧土地的关键因素。本研究受两个假设的指导。第一个假设是,非洲内部游牧民迁移是基于与日益变化的自然和社会环境互动所附着的社会和文化认知及意义而在社会层面界定的(假设1)。第二个假设(假设2)是,这种意义是通过一个解释过程来界定和修改的,以应对不断变化的社会和自然环境。本研究中所考察的样本涵盖了四个生态气候区中牧民比例较高的七个地区。总共采访了544个游牧民家庭。在三个案例研究村庄进行了深入的定性访谈和观察研究。该研究得出结论,迁移到其他生态系统的决策是通过具有特定意义的符号来介导的,这些意义通过语言、标志、符号、仪式和宗教进行传达。这些发现共同有助于我们进一步理解近期非洲内部迁移的社会学。