• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情:为何交叉性至关重要。

The Covid-19 Pandemics: why Intersectionality Matters.

作者信息

Maestripieri Lara

机构信息

Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Laboratory of Social Policies, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2021 Mar 26;6:642662. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.642662. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2021.642662
PMID:33869589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8022485/
Abstract

Covid-19 has been a disrupting event in contemporary social life but is far from being a great equaliser. Preliminary studies have put in evidence how different social groups faced a differentiated risk of contagion and coped differently with the various consequences of the emergency. Evidence shows how minorities and migrants face disproportionally higher risks of contagion than the white upper and middle class, and how vulnerable communities are more exposed to deaths and the rapid spread of the virus. At the same time, societies are coping with social distancing measures and their disruptive social and economic consequences, which have a more significant impact on the most vulnerable segments of societies: women, children, low-income classes and ethnic minorities. This article argues that an intersectional framework allows an understanding of what is occurring in the current pandemic, both in terms of its social determinants and social consequences. To open the black box of inequality, intersectional scholars analyze the intersections of multiple structures of inequalities (such as gender, age, class, ethnicity), which have a multiplying effect when disadvantaged positions intersect in the same individual. Covid-19 is a clear example of an intersectional phenomenon: the impact of individual and community exposure to Covid-19 is the results of multiple and interrelating structures of inequality. Up to now, research in social sciences has underestimated the role of intersectionality in analyzing the social and economic consequences of this pandemic.

摘要

新冠疫情是当代社会生活中的一个破坏性事件,但远非一个巨大的均衡器。初步研究已证实,不同社会群体面临着不同的感染风险,并且应对紧急情况的各种后果的方式也有所不同。证据表明,少数族裔和移民面临的感染风险比白人中上层阶级高得多,以及弱势群体更容易受到死亡和病毒快速传播的影响。与此同时,社会正在应对社交距离措施及其破坏性的社会和经济后果,这些措施对社会中最脆弱的群体:妇女、儿童、低收入阶层和少数族裔,产生了更大的影响。本文认为,一个交叉性框架有助于理解当前疫情中正在发生的事情,无论是从其社会决定因素还是社会后果方面来看。为了打开不平等的黑匣子,交叉性学者分析多种不平等结构(如性别、年龄、阶级、种族)的交叉点,当处于不利地位的情况在同一个人身上交叉时,会产生倍增效应。新冠疫情是交叉性现象的一个明显例子:个人和社区接触新冠疫情的影响是多种相互关联的不平等结构的结果。到目前为止,社会科学研究低估了交叉性在分析这场疫情的社会和经济后果中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c70/8022485/9c156817c292/fsoc-06-642662-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c70/8022485/9c156817c292/fsoc-06-642662-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c70/8022485/9c156817c292/fsoc-06-642662-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Covid-19 Pandemics: why Intersectionality Matters.新冠疫情:为何交叉性至关重要。
Front Sociol. 2021 Mar 26;6:642662. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.642662. eCollection 2021.
2
A quantitative approach to the intersectional study of mental health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic in UK young adults.新冠疫情期间英国青年心理健康不平等的交叉研究的定量方法。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Mar;59(3):417-429. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02424-0. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
3
Stigma and health inequality experienced by ethnic minorities during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Chinese community: an implication to health policymakers.在新冠疫情期间,中国社会少数民族所经历的污名化和健康不平等:对卫生政策制定者的启示。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 25;11:1184209. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1184209. eCollection 2023.
4
Intersectionality Within Critical Autism Studies: A Narrative Review.批判性自闭症研究中的交叉性:一项叙事综述。
Autism Adulthood. 2022 Dec 1;4(4):281-289. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0014. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
5
Inequality and COVID-19 in Sweden: Relative risks of nine bad life events, by four social gradients, in pandemic vs. prepandemic years.瑞典的不平等与 COVID-19:九种不良生活事件的相对风险,按四个社会梯度,在大流行年与大流行前年份。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 14;120(46):e2303640120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2303640120. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
6
Toward an Intersectional Approach to Health Justice.朝向健康正义的交叉方法。
Int J Health Serv. 2021 Apr;51(2):206-225. doi: 10.1177/0020731420981857. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
7
Methods for analytic intercategorical intersectionality in quantitative research: Discrimination as a mediator of health inequalities.定量研究中分析类别交叉性的方法:歧视作为健康不平等的中介
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:236-245. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
8
Placing intersectional inequalities in health.将交叉不平等问题纳入健康领域。
Health Place. 2022 May;75:102761. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102761. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
9
Racial and Ethnic Digital Divides in Posting COVID-19 Content on Social Media Among US Adults: Secondary Survey Analysis.美国成年人在社交媒体上发布新冠疫情相关内容时的种族和族裔数字鸿沟:二次调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 3;22(7):e20472. doi: 10.2196/20472.
10
The COVID-19 Israeli tapestry: the intersectionality health equity challenge.COVID-19 下的以色列挂毯:健康公平的交叉挑战。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2023 Apr 25;12(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13584-023-00567-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Social inequalities in SARS-CoV-2 infection in high income countries: highlighting the need for an intersectional perspective in quantitative research.高收入国家中新冠病毒感染方面的社会不平等:强调定量研究中采用交叉性视角的必要性。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 31;13:1642407. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1642407. eCollection 2025.
2
Mental health in Germany before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情之前、期间及之后德国的心理健康状况。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 3;20(1):e0313689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313689. eCollection 2025.
3
Sustained impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical student learning and well-being in rural Australia: findings from a repeated national multicentre survey.

本文引用的文献

1
The short-term economic consequences of COVID-19: Exposure to disease, remote work and government response.COVID-19 对短期经济的影响:疾病暴露、远程办公和政府应对。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0270341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270341. eCollection 2023.
2
What happens when schools shut down? Investigating inequality in students' reading behavior during Covid-19 in Denmark.学校关闭时会发生什么?调查丹麦在新冠疫情期间学生阅读行为中的不平等现象。
Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2021 Feb;71:100568. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100568. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
Determinants of Disparities in Early COVID-19 Job Losses.
COVID-19 大流行对澳大利亚农村地区医学生学习和健康的持续影响:来自一项重复全国多中心调查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 28;14(11):e086359. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086359.
4
Public-engagement strategies of the South Asian COVID-19 Task Force: The role of racialized healthcare workers in COVID-19 mitigation in Ontario.南亚新冠疫情特别工作组的公众参与策略:种族化医护人员在安大略省新冠疫情缓解中的作用。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;4(10):e0003729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003729. eCollection 2024.
5
Journalists in a circular economy: Stakeholders' engagement in the media discourse on single-use plastics during the COVID-19 pandemic.循环经济中的记者:新冠疫情期间利益相关者对一次性塑料媒体话语的参与情况
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 17;10(16):e36299. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36299. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
6
Faith and vaccination: a scoping review of the relationships between religious beliefs and vaccine hesitancy.信仰与疫苗接种:宗教信仰与疫苗犹豫之间关系的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 6;24(1):1806. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18873-4.
7
Racial-Ethnic Gaps in Pandemic-Related Economic Hardship: Age Differences Among Older Adults.疫情相关经济困难中的种族-族裔差距:老年人的年龄差异
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Aug 1;79(8). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae099.
8
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on college students with marginalized identities.新冠疫情对具有边缘化身份的大学生的影响。
Equity Educ Soc. 2023 Apr;2(1):78-93. doi: 10.1177/27526461221149035. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
9
Prioritizing Equity in Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts (EASE): a framework for infectious diseases clinicians.抗菌药物管理工作中优先考虑公平性(EASE):传染病临床医生的框架
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 May 3;4(1):e74. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.69. eCollection 2024.
10
Identifying disparities in mental illness and well-being across no-risk, risk, and intersectional groups during the Covid-19 pandemic and the role of sociodemographics in mental health outcomes.识别新冠疫情期间无风险、有风险和交叉群体在精神疾病和幸福感方面的差异,以及社会人口统计学因素在心理健康结果中的作用。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2024;46:e20233532. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3532. Epub 2024 May 2.
早期新冠疫情导致失业差异的决定因素。
Demography. 2022 Jun 1;59(3):827-855. doi: 10.1215/00703370-9961471.
4
Unequal and Invisible: A Feminist Political Economy Approach to Valuing Women's Care Labor in the COVID-19 Response.不平等与无形:一种女性主义政治经济学方法,用于评估新冠疫情应对中女性护理劳动的价值。
Front Sociol. 2020 Nov 6;5:588279. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.588279. eCollection 2020.
5
Covid-19 as a Social Crisis and Justice Challenge for Cities.新冠疫情:城市面临的社会危机与正义挑战
Front Sociol. 2020 Nov 12;5:583638. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.583638. eCollection 2020.
6
Covid-19 Requires a Social Medicine Response.新冠疫情需要社会医学应对措施。
Front Sociol. 2020 Oct 26;5:579991. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.579991. eCollection 2020.
7
COVID-19 Pandemic: Socio-Economic Consequences of Social Distancing Measures in Italy.新冠疫情:意大利社交距离措施的社会经济后果
Front Sociol. 2020 Oct 16;5:575791. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.575791. eCollection 2020.
8
Sociology, Social Class, Health Inequalities, and the Avoidance of "Classism".社会学、社会阶层、健康不平等与“阶层歧视”的规避
Front Sociol. 2019 Jul 5;4:56. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00056. eCollection 2019.
9
COVID-19 and the immediate impact on young people and employment in Australia: A gendered analysis.新冠疫情及其对澳大利亚年轻人和就业的直接影响:性别分析
Gend Work Organ. 2021 Mar;28(2):783-794. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12563. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
10
Assessing the Impact of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Characteristics on COVID-19 Prevalence Across Seven States in the United States.评估美国七个州邻里社会经济特征对新冠病毒病流行率的影响。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 22;8:571808. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.571808. eCollection 2020.