• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用定量D-二聚体确定COVID-19患者是否需要进行肺部CT血管造影

Using Quantitative D-Dimer to Determine the Need for Pulmonary CT Angiography in COVID-19 Patients.

作者信息

Mikhjian Gary, Elghoroury Ahmad, Cronovich Keith, Brody Kevin, Jarski Robert

机构信息

Henry Ford Macomb.

Henry Ford.

出版信息

Spartan Med Res J. 2021 Apr 13;6(1):18652. doi: 10.51894/001c.18652.

DOI:10.51894/001c.18652
PMID:33870000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8043904/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 has been frequently cited as a condition causing a pro-inflammatory state leading to hypercoagulopathy and increased risk for venous thromboembolism. This condition has thus prompted prior studies and screening models that utilize D-dimer for pulmonary embolism (PE) into question. The limited research to date has failed to provide tools or guidance regarding what COVID-19 positive patients should receive pulmonary CT angiography screening. This knowledge gap has led to missed diagnoses, CT overutilization, and increased morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the quantitative D-dimer lab marker in a convenience sample of 426 COVID-19 positive patients to assist providers in determining the utility of pulmonary CT angiography.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis on all COVID-19 positive patients within the Henry Ford Medical System between March 1st, 2020 through April 30th, 2020 who received pulmonary CT angiography and had a quantitative D-dimer lab drawn within 24 hours of CT imaging.

RESULTS

Our sampling criteria yielded a total of n = 426 patients, of whom 347 (81.5%) were negative for PE and 79 (18.5%) were positive for PE. The average D-dimer in the negative PE group was 2.95 μg./mL. (SD 4.26), significantly different than the 9.15 μg./mL. (SD 6.80) positive PE group (P < 0.05; 95% CI -7.8, -4.6). Theoretically, applying the traditional ≤ 0.5 μg./mL. D-dimer cut-off to our data would yield a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 7.49% for exclusion of PE. Based on these results, the authors would be able to increase the D-dimer threshold to < 0.89 μg./mL. to maintain their sensitivity to 100% and raise the specificity to 27.95%. Observing a D-dimer cut-off value of ≤ 1.28 μg./mL. would reduce sensitivity to 97.47% but increase the specificity to 57.93%.

CONCLUSIONS

These study results support the utilization of alternative D-dimer thresholds to exclude PE in COVID-19 patients. Based on these findings, providers may be able to observe increased D-dimer cut-off values to reduce unnecessary pulmonary CT angiography scans.

摘要

引言

新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)常被认为是一种可导致促炎状态,进而引发高凝血症并增加静脉血栓栓塞风险的疾病。这种情况使得先前利用D-二聚体检测肺栓塞(PE)的研究和筛查模型受到质疑。迄今为止,有限的研究未能提供关于COVID-19阳性患者应接受肺部CT血管造影筛查的工具或指导。这种知识空白导致了漏诊、CT过度使用以及发病率和死亡率的增加。

目的

本研究旨在探讨定量D-二聚体实验室指标在426例COVID-19阳性患者的便利样本中的效用,以帮助医疗人员确定肺部CT血管造影的效用。

方法

作者对亨利福特医疗系统内2020年3月1日至2020年4月30日期间接受肺部CT血管造影且在CT成像后24小时内进行定量D-二聚体检测的所有COVID-19阳性患者进行了回顾性分析。

结果

我们的抽样标准共纳入了n = 426例患者,其中347例(81.5%)PE检测为阴性,79例(18.5%)PE检测为阳性。PE阴性组的平均D-二聚体为2.95μg/mL(标准差4.26),与PE阳性组的9.15μg/mL(标准差6.80)有显著差异(P < 0.05;95%置信区间 -7.8,-4.6)。理论上,将传统的≤0.5μg/mL的D-二聚体临界值应用于我们的数据,排除PE的敏感性为100%,特异性为7.49%。基于这些结果,作者能够将D-二聚体阈值提高到<0.89μg/mL,以保持敏感性为100%,并将特异性提高到27.95%。观察到D-二聚体临界值≤1.28μg/mL将使敏感性降至97.47%,但特异性提高到57.93%。

结论

这些研究结果支持采用替代的D-二聚体阈值来排除COVID-19患者的PE。基于这些发现,医疗人员或许能够提高D-二聚体临界值,以减少不必要的肺部CT血管造影扫描。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a50/8043904/803205531723/smrj_2021_6_1_18652_49242.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a50/8043904/46d5b52b2aaf/smrj_2021_6_1_18652_49060.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a50/8043904/803205531723/smrj_2021_6_1_18652_49242.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a50/8043904/46d5b52b2aaf/smrj_2021_6_1_18652_49060.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a50/8043904/803205531723/smrj_2021_6_1_18652_49242.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Quantitative D-Dimer to Determine the Need for Pulmonary CT Angiography in COVID-19 Patients.使用定量D-二聚体确定COVID-19患者是否需要进行肺部CT血管造影
Spartan Med Res J. 2021 Apr 13;6(1):18652. doi: 10.51894/001c.18652.
2
What level of D-dimers can safely exclude pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department?在因 COVID-19 而到急诊科就诊的患者中,D-二聚体达到什么水平可以安全排除肺栓塞?
Eur Radiol. 2022 Apr;32(4):2704-2712. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08377-9. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Clinical usefulness of adjusted D-dimer cut-off values to exclude pulmonary embolism in a community hospital emergency department patient population.调整后的D-二聚体临界值在社区医院急诊科患者人群中排除肺栓塞的临床实用性。
Acta Radiol. 2012 Sep 1;53(7):765-8. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120105. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
4
Yield of CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Emergency Department When Providers Override Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support.当医疗人员推翻基于证据的临床决策支持时,急诊科CT肺动脉造影的诊断率
Radiology. 2017 Mar;282(3):717-725. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151985. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
5
Pulmonary Embolism at CT Pulmonary Angiography in Patients with COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者CT肺动脉造影中的肺栓塞
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020 Jul 2;2(4):e200308. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020200308. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Predictive value of D-dimer and analysis of risk factors in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism after cesarean section.剖宫产术后疑似肺栓塞孕妇 D-二聚体的预测价值及危险因素分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Dec 1;21(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01757-3.
7
Recommended D-Dimer Use in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Is Insufficient to Curb the Long-Term Overutilization of CT Pulmonary Angiography.推荐在疑似肺栓塞中使用 D-二聚体,但仍不足以遏制 CT 肺动脉造影的长期过度使用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Nov;18(11):1517-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.06.021. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
8
D-dimer levels to exclude pulmonary embolism and reduce the need for CT angiography in COVID-19 in an outpatient population.D-二聚体水平可排除肺栓塞并减少 COVID-19 门诊患者 CT 血管造影的需求。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 17;19(1):e0297023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297023. eCollection 2024.
9
CT imaging of pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a retrospective analysis.COVID-19 肺炎患者肺栓塞的 CT 影像学表现:一项回顾性分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):1915-1922. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07300-y. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
10
A critical appraisal of non-invasive diagnosis and exclusion of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: how many tests do we need?对疑似深静脉血栓形成或肺栓塞的门诊患者进行深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞的非侵入性诊断及排除的批判性评估:我们需要多少项检查?
Int Angiol. 2005 Mar;24(1):27-39.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving risk prediction for pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients using echocardiography.使用超声心动图改善COVID-19患者肺栓塞的风险预测。
Pulm Circ. 2022 Mar 8;12(1):e12036. doi: 10.1002/pul2.12036. eCollection 2022 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure.基于时间的暴露后,逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测 SARS-CoV-2 的假阴性率的变化。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Aug 18;173(4):262-267. doi: 10.7326/M20-1495. Epub 2020 May 13.
2
Acute Pulmonary Embolism and COVID-19.急性肺栓塞与 COVID-19。
Radiology. 2020 Dec;297(3):E335-E338. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201955. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
Comparison of Commercially Available and Laboratory-Developed Assays for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Laboratories.
临床实验室中用于检测新型冠状病毒2的商用检测方法与实验室自行开发检测方法的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00821-20.
4
COVID-19 and Thrombotic or Thromboembolic Disease: Implications for Prevention, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Follow-Up: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.新型冠状病毒肺炎与血栓栓塞性疾病:预防、抗栓治疗与随访的相关问题:美国心脏病学会临床实践更新。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 16;75(23):2950-2973. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.031. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
5
Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19.COVID-19 重症监护病房危重症患者的血栓并发症发生率。
Thromb Res. 2020 Jul;191:145-147. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
6
Comparative Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Assays Using Seven Different Primer-Probe Sets and One Assay Kit.七种不同引物探针组合和一种检测试剂盒检测 SARS-CoV-2 的比较性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00557-20.
7
Quantitative Detection and Viral Load Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in Infected Patients.新型冠状病毒感染患者的病毒定量检测与载量分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):793-798. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa345.
8
Epidemiology of Covid-19 in a Long-Term Care Facility in King County, Washington.华盛顿州金县长期护理机构中 COVID-19 的流行病学。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2005-2011. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005412. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
9
Profiling Early Humoral Response to Diagnose Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19).分析早期体液免疫反应以诊断新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):778-785. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa310.
10
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.中国武汉成人 COVID-19 住院患者的临床病程和死亡危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. Epub 2020 Mar 11.