• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理学研究中研究方法的运用:一项系统综述

The Use of Research Methods in Psychological Research: A Systematised Review.

作者信息

Scholtz Salomé Elizabeth, de Klerk Werner, de Beer Leon T

机构信息

Community Psychosocial Research (COMPRES), School of Psychosocial Health, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

WorkWell Research Institute, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

出版信息

Front Res Metr Anal. 2020 Mar 20;5:1. doi: 10.3389/frma.2020.00001. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/frma.2020.00001
PMID:33870039
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8028395/
Abstract

Research methods play an imperative role in research quality as well as educating young researchers, however, the application thereof is unclear which can be detrimental to the field of psychology. Therefore, this systematised review aimed to determine what research methods are being used, how these methods are being used and for what topics in the field. Our review of 999 articles from five journals over a period of 5 years indicated that psychology research is conducted in 10 topics via predominantly quantitative research methods. Of these 10 topics, social psychology was the most popular. The remainder of the conducted methodology is described. It was also found that articles lacked rigour and transparency in the used methodology which has implications for replicability. In conclusion this article, provides an overview of all reported methodologies used in a sample of psychology journals. It highlights the popularity and application of methods and designs throughout the article sample as well as an unexpected lack of rigour with regard to most aspects of methodology. Possible sample bias should be considered when interpreting the results of this study. It is recommended that future research should utilise the results of this study to determine the possible impact on the field of psychology as a science and to further investigation into the use of research methods. Results should prompt the following future research into: a lack or rigour and its implication on replication, the use of certain methods above others, publication bias and choice of sampling method.

摘要

研究方法在研究质量以及培养年轻研究人员方面起着至关重要的作用,然而,其应用尚不清楚,这可能会对心理学领域造成损害。因此,本系统综述旨在确定正在使用哪些研究方法、这些方法是如何使用的以及用于该领域的哪些主题。我们对五本期刊在五年内发表的999篇文章进行的综述表明,心理学研究主要通过定量研究方法在10个主题中进行。在这10个主题中,社会心理学最受欢迎。其余所采用的方法也进行了描述。还发现文章在所使用的方法上缺乏严谨性和透明度,这对可重复性有影响。总之,本文概述了心理学期刊样本中所报告的所有方法。它突出了文章样本中方法和设计的受欢迎程度及应用情况,以及在方法学的大多数方面意外缺乏严谨性的情况。在解释本研究结果时应考虑可能的样本偏差。建议未来的研究应利用本研究结果来确定对作为一门科学的心理学领域可能产生的影响,并进一步调查研究方法的使用情况。研究结果应促使未来进行以下研究:缺乏严谨性及其对重复性的影响、某些方法相对于其他方法的使用、发表偏倚以及抽样方法的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/9583306f4202/frma-05-00001-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/45ac38ec2309/frma-05-00001-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/0832c521f532/frma-05-00001-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/249892514736/frma-05-00001-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/d3ea4690b304/frma-05-00001-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/70f468831f69/frma-05-00001-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/fc1dffb0616e/frma-05-00001-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/9583306f4202/frma-05-00001-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/45ac38ec2309/frma-05-00001-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/0832c521f532/frma-05-00001-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/249892514736/frma-05-00001-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/d3ea4690b304/frma-05-00001-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/70f468831f69/frma-05-00001-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/fc1dffb0616e/frma-05-00001-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e991/8028395/9583306f4202/frma-05-00001-g0007.jpg

相似文献

1
The Use of Research Methods in Psychological Research: A Systematised Review.心理学研究中研究方法的运用:一项系统综述
Front Res Metr Anal. 2020 Mar 20;5:1. doi: 10.3389/frma.2020.00001. eCollection 2020.
2
Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.期刊中热门话题的影响因素及预测
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):343-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111209. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
3
Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?心理学研究中的复制:它们真的经常发生吗?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):537-42. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460688.
4
Personality psychology: research trends for 1993-1995.人格心理学:1993 - 1995年的研究趋势
J Pers. 1998 Oct;66(5):621-69. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00027.
5
Analysis and prospect of clinical psychology based on topic models: hot research topics and scientific trends in the latest decades.基于主题模型的临床心理学分析与展望:近几十年来的热门研究课题和科学趋势。
Psychol Health Med. 2021 Apr;26(4):395-407. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1738019. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
6
Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field.体育与运动科学中的重复研究问题:对该领域若干选定方法学问题的叙述性综述
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Dec 14;9(12):220946. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220946. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development.在定性研究数据的主题分析中尝试严谨性和可重复性;以代码本开发为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 28;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0707-y.
8
Low Hopes, High Expectations: Expectancy Effects and the Replicability of Behavioral Experiments.低期望,高期待:期望效应与行为实验的可复制性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):572-84. doi: 10.1177/1745691612463704.
9
Promoting psychology to students: embracing the multiplicity of research foci and method.向学生推广心理学:拥抱研究焦点和方法的多样性。
Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 21;4:774. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00774. eCollection 2013.
10
The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review.工业与组织心理学中系统评价和元分析的报告质量:一项系统评价
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 22;8:1395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01395. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation and Implementation of a Multi-Family Group Psychoeducational Intervention for Parents of Children with Autism: A Pilot Study.针对自闭症儿童家长的多家庭团体心理教育干预的适应性与实施:一项试点研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 28;14(7):2307. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072307.
2
Addressing the criticisms and critiques of positive psychology: recommendations for improving the science and practice of the field.应对对积极心理学的批评与评论:改进该领域科学与实践的建议。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 26;16:1548612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1548612. eCollection 2025.
3
In models we trust: preregistration, large samples, and replication may not suffice.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines: a methodological guide.临床实践指南的系统评价:方法学指南。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;108:64-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.030. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
2
Raising Awareness for the Replication Crisis in Clinical Psychology by Focusing on Inconsistencies in Psychotherapy Research: How Much Can We Rely on Published Findings from Efficacy Trials?通过关注心理治疗研究中的不一致性提高对临床心理学复制危机的认识:我们能在多大程度上依赖疗效试验的已发表结果?
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 28;9:256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00256. eCollection 2018.
3
Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.
我们相信模型:预注册、大样本和复制可能并不够。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 21;14:1266447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1266447. eCollection 2023.
心理学定量研究期刊文章报告标准:APA 出版与传播委员会工作组报告。
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):3-25. doi: 10.1037/amp0000191.
4
Is Psychology Headed in the Right Direction? Yes, No, and Maybe.心理学是否朝着正确的方向发展?是,否,也许。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul;12(4):656-659. doi: 10.1177/1745691616687747.
5
Reporting Practices and Use of Quantitative Methods in Canadian Journal Articles in Psychology.加拿大心理学领域期刊文章中的报告实践与定量方法的使用
Can Psychol. 2017 May;58(2):140-147. doi: 10.1037/cap0000074. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
6
Evidence-based information needs of public health workers: a systematized review.公共卫生工作者基于证据的信息需求:一项系统评价
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jan;105(1):69-79. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.109.
7
The Future of Qualitative Research in Psychology: Accentuating the Positive.心理学质性研究的未来:强调积极面
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Jun;50(2):234-43. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9320-8.
8
Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology.复制、证伪与社会心理学中的信任危机。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 19;6:621. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621. eCollection 2015.
9
New directions in qualitative research in psychology.心理学质性研究的新方向。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2015 Jun;49(2):125-33. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9303-9.
10
Social networks and female reproductive choices in the developing world: a systematized review.发展中世界的社交网络与女性生殖选择:一项系统综述
Reprod Health. 2014 Dec 10;11:85. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-85.