• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎磁共振成像报告的可读性:患者能理解吗?

Readability of Lumbar Spine MRI Reports: Will Patients Understand?

机构信息

1 Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD 21287.

2 University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, WI.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Mar;212(3):602-606. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20197. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.18.20197
PMID:30620671
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Radiology reports have traditionally been written for referring clinical providers. However, as patients increasingly access their radiology reports through online medical records, concerns have been raised about their ability to comprehend these complex documents. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability of lumbar spine MRI reports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 110 lumbar spine MRI reports dictated by 11 fellowship-trained radiologists (eight musculoskeletal radiologists and three neuroradiologists) at a single academic medical center. We evaluated each article for readability using five quantitative readability tests: the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook. The number of reports with readability at or below eighth-grade level (average reading ability of U.S. adults) and at or below sixth-grade level (level recommended by the National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association for patient education materials) were determined.

RESULTS

The mean readability grade level of the lumbar spine MRI reports was greater than the 12th-grade reading level for all readability scales. Only one report was written at or below eighth-grade level; no reports were written at or below sixth-grade level.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar spine MRI reports are written at a level too high for the average patient to comprehend. As patients increasingly read their radiology reports through online portals, consideration should be made of patients' ability to read and comprehend these complex medical documents.

摘要

目的

放射学报告传统上是为转诊临床医生编写的。然而,随着患者越来越多地通过在线病历查阅放射学报告,人们对他们理解这些复杂文件的能力提出了担忧。本研究的目的是评估腰椎磁共振成像报告的可读性。

材料与方法

我们回顾了一家学术医疗中心的 11 名经过 fellowship培训的放射科医生(8 名肌肉骨骼放射科医生和 3 名神经放射科医生)口述的 110 份腰椎磁共振成像报告。我们使用五种定量可读性测试来评估每篇文章的可读性:Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平、Flesch 阅读舒适度、Gunning Fog 指数、Coleman-Liau 指数和简单测量乱语指数。确定可读性达到或低于八年级(美国成年人的平均阅读能力)和达到或低于六年级(美国国立卫生研究院和美国医学协会推荐的患者教育材料的水平)的报告数量。

结果

所有可读性量表的腰椎磁共振成像报告平均可读性年级水平均高于 12 年级阅读水平。只有一份报告的可读性达到或低于八年级;没有报告的可读性达到或低于六年级。

结论

腰椎磁共振成像报告的编写水平对于普通患者来说太高,难以理解。随着患者越来越多地通过在线门户阅读他们的放射学报告,应该考虑患者阅读和理解这些复杂医学文件的能力。

相似文献

1
Readability of Lumbar Spine MRI Reports: Will Patients Understand?腰椎磁共振成像报告的可读性:患者能理解吗?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Mar;212(3):602-606. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20197. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
3
The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.美国矫形外科医师学会患者教育材料的可读性:评估自2008年以来的进展
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):e70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00658.
4
Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.评估三叉神经痛在线患者教育材料的可读性。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e934-e938. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.123. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Readability of online patient education materials for shoulder instability surgery in English and Spanish.英文和西班牙文的肩部不稳定手术在线患者教育材料的可读性
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Oct;33(10):2220-2229. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.028. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
6
Hand Surgery Resources Exceed American Health Literacy.手部外科资源超出美国健康素养水平。
Hand (N Y). 2018 Sep;13(5):547-551. doi: 10.1177/1558944717725384. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
7
Readability of Patient Education Materials From RadiologyInfo.org: Has There Been Progress Over the Past 5 Years?从 RadiologyInfo.org 看患者教育材料的易读性:过去 5 年是否有所进步?
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Oct;213(4):875-879. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.21047. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
8
Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Surgical Treatments of the Spine.在线最常访问的与脊柱手术治疗相关的患者教育材料的易读性。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e583-e588. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
9
Readability of Online Hand Surgery Patient Educational Materials: Evaluating the Trend Since 2008.在线手部手术患者教育材料的可读性:评估自2008年以来的趋势
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Feb;47(2):186.e1-186.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.03.025. Epub 2021 May 20.
10
A critical review of the readability of online patient education resources from RadiologyInfo.Org.放射学信息网(RadiologyInfo.Org)在线患者教育资源的可读性评价综述
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):566-75. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11223.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Quality and Understandability of Radiology Report Summaries Generated by ChatGPT: Survey Study.评估ChatGPT生成的放射学报告摘要的质量和可理解性:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 27;9:e76097. doi: 10.2196/76097.
2
Enhancing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Report Comprehension in Spinal Trauma: Readability Analysis of AI-Generated Explanations for Thoracolumbar Fractures.提高脊柱创伤磁共振成像(MRI)报告的理解:胸腰椎骨折人工智能生成解释的可读性分析
JMIR AI. 2025 Jul 1;4:e69654. doi: 10.2196/69654.
3
Evaluating musculoskeletal imaging communication interventions using behavioural science: a scoping review using the COM-B model.
运用行为科学评估肌肉骨骼影像学沟通干预措施:一项采用COM-B模型的范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 9;15(4):e085807. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085807.
4
Patient-centered radiology reports with generative artificial intelligence: adding value to radiology reporting.基于生成式人工智能的以患者为中心的放射科报告:为放射科报告增添价值。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 8;14(1):13218. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63824-z.
5
Evaluating the Use of ChatGPT to Accurately Simplify Patient-centered Information about Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening.评估使用 ChatGPT 准确简化有关乳腺癌预防和筛查的以患者为中心的信息。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Mar;6(2):e230086. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230086.
6
ChatGPT makes medicine easy to swallow: an exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports.ChatGPT 让医学文献通俗易懂:简化放射学报告的探索性案例研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):2817-2825. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10213-1. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
7
Patient experience of imaging reports: A systematic literature review.患者对影像报告的体验:一项系统的文献综述。
Ultrasound. 2023 Aug;31(3):164-175. doi: 10.1177/1742271X221140024. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
8
Low Back Pain Patients' Perceptions Regarding Their Own Radiology Reports: Pre-Intervention Survey.腰痛患者对自身放射学报告的认知:干预前调查
J Pain Res. 2023 Mar 17;16:933-941. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S396844. eCollection 2023.
9
What radiologists need to know about patients' expectations: P.A.T.I.E.N.T.S C.A.R.E.R.S A.I.M.S.放射科医生需要了解患者期望的内容:患者、护理人员、目标
Insights Imaging. 2022 Mar 22;13(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01184-w.
10
21 Century Cures Act, an Information Technology-Led Organizational Initiative.《21世纪治愈法案》,一项以信息技术为主导的组织倡议。
HSS J. 2022 Feb;18(1):42-47. doi: 10.1177/15563316211041613. Epub 2021 Sep 29.