• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国国民保健制度 Saving Babies' Lives 护理包在英格兰产科单位的实施效果、服务结果和成本:队列研究。

Stillbirth rates, service outcomes and costs of implementing NHS England's Saving Babies' Lives care bundle in maternity units in England: A cohort study.

机构信息

Faculty of Biological, Medical and Health, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 19;16(4):e0250150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250150. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0250150
PMID:33872334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8055032/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess implementation of the Saving Babies Lives (SBL) Care Bundle, a collection of practice recommendations in four key areas, to reduce stillbirth in England.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of 463,630 births in 19 NHS Trusts in England using routinely collected electronic data supplemented with case note audit (n = 1,658), and surveys of service users (n = 2,085) and health care professionals (n = 1,064). The primary outcome was stillbirth rate. Outcome rates two years before and after the nominal SBL implementation date were derived as a measure of change over the implementation period. Data were collected on secondary outcomes and process outcomes which reflected implementation of the SBL care bundle.

RESULTS

The total stillbirth rate, declined from 4.2 to 3.4 per 1,000 births between the two time points (adjusted Relative Risk (aRR) 0.80, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 0.70 to 0.91, P<0.001). There was a contemporaneous increase in induction of labour (aRR 1.20 (95%CI 1.18-1.21), p<0.001) and emergency Caesarean section (aRR 1.10 (95%CI 1.07-1.12), p<0.001). The number of ultrasound scans performed (aRR 1.25 (95%CI 1.21-1.28), p<0.001) and the proportion of small for gestational age infants detected (aRR 1.59 (95%CI 1.32-1.92), p<0.001) also increased. Organisations reporting higher levels of implementation had improvements in process measures in all elements of the care bundle. An economic analysis estimated the cost of implementing the care bundle at ~£140 per birth. However, neither the costs nor changes in outcomes could be definitively attributed to implementation of the SBL care bundle.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the SBL care bundle increased over time in the majority of sites. Implementation was associated with improvements in process outcomes. The reduction in stillbirth rates in participating sites exceeded that reported nationally in the same timeframe. The intervention should be refined to identify women who are most likely to benefit and minimise unwarranted intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on (NCT03231007); www.clinicaltrials.gov.

摘要

目的

评估 Saving Babies Lives(SBL)护理包的实施情况,该护理包包含四个关键领域的实践建议,旨在减少英格兰的死产。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了英格兰 19 家 NHS 信托机构的 463630 例分娩,使用常规收集的电子数据进行补充,并进行了病例记录审核(n=1658)、服务使用者调查(n=2085)和卫生保健专业人员调查(n=1064)。主要结局是死产率。在名义 SBL 实施日期前后两年的结局率被作为实施期间变化的衡量标准。收集了反映 SBL 护理包实施的次要结局和过程结局的数据。

结果

总死产率从两个时间点的每 1000 例活产 4.2 例降至 3.4 例(调整后的相对风险(aRR)0.80,95%置信区间(95%CI)0.70 至 0.91,P<0.001)。同期,引产(aRR 1.20(95%CI 1.18-1.21),p<0.001)和紧急剖宫产(aRR 1.10(95%CI 1.07-1.12),p<0.001)的比例增加。进行的超声检查次数(aRR 1.25(95%CI 1.21-1.28),p<0.001)和检测到的小于胎龄儿比例(aRR 1.59(95%CI 1.32-1.92),p<0.001)也有所增加。报告实施水平较高的组织在护理包所有元素的过程措施方面均有改善。一项经济分析估计,实施护理包的成本约为每例分娩 140 英镑。然而,成本的变化以及结果的变化都不能明确归因于 SBL 护理包的实施。

结论

SBL 护理包的实施在大多数地点随着时间的推移而增加。实施与过程结局的改善相关。参与地点的死产率下降幅度超过了同期全国报告的水平。该干预措施应加以改进,以确定最有可能受益的妇女,并尽量减少不必要的干预。

试验注册

该研究于(NCT03231007)注册;www.clinicaltrials.gov。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c762/8055032/38c4b7ca5b1b/pone.0250150.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c762/8055032/38c4b7ca5b1b/pone.0250150.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c762/8055032/38c4b7ca5b1b/pone.0250150.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Stillbirth rates, service outcomes and costs of implementing NHS England's Saving Babies' Lives care bundle in maternity units in England: A cohort study.英国国民保健制度 Saving Babies' Lives 护理包在英格兰产科单位的实施效果、服务结果和成本:队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 19;16(4):e0250150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250150. eCollection 2021.
2
Saving babies' lives project impact and results evaluation (SPiRE): a mixed methodology study.拯救婴儿生命项目的影响和结果评估(SPiRE):一项混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1672-x.
3
Outcomes of Pregnancies for Women Undergoing Endoscopy While They Were Pregnant: A Nationwide Cohort Study.怀孕期间行内镜检查的女性妊娠结局:一项全国性队列研究。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Feb;152(3):554-563.e9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
4
Assessment of the quality, content and perceived utility of local maternity guidelines in hospitals in England implementing the saving babies' lives care bundle to reduce stillbirth.评估英格兰实施挽救婴儿生命护理包以减少死产的医院中当地产妇指南的质量、内容和感知实用性。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Apr;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000756.
5
Obstetric consequences of subfertility: a retrospective cohort study.不孕的产科结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2016 Jul;123(8):1320-8. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13584. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
6
Implementation and evaluation of a quality improvement initiative to reduce late gestation stillbirths in Australia: Safer Baby Bundle study protocol.实施和评估一项质量改进计划,以减少澳大利亚晚期妊娠死胎:更安全的婴儿包研究方案。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 13;20(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03401-0.
7
Reduction of stillbirths in England from 2008 to 2017 according to uptake of the Growth Assessment Protocol: 10-year population-based cohort study.根据《生长评估方案》的采用情况,英格兰 2008 年至 2017 年的死产率降低:10 年基于人群的队列研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;57(3):401-408. doi: 10.1002/uog.22187.
8
Annual distribution of births and deaths outcomes at Harare Maternity Hospital, Zimbabwe.津巴布韦哈拉雷妇产医院出生与死亡结果的年度分布情况。
Cent Afr J Med. 2010 May-Aug;56(5-8):30-41.
9
Evaluation of Pregnancy Outcomes Among Women With Decreased Fetal Movements.胎动减少孕妇的妊娠结局评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215071. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5071.
10
Saving babies' lives (SBL) - a programme to reduce neonatal mortality in rural Cambodia: study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.拯救婴儿生命(SBL)- 一个降低柬埔寨农村地区新生儿死亡率的项目:一项基于阶梯式楔形的群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Sep 7;21(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02833-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the implementation of the Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 from service user and healthcare professionals' perspectives: a questionnaire study.从服务使用者和医疗保健专业人员的角度评估《拯救婴儿生命护理包第2版》的实施情况:一项问卷调查研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Sep 2;14(3):e003456. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003456.
2
Safer Baby Bundle intervention for reducing perinatal mortality in Ethiopia: a quasi-experimental study.用于降低埃塞俄比亚围产期死亡率的更安全婴儿综合干预措施:一项准实验研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Aug 5;9(1):e003502. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003502.
3
Impact of a dedicated antenatal specialist service for women with a history of stillbirth: the rainbow clinic.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of the quality, content and perceived utility of local maternity guidelines in hospitals in England implementing the saving babies' lives care bundle to reduce stillbirth.评估英格兰实施挽救婴儿生命护理包以减少死产的医院中当地产妇指南的质量、内容和感知实用性。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Apr;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000756.
2
The DESiGN trial (DEtection of Small for Gestational age Neonate), evaluating the effect of the Growth Assessment Protocol (GAP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.DESiGN试验(小于胎龄新生儿检测),评估生长评估方案(GAP)的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Mar 4;20(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3242-6.
3
为有死产史的女性提供的专门产前专科服务的影响:彩虹诊所
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 19;25(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07421-6.
4
Your period and your pregnancy, a cohort study of pregnant patients investigating the associations between menstruation and birth outcomes in Australia: study protocol.你的经期与妊娠:一项对澳大利亚孕妇进行的队列研究,旨在探究月经与分娩结局之间的关联:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):e091813. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091813.
5
Experiences of antenatal care practices to reduce stillbirth: surveys of women and healthcare professionals pre-post implementation of the Safer Baby Bundle.减少死产的产前护理实践经验:在实施更安全的婴儿包前后对妇女和医疗保健专业人员的调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Aug 1;24(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06712-8.
6
Evaluating patient experience to improve care in a specialist antenatal clinic for pregnancy after loss.评估患者体验,以改善妊娠丢失专科产前门诊的护理。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 10;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06217-w.
7
Quality and reporting of large-scale improvement programmes: a review of maternity initiatives in the English NHS, 2010-2023.大规模改进计划的质量和报告:对 2010-2023 年英国国民保健制度中产科举措的审查。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Oct 18;33(11):704-715. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016606.
8
Safer Baby Bundle: study protocol for the economic evaluation of a quality improvement initiative to reduce stillbirths.更安全的婴儿包:一项降低死产率的质量改进计划的经济评价研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e058988. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058988.
9
The Tommy's Clinical Decision Tool, a device for reducing the clinical impact of placental dysfunction and preterm birth: protocol for a mixed-methods early implementation evaluation study.汤米临床决策工具,一种减少胎盘功能障碍和早产临床影响的装置:混合方法早期实施评估研究方案。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Aug 15;22(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04867-w.
10
Quality framework for remote antenatal care: qualitative study with women, healthcare professionals and system-level stakeholders.远程产前护理质量框架:对女性、医疗保健专业人员和系统层面利益相关者的定性研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Apr 24;33(5):301-313. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014329.
How to be a very safe maternity unit: An ethnographic study.
如何成为一个非常安全的产科病房:一项民族志研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;223:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.035. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
4
Persistent inaccuracies in completion of medical certificates of stillbirth: A cross-sectional study.死产医学证明填写中的持续不准确情况:一项横断面研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;32(5):474-481. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12501. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
5
Awareness of fetal movements and care package to reduce fetal mortality (AFFIRM): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial.胎儿运动感知和护理包以降低胎儿死亡率(AFFIRM):一项阶梯式楔形、整群随机试验。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 3;392(10158):1629-1638. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31543-5. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
6
Linkage of Maternity Hospital Episode Statistics data to birth registration and notification records for births in England 2005-2014: Quality assurance of linkage of routine data for singleton and multiple births.2005 - 2014年英格兰地区妇产医院病历统计数据与出生登记及出生通知记录的关联:单胎和多胎出生常规数据关联的质量保证
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 1;8(3):e017898. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017898.
7
Saving babies' lives project impact and results evaluation (SPiRE): a mixed methodology study.拯救婴儿生命项目的影响和结果评估(SPiRE):一项混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1672-x.
8
Healthcare and wider societal implications of stillbirth: a population-based cost-of-illness study.死产的医疗保健和更广泛的社会影响:基于人群的疾病成本研究。
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(2):108-117. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14972. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
9
Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences.死产:经济和心理社会后果。
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):604-616. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00836-3. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
10
Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries.死产:高收入国家的行动呼吁。
Lancet. 2016 Feb 13;387(10019):691-702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01020-X. Epub 2016 Jan 19.